<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Rusted Sky</title>
      <link>http://www.rustedsky.net/</link>
      <description>Tar and feather them from orbit, it&apos;s the only way to be sure. - OTPU</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2013</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:47:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>This is getting annoying.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Sen. <a href="http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2013/01/23/feinstein-conn-senators-set-to-propose-assault-weapons-ban/">Feinstein's got a new list </a> up of what she wants to see banned.


You can <a href="http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Feinstein-Weapons-Ban-e1359047805173.jpg">see the list here</a>... at least, some of it.

Pay close attention to it - if you dig through the list there's a lot of stuff there that's actually pretty low-powered.  I know for a fact that the Hi-Point carbine she's referring to uses UP to a 10mm or .45 handgun cartridge.  Hi-Points don't equal high power, they're just fun little shooters.  But it's a scary black rifle, so it must be banned<em> for the children(tm).</em>

They seriously don't get the idea, do they? It's all symbolism over substance.  They don't know what the hell they're legislating against - you can tell that from the list. 

They're causing MORE rifles to be bought - of any sort and kind  The ammo shelves are seriously bare in the major retailers, and the on-line retailers aren't .  Each rifle and box of ammo sold should be a signal 'NO' to Washington - but they're not listening.  

They really need to.  They didn't listen regarding spending.  They didn't listen regarding Obamacare.  They haven't done a budget.  They're ignoring their most basic responsibilities to focus on 'nice to have' stuff that'll cost us average folks a lot... and the media's been quite cooperative to their desires.  The theory the 'progressives' in Washington seem to be operating under is that we're all incompetent, and we must depend on THEM to guide us every step of the way.

All they're doing is reinforcing their own prejudices.  Since we're NOT letting them guide us, we obviously  need their guidance even MORE.  And they'll force it on us whether we want it or not.

Ran across this yesterday...   <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/guns/gun-ethics.html">Ethics from the Barrel of a Gun: What Bearing Weapons Teaches About the Good Life</a>  It's an interesting read - here's a few exerpts...
<blockquote>
Nothing most of us will ever do combines the moral weight of life-or-death choice with the concrete immediacy of the moment as thoroughly as the conscious handling of instruments deliberately designed to kill. As such, there are lessons both merciless and priceless to be learned from bearing arms — lessons which are not merely instructive to the intellect but transformative of one's whole emotional, reflexive, and moral character.

The first and most important of these lessons is this: <strong>it all comes down to you.</strong>

A second is this:<strong> never count on being able to undo your choices.</strong>

A third lesson is this:<strong> the universe doesn't care about motives.</strong>

These are hard lessons, but necessary ones. Stated, in print, they may seem trivial or obvious. But ethical maturity consists, in significant part, of knowing these things — not merely at the level of intellect but at the level of emotion, experience and reflex. And nothing teaches these things like repeated confrontation with life-or-death choices in grave knowledge of the consequences of failure.</blockquote>  All that is self-evident, isn't it?  Surprising, really, how many people never learn them.  But it's lesson 4 that's the most important.
<blockquote>To believe one is incompetent to bear arms is, therefore, to live in corroding and almost always needless fear of the self — in fact, to affirm oneself a moral coward. A state further from "the dignity of a free man" would be rather hard to imagine. It is as a way of exorcising this demon, of <em>reclaiming</em> for ourselves the dignity and courage and ethical self-confidence of free (wo)men that the bearing of personal arms, is, ultimately, most important.

This is the final ethical lesson of bearing arms: <strong>that right choices are possible, and the ordinary judgement of ordinary (wo)men is sufficient to make them.</strong>

We can, truly, embrace our power and our responsibility to make life-or-death decisions, rather than fearing both. We <em>can</em> accept our ultimate responsibility for our own actions. We can know (not just intellectually, but in the sinew of experience) that we are <em>fit</em> to choose.

