If Election Was Held Today, Romney would win by 26 electoral votes.
I leave it to you to read the actual article.
I think what we're seeing, and I could well be wrong, is a general realization that Obama - for all his excellent rhetorical skills when reading a good speech on his teleprompter - is hopelessly incompetent to be President, and Biden's worse.
Romney and Ryan are running as adults. They're putting forth ideas and concepts that Obama and Biden - and their sycophants in the media, are having a hell of a time refuting. You can't, when trying to disparage a plan, go "That can't possibly work!" without (A) actually explaining WHY it can't, and/or (B) having something that you can point at as a workable alternative.
A and B are notably lacking in the Obama campaign. Obama's big line now is that his budget (which is so messed up that he gets NO votes from either Republicans OR Democrats) - will save $4 trillion over the next 10 years. With another stimulus, everything will be just fine.
Well, we're running $1.5 trillion deficit a year at present. If we continue that, we'll only be $11 trillion more in the hole rather than $15? Somehow, we're to take your promise of fiscal prosperity if we only give you even MORE money as the way to a bright future?
Color me unimpressed. He can't be serious about this. And if he is - then he's really incompetent.
Zombie over at Zombietime has an excellent takedown of Obama's "You didn't build that" speech. The takeaway on it is scary. That's another I'll not try to excerpt. (You might also want to check out the "Occupy The Farm" post. It's entertaining, and instructive.)
At this point, we're seeing the political choices for President boiling down to someone with proven governing ability, economic acumen, and a record of success, who has chosen an economically literate VP, who has a plan for the future and presents it well - and a spoiled incompetent with delusions of grandeur with a VP that (to put it charitably) should probably have been urged to retire in '08.
(If the DNC tapped Hillary for VP at this point, if I were her, I'd put on track shoes and look to Usain Bolt for advice on running away from that 'honor'.) (Hmm. Looks like she already has. Don't know how I feel about her running for President - I think her political star has long since set - but she couldn't be worse than Obama.)
I do know this much - if Romney/Ryan win, we'll likely get out of the mess we're in. It won't be painless - it'll be rough as hell. It's going to take a long time to overturn and roll back a lot of the garbage that Obama's put in place, and it's going to take even longer to shrink government back down. It's going to hurt - there's no way around it.
If Obama wins - well, we're sunk. Unfettered by a need to actually please enough people to get elected again, we'll see an Obama that'll probably emulate Hugo Chavez.
We have a choice in November. Hope and Change - or Fear and Blame? Which will you choose?
J.
Comments (6)
Good Post. Couple of thoughts...
I cannot believe anyone is allowed to get away with saying X will save Y over ten years.
If Obama does win again, I'm really quite concerned as to what it is he's promised Putin.
If Hillary did accept the VP position, her career would be over; she'd never have a shot at being President. And from my perspective, I really don't think she'd do any better. I think she's a female version of BHO.
Last thought, I think Romney/Ryan wins in a landslide. Riots will ensue, and Obama will try something to retain power.
Posted by Hank_M | August 17, 2012 1:26 PM
Posted on August 17, 2012 13:26
Jerry:
I agree that anyone interested in reasoned debate on any subject shouldn't go, "'That can't possibly work!' without (A) actually explaining WHY it can't, and/or (B) having something that you can point at as a workable alternative."
But you forgot the Progressive/Democrat standard debate strategy for substantive rebuttal, "You're a RACIST, Shut Up!!!!"
Otpu
Posted by Otpu | August 18, 2012 6:31 AM
Posted on August 18, 2012 06:31
Hank_M -
They not only predict that X will save Y over 10 years, they immediately have plans to SPEND the amount saved.
I swear, there's something in the water in DC....
J.
Posted by JLawson | August 18, 2012 8:34 AM
Posted on August 18, 2012 08:34
John -
The Racism card only works when someone is decidedly non-racist. The racist will admit it, and the term will have no power.
Now they're finding 'code words' and 'dogwhistles' indicating racism. There's little to no overt racism, so they've got to pretend there's a deep malignancy just under the surface.
That seems to me to show that they know that they've lost the 'racism' battle, but they've got nothing else.
J.
Posted by JLawson | August 18, 2012 8:40 AM
Posted on August 18, 2012 08:40
I think the P/D's are getting very confused lately because their favorite weapon of rhetorical mass destruction is not causing their opponents to shut up, apologize, and go away like it should but is actually drawing criticism toward their side from some of their traditional allies.
Otpu
Posted by Otpu | August 18, 2012 11:32 AM
Posted on August 18, 2012 11:32
Good. It's about damn time.
The sad thing is, I don't believe that they really care.
It's not about racism per se. It's about the feelings they get FIGHTING racism.
J.
Posted by JLawson | August 18, 2012 1:23 PM
Posted on August 18, 2012 13:23