And not only can we — we <em>must</em>. The Founding Fathers of the United States understood why. If we fail this test, we fail not only in private virtue but consequently in our capacity to make public choices. Rudderless, lacking an earned and grounded faith in ourselves, we can only drift — increasingly helpless to summon even the <em>will</em> to resist predators and tyrants (let alone the <em>capability</em> to do so).</blockquote>
The folks in Washington look at 70 million people who legally own and use firearms - and want to disarm them.  They WANT the population to be helpless, to be dependent on THEM for protection and guidance.  Their desire for power, their lust for importance is leading them down a path that hurts us all, but their pride is such that they can't be bothered to recognize that, and they'll do 'what's good for us' regardless of how much we protest.

Now is the time to say NO - and make it clear that we mean it.  Write your representatives, write your senators - send them a PAPER letter expressing your dislike of what Sen. Feinstein's trying to do.  Email's fine - but easily deleted.  Paper, they have to physically throw away.

They need to know we mean it, that it's time for them to stop this once and for all.  No compromise is needed or wanted - it's time to put gun control away for good.

J.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.rustedsky.net/2013/01/this_is_getting_annoying.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.rustedsky.net/2013/01/this_is_getting_annoying.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:47:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Recent books...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Got a GOOD one for you here.  
<iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=russky-20&o=1&p=8&l=as1&asins=B009IEXKXI&ref=qf_sp_asin_til&fc1=000000&IS2=1&lt1=_blank&m=amazon&lc1=0000FF&bc1=000000&bg1=FFFFFF&f=ifr" style="width:120px;height:240px;" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0"></iframe>

If you're of a certain age, you might remember a movie called "Robinson Crusoe On Mars".  This is rather in the same format, but with a few caveats - the Mars in the book is a much less friendly one than in the movie, there's no aliens, there's no man Friday, no oxygen pills, no pressure to speak of, no monkey, and for resources (aside from sand and dust and rocks) nothing but what NASA sent up - which includes some potatoes.

You're alone, stranded on Mars.  (Why? Spoilers!)  You've got a bit less than two month's rations for 6 people. Your earliest possible rescue date, trusting NASA, is about 600 days away.

Good luck.

Buy it for the plot, read it for the potatoes.  (That's weird, but anyway...)  The guy's a bit free with profanity, but I don't see that's out of place.  He's stuck on MARS.  He's allowed.

It's a real page-turner - and if you had any interest at all in NASA and the space program, or remember Apollo 13, like hard SF, or have read Mary Roach's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0393339912/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0393339912&linkCode=as2&tag=russky-20">Packing for Mars: The Curious Science of Life in the Void</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=russky-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0393339912" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt=""> - then you're going to like this.  And at the low, low price of a buck, you'll DEFINITELY get your money's worth.

Now - onto something considerably different... if you ever read any of the Aubrey-Matin series such as <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0393325172/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0393325172&linkCode=as2&tag=russky-20">Master and Commander</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=russky-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0393325172" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> or  Forester's Hornblower series such as <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004Z1GBEO/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=B004Z1GBEO&linkCode=as2&tag=russky-20">Mr. Midshipman Hornblower</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=russky-20&l=as2&o=1&a=B004Z1GBEO" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />then you'll probably like this.  

<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005D14QMO/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=B005D14QMO&linkCode=as2&tag=russky-20">Westerly Gales</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=russky-20&l=as2&o=1&a=B005D14QMO" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> - and I really can't describe it better than the book description.<blockquote>Centuries after a "perfect storm" of nuclear war, plague, famine, and disorder has caused the greatest population crash in the history of the human species, a tiny group of refugees on a sub-Antarctic island maintains what they believe to be the last vestige of technological civilization. The Kerguelenians, as they begin to think of themselves, manage to survive, grow, and colonize other islands in the Southern and Indian Oceans -- until they are attacked by a mysterious seafaring group they call "the pirates". Who are the pirates, why are they hostile to the Kerguelinians -- and, most importantly, how can the peaceful islanders defend themselves against a force apparently determined to eradicate them? Kerguelenian master mariner Sam Bowditch takes on the enormous task of building a Navy from scratch to preserve the fledgling maritime civilization from utter destruction.</blockquote> If you take a look at the Kerguelen Islands - they're rather... remote, and not too pleasant.  I can see it as a last-ditch refuge, though whether there's the resources to maintain even an 1800's level of tech is an interesting question.  The series is a good read - and at a buck each for the first two, you'll get your money's worth.  (And the price for the third - $2.99, I gladly paid.  Which shows what I think of the series.)

For something a bit further out - if you're an SF reader, you've probably read John Scalzi's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0765348276/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0765348276&linkCode=as2&tag=russky-20">Old Man's War</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=russky-20&l=as2&o=1&a=0765348276" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />.  Short synopsis of THAT - the universe is full of hostile alien species, we're barely hanging on by a toehold, and the attrition rate on the toenail is appalling.   The next item on the list is a weekly series set in that universe - <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00AF62EX0/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=B00AF62EX0&linkCode=as2&tag=russky-20">The Human Division #1: The B-Team</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=russky-20&l=as2&o=1&a=B00AF62EX0" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />

Might not be for everyone - but what is?  It reminds me of Laumer's interstellar diplomacy stories about Jaime Retief.  (Which you can find, oddly enough, through Amazon.)  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/067165635X/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=067165635X&linkCode=as2&tag=russky-20">Envoy to New Worlds (Jaime Retief Series #1)</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=russky-20&l=as2&o=1&a=067165635X" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />  A mix of James Bond and... well, um... perhaps Jaime Hyneman from Mythbusters - they're a fun read.  Not too sure about Kindle availability, though.


That should do it for this week. I'll probably try this book review format again.

By the way - you may notice the links... I AM an Amazon Affiliate, and will get a few pennies for each thing you order if you go there through my links.  Just so you know...  

I'm not going to be recommending anything I haven't read and enjoyed myself.  And yes, I'm cheap, and will be going through the dollar ebooks for a while yet.  (Got a few more, but these are the highlights.

Anyway - whether you buy from my links or not, the books above ARE worthy of your attention, in my opinion.  If you disagree - let me know!
  
J.

(And just to make it a bit easier to keep track of what I reviewed...  a widget!  Yay!)

<OBJECT classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/flashplayer/current/swflash.cab" id="Player_5033c578-f0e2-424f-afa3-2bd3c999d1fb"  WIDTH="300px" HEIGHT="250px"> <PARAM NAME="movie" VALUE="http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?rt=qf_sp_asin_ssw&ServiceVersion=20070822&MarketPlace=US&ID=V20070822%2FUS%2Frussky-20%2F8003%2F5033c578-f0e2-424f-afa3-2bd3c999d1fb&Operation=GetDisplayTemplate"><PARAM NAME="quality" VALUE="high"><PARAM NAME="bgcolor" VALUE="#FFFFFF"><PARAM NAME="allowscriptaccess" VALUE="always"><embed src="http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?rt=qf_sp_asin_ssw&ServiceVersion=20070822&MarketPlace=US&ID=V20070822%2FUS%2Frussky-20%2F8003%2F5033c578-f0e2-424f-afa3-2bd3c999d1fb&Operation=GetDisplayTemplate" id="Player_5033c578-f0e2-424f-afa3-2bd3c999d1fb" quality="high" bgcolor="#ffffff" name="Player_5033c578-f0e2-424f-afa3-2bd3c999d1fb" allowscriptaccess="always"  type="application/x-shockwave-flash" align="middle" height="250px" width="300px"></embed></OBJECT> <NOSCRIPT><A HREF="http://ws.amazon.com/widgets/q?rt=qf_sp_asin_ssw&ServiceVersion=20070822&MarketPlace=US&ID=V20070822%2FUS%2Frussky-20%2F8003%2F5033c578-f0e2-424f-afa3-2bd3c999d1fb&Operation=NoScript">Amazon.com Widgets</A></NOSCRIPT>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.rustedsky.net/2013/01/recent_books.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.rustedsky.net/2013/01/recent_books.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:14:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Cheesy SF movies aren&apos;t dead...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[But after watching this, you might not feel so good yourself...

<a href="http://www.starship2.com/">
Starship II - Rendezvous With Ramses</a>

Don't know if this'll ever come out.  It looks... utterly horrible, if the practice of taking the best shots for the trailer is figured as a standard.  But then again it might just prove that old saying "Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should do it..."

Enjoy!  (Caution - take in small doses.)

J.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.rustedsky.net/2013/01/cheesy_sf_movies_arent_dead.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.rustedsky.net/2013/01/cheesy_sf_movies_arent_dead.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 07:15:08 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>And because we need a laugh...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/jrLvtoKZfxY?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Enjoy!

J.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.rustedsky.net/2013/01/and_because_we_need_a_laugh.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.rustedsky.net/2013/01/and_because_we_need_a_laugh.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 14:14:33 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Well, it&apos;s a new year.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[And just look at the mess laying around... 

Oh, well.  Just have to clean it up as best we can...

Re the Sandy Hook massacre...

I suppose it was really just a matter of time.  Whenever there's a disaster and there's any ambiguity as to the cause, you're going to be getting nutters.  Truthers, Conspiracy Theorists, or whatever - they're annoying as all get out at worst, slightly amusing at best.  ("Steel doesn't melt in fire!" ring any bells for anyone?)

And the Sandy Hook massacre isn't exempt.  Apparently there were enough 'discrepancies' in the accounts to cause a Florida Atlantic University Professor of Communications to think that there's some question that the shooting even took place - <blockquote>"While it sounds like an outrageous claim, one is left to inquire whether the Sandy Hook shooting ever took place — at least in the way law enforcement authorities and the nation's news media have described."</blockquote> Needless to say, FAU's disavowed any responsibility for what he's saying- and I sure can't say I blame them.  

And to bump up the score, he's also got doubts about the Kennedy Assassination, the Oklahoma City bombing, 9/11, and the shooting in Aurora, Colorado.

Nice to see he's versatile...  

<a href="http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/palm-beach/fl-fau-prof-newtown-20130107,0,4267958.story">Did The Shooting Really Happen?</a>

Now, one of the reasons why he was so skeptical of it all is that things just don't add up, re statements of witnesses, things being released and then later retracted, and so on.

But I don't see them as being immediate signs of a conspiracy.  Are there things that aren't adding up?  In a case like this, there always are.  Traumatic situations mess with the mind, and there were a lot of people and a lot of minds to be messed with.  But to take such things and immediately conclude there's a conspiracy is off-the-wall, in my opinion.

Which brings me to the SECOND thing.

Adam Lanza.  By all accounts, the guy was out there, barely able to function.  Home schooled, constantly supervised, about to (maybe) be committed because he couldn't function and his mother couldn't help - and there's not a word about whether he was on any sort of psychiatric  medication?  

Apparently almost all of the mass murderers in the last 20-30 years have either been on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (like Luvox, Paxil, Zoloft)  or had recently stopped taking them.  Is that the connection between them all, the common factor which sparks mass murder?  Apparently there's about a 4% chance of violent tendencies while taking - and when you STOP taking them there's a real chance for problems until the body gets used to not having them controlling serotonin any more.

So there you have it.  One nutter, thinking the whole thing was somehow staged.  And one other who's saying - "Hey, just wait a sec.  There's something missing..."  

<a href="http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/the-giant-gaping-hole-in-sandy-hook-reporting/">The Gaping Hole In Sandy Hook Reporting</a>

And that he's writing on WND doesn't invalidate the question.  IF SSRIs are implicated in mass murders (note the big 'IF') - wouldn't it make more sense to concentrate on THAT aspect before trying to restrict the law-abiding through more anti-gun legislation?  Because by what's documented, it looks like that stuff's caused a whole lot of grief over the years its been used.

Well, it's just a thought, anyway.  But the proximate cause (easy availability of firearms) doesn't seem to be the main driver of the problem.  Perhaps it's time to look at other causes.

J.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.rustedsky.net/2013/01/well_its_a_new_year.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.rustedsky.net/2013/01/well_its_a_new_year.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 13:56:50 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>A Rebirth of the Pulp Novel?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Mm.... could be.

The classic pulp novel was a cheap, adventure-filled page-turner.  If it were SF, the science was usually a bit sketchy, but you weren't buying it as a textbook, you were buying it for a fun, fast read.  You liked the characters, the stories were fast-paced, and you usually ended up wanting more.

There've been a number of pulps that have survived over the years.  One that I used to enjoy reading was the Remo Williams Destroyer series - which even spawned a movie.  (Hey, 145 books, they deserve a movie...)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Destroyer_(fiction)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089901/

One thing that the rise of the E-book has facilitated is a lot of self-publishing.  As in all efforts of that sort, you've got to weed through a few messes before you find a decent series.  So - for the New Year, here's a few you might find entertaining, if you're of the sort that enjoys series books, fast-paced action/adventure, interesting characters, or E-books in general.

<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Quicker-Ell-Donsaii-story-ebook/dp/B005ORQO7W/ref=tmm_kin_title_0">Quicker</a>  Interesting premise - what would faster neural response (both in the brain and the body) allow and enable?

<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Admiral-Spineward-Sectors-Novel-ebook/dp/B007WQSY44/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1357063241&sr=8-1&keywords=admiral+who">Admiral Who?</a> (Not to be confused with Doctor Who, by the way...)  Long, intricate, and full of OMG - WHAT?! moments - and a surly chief engineer.

<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mission-Fourth-Fleet-Irregulars-ebook/dp/B005EC3MPY/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1357063331&sr=1-1&keywords=mission+zero">Mission Zero - Fourth Fleet Irregulars</a>  Space Opera at its finest... for $2, you won't go far wrong.


<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Ships-David-Birkenhead-Series-ebook/dp/B008ADNAME/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1357063852&sr=1-1&keywords=Ships+boy">Ship's Boy - The David Birkenhead Series</a>  (First one's free - but I got all the rest in the series.)  Again - action-adventure-space opera, with an un-human protagonist that makes you wonder... just what DOES make a human a human?
 
That'll do for now.  There's other stuff I could point you at, but it's decidedly not... of the best.  In fact, one was so bad that it's been withdrawn, and the page is 404ing.  Hmmm.   I didn't think it was THAT horrible.  

Well - Happy 2013.  Here's hoping it goes well for you, and  ... well, let's just try to get through it with a few laughs and a few decent reads...

J.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.rustedsky.net/2013/01/a_rebirth_of_the_pulp_novel.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.rustedsky.net/2013/01/a_rebirth_of_the_pulp_novel.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 12:47:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>If you think - you already realize</title>
         <description><![CDATA[That when seconds count - the police are only minutes away.

Unfortunately, a lot of people don't know how to think.  They know how to emote, they know how to react to the emotions they feel, they think that the loudest voice is the right one.

But they don't... <em><strong>think</strong></em>.

It's not that they don't know how.  The trouble is they trust others more than they trust themselves.

Case in point - the tragic shooting in Newtown.  

The immediate thrust by politicians after the blood settled is to... increase regulations on firearms.  Because - apparently - there's no regulation on them now.  If there WAS regulation on firearms, the media would certainly report it, wouldn't it?

They don't - so there obviously isn't.  So - we must pass legislation to save the children.  Now. Because if you DON'T want to keep children from dying - you're a monster.

Right?

There's far too many people who think that if you don't see it mentioned on the news, it somehow doesn't exist.  That this is a very complex situation, with multiple causes, isn't relevant to the discussion.  Children died.  Politicians are calling for regulation.  Therefore - guns are the problem.  Oh - and our 'culture of violence'.  And maybe mental health issues.  But those are icky to deal with - we'll just try to legislate those horrible assault weapons out of existence.

Trouble is - we tried that already in 1994.  And it didn't make any perceptible difference over the ensuing decade.  At BEST it was a 'feel good' sort of action, something nicely symbolic but essentially meaningless.  And Connecticut's gun laws are the<a href="http://www.bradycampaign.org/stategunlaws/scorecard/CT"> fifth strongest in the nation</a>.  

What more can realistically be done?  

It depends on how you think.  

Looking at the issue from a troubleshooting standpoint, you look for common factors.  One occurrence of an event isn't sufficient to identify the cause of a problem - you're going to need three or more.  Think of a car, where the oil pump fails.  You take it to a repair shop, they go "Yeah, we see a lot of these.  They didn't make the gear attachment to the pump drive shaft right, so it gets stressed and can break.  The replacement's got a good attachment, you won't have any problems.

Problem: Bad oil pump.
Frequency: We see a lot of them.
Cause:  Lousy manufacturing technique
Solution: Proper manufacturing technique, and auto recall to fix potential problem w/pump.

So...

Problem: School shootings
Frequency:  Infrequent.
Cause:  Hard to determine
Common Factors:  Guns.  Drugs.  Mental health issues.  Mostly males, under 25.  All ate bananas at some point in their lives, and drank soda.

Where's the problem?  Guns?  There's roughly 150-200 million gun owners in the US.  To use an use an epidemiological/disease based model we'd see a whole lot more school shootings, and shootings in general if guns were a problem. But there seems to be an inverse correlation - as the number of guns in the US increases, shootings seems to go down.  So... tentatively, guns aren't the cause of the problem.

Same thing with bananas.  And soda.  Mass consumption items - if they were a problem, we'd see many more shootings.

Mental health issues?  Small subset there -  but virtually every one of the school shooters in the last 30 years had mental problems, and most were on medication... which can itself cause suicidal/homicidal tendencies.

So you look at all factors, figure out what's relevant and what isn't, form a hypothesis (like, maybe we need to look at mental health issues as the problem)  and then you try to figure out a least-disruptive, least-cost solution with THAT as the cause.

In this case, looking at everything released, it'd make more sense to put money towards mental health than it would towards gun control. 

The difference between troubleshooting a broken oil pump and a busted mind is that after the event, you still have the oil pump.  When a shooter kills himself, there's not all that much left to figure out where the flaw was.


And unfortunately, in cases like this there's an almost overwhelming urge to "DO SOMETHING!" quickly - and whether it's the right thing or not is completely beside the point. 

It's time to have a constructive discussion on how to prevent the next school shooting.  But the first thing that's got to be dumped is the automatic urge to ban guns. And it has to touch on the possibly icky conclusion that mental health issues need to be addressed far more than firearm legislation - THEY aren't something tangible that can be quickly addressed with legislation.

By the way,<a href="http://larrycorreia.wordpress.com/2012/12/20/an-opinion-on-gun-control/"> Larry Correia (Of MHI and Grimnoir Chronicles fame) has some thoughts on this</a>. <blockquote>However, before that I owned a gun store. We were a Title 7 SOT, which means we worked with legal machineguns, suppresors, and pretty much everything except for explosives. We did law enforcement sales and worked with equipment that is unavailable from most dealers, but that means lots and lots of government inspections and compliance paperwork. This means that I had to be exceedingly familiar with federal gun laws, and there are a lot of them. I worked with many companies in the gun industry and still have many friends and contacts at various manufacturers. When I hear people tell me the gun industry is unregulated, I have to resist the urge to laugh in their face.  </blockquote>

Troubleshoot the problem, and come up with an answer.  Banning guns, or increasing the controls on them, or making the 150+ million legal, law abiding gun owners criminals themselves  isn't a solution, or even a start to one.

J.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/12/if_you_think_you_already_reali.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/12/if_you_think_you_already_reali.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:48:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>It&apos;s the end of the world as we know it...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://andstillipersist.com/2012/11/the-gods-of-the-copybook-headings-illustrated/">“The Gods of the Copybook Headings” Illustrated</a>

A cautionary tale.

Especially the last verse.

J.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/12/its_the_end_of_the_world_as_we.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/12/its_the_end_of_the_world_as_we.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:44:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>For your entertainment...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Yes, it's cheesy.

But Project Moonbase is rather tasty cheese...

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/fODYWzkeC5A?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Judging by the picked frame...

"Do these pants make me look younger?"

"Why, no... they don't."


Enjoy!

J.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/12/for_your_entertainment.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/12/for_your_entertainment.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:29:30 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>And now for something kind of different,</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Yet kind of related...

<a href="http://jalopnik.com/5955401/">The History of the Garbage Truck</a>.



And <a href="http://www.classicrefusetrucks.com./">'Classic Refuse Trucks'</a>.



And... <a href="http://io9.com/5959308/the-fascinating-and-weird-memoirs-of-a-soviet-rocketeer">Soviet Rocketry Experiments.</a>

It's all a case of mind over matter.  If you don't mind, it doesn't matter... and suitable engineering can make the matter mind!

Seriously - what do you think the three have in common?

J.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/11/and_now_for_something_kind_of.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/11/and_now_for_something_kind_of.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:37:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>And so - it&apos;s over for now.</title>
         <description>The election has come, and has gone, and if you&apos;re disappointed or joyful at the results, let me pose a few things to you...

1.  For the last 4 years, nothing&apos;s been Obama&apos;s fault.  Any failures or problems have never been the result of anything he&apos;s done.

2.  Obama set up a fair amount of stuff that wouldn&apos;t take effect until his second term.  I don&apos;t know whether (cynically) he never figured it&apos;d get to a point where he had to make good on his promises, or whether he did intend the stuff he passed to become his legacy.  (Far better to have tried and failed due to being voted out of office, than stay in office and see your proposals enacted and fail miserably.)

3.  Our foreign policy hasn&apos;t exactly been successful.  If (when, actually) Iran develops nuclear weapons, the balance of power in the ME will shift dramatically.  Our experiences in the ME with Libya are just a precursor...

4.  Financially, we&apos;re in bad shape.  We haven&apos;t passed a budget in over 3 years. CHINA, of all countries, seems to be rather worried we re-elected Obama.    I think they&apos;re looking at the debt and going...&quot;Maybe we shouldn&apos;t have...&quot;  I don&apos;t see that issue getting better in the next 4 years, though I&apos;d be really happy to have that prediction be dead wrong.

In the end, though, now that Obama&apos;s won, he owns the entire situation.  No more blaming Bush, no more stalling off solving the problems we face.  Overall, Obama&apos;s reached the end of his excuses.  That&apos;s the good news.  The bad news - Obama doesn&apos;t have a clue about what to do beyond blame others for his own failures.

And that never solved any problem.

J.
</description>
         <link>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/11/and_so_its_over_for_now.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/11/and_so_its_over_for_now.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:09:36 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>And now for something considerably different...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/cBlRbrB_Gnc?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Man, gotta love those Air New Zealand  commercials...

J.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/11/and_now_for_something_consider.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/11/and_now_for_something_consider.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 17:14:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>John C pointed this out...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/wPjBXufufUU?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Whittle's right.

I'll be honest, I'm significantly worried at this point.  Not about the election, I think it's going to be a win for Romney - but about an electorate that can watch what Obama's done over the last 4 years and STILL think he's the best possible man for the job.

(Sigh...)

I swear, I don't understand how some folks think...

J.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/11/john_c_pointed_this_out.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/11/john_c_pointed_this_out.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:41:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Might want to watch this.  And spread it around.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gsa4uLmTw0M?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I know for a lot of people politics is a team sport.  They support the party their folks supported, or the party they voted for in college, or whatever.

But it's not.  The results of your support last a lot longer than an afternoon's game - they often last decades.

Take a good look, and see if the 'team' you support is getting the job done.  If not, you've got two choices - vote out the players on your team for folks you think WILL get the job done, or take a look at what the other team's players are saying they'll do.

You can make the call.

J.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/11/might_want_to_watch_this_and_s.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/11/might_want_to_watch_this_and_s.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 08:40:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>When you vote...</title>
         <description>Double-check your summary.  There&apos;s numerous stories of votes for Romney &apos;switching&apos; to become votes for Obama.

Double-check.  The election depends on it.

J.
</description>
         <link>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/10/when_you_vote.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.rustedsky.net/2012/10/when_you_vote.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:36:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
