As a community organizer - which is the thing he's basing his primary expertise and qualifications as President on? Take a look at Best of the Web Today - WSJ.com
But Obama did not decide only that "community organizing" was not for him. Judis reports the future senator took part in a September 1989 symposium in which he "rejected the guiding principles of community organizing: the elevation of self-interest over moral vision; the disdain for charismatic leaders and their movements; and the suspicion of politics itself." Later, Obama "would begin to construct a political identity for himself that was not simply different from his identity as a community organizer--but was, in fact, its very opposite."I could question the timing on this. Obama's starting to look like one of the least effectual presidential candidates in my lifetime - and judging by his record as a 'community organizer' I can't see how he'd be handed the management of a fast-food outlet, much less the Presidency of the US.Judis offers the closest thing we've heard to a job description for "community organizers." What they do, he writes, is "unite people of different backgrounds around common goals and use their collective strength to wring concessions from the powers that be." To help illuminate this rather vague description, Judis also enumerates some of the tasks Obama and his colleagues undertook.
Before Obama's arrival in Chicago, Kellman and his "partner," Mike Kruglik, set out "to revive the region's manufacturing base--and preserve what remained of its steel industry--by working with unions and church groups to pressure companies and the city; but those hopes were quickly dashed." Apparently the presence of "community organizers" is not a strong selling point for companies making location decisions. Go figure.
Obama set his sights lower, but still missed the mark. He "got community members to demand a job center that would provide job referrals, but there were few jobs to distribute." Then "he tried to create what he called a 'second-level consumer economy' . . . consisting of shops, restaurants, and theaters. This, too, went nowhere."
These efforts at economic development having failed, Obama "began to focus on providing social services for Altgeld Gardens," a government-owned and -operated apartment complex:
"We didn't yet have the power to change state welfare policy, or create local jobs, or bring substantially more money into the schools," [Obama] wrote. "But what we could do was begin to improve basic services at Altgeld--get the toilets fixed, the heaters working, the windows repaired." Obama helped the residents wage a successful campaign to get the Chicago Housing Authority to promise to remove asbestos from the units; but, after an initial burst of activity, the city failed to keep its promise. (As of last year, some residences still had not been cleared of asbestos.)It is both funny and scary that one of America's major political parties would offer this record of sheer futility as its nominee's chief qualification to be president of the United States. Even more striking, though, is how alien the world in which Obama operated was by comparison with the world in which normal Americans live.Reader, when your toilet breaks, do you wait around for some Ivy League hotshot to show up and organize a meeting so that you can use your collective strength to wring concessions from the powers that be?
Or do you call a plumber?
As a "community organizer," Obama toiled within a subculture of such abject dependency that even home repairs were "social services," provided by government (or, in Obama's Chicago, not provided). It was an utterly bizarre intersection between the cultural elite and the underclass. By Judis's account, Obama's Columbia degree was useless. He would have been more helpful if he'd gone to vocational school instead.
Judis quotes an Altgeld resident as telling Obama, "Ain't nothing gonna change. . . . We just gonna concentrate on saving our money so we can move outta here as fast as we can." Certainly no one can fault Obama for doing the same thing. But what did Obama move outta there to do? To become a politician--specifically, an "idealistic" politician who wants "to make major changes in poverty." Guys like that created this mess in the first place.
My evaluation of the DNC just dropped a few points. They really couldn't be so stupid to think that nobody would ever look at the 'community organizer' thing and see if it worked, would they?
J.
Comments (3)
Well he tried! He tried real hard!
Doesn't he deserve a hug and a cookie?
otpu
Posted by Otpu | September 9, 2008 10:52 AM
Posted on September 9, 2008 10:52
I don't think it matters to the DNC...I think all they want is a figurehead, and the less capable the better. In fact, Hillary might have been a drag for two reasons - her negatives plus she actually had some things that she wanted to get done, and knew how to _get_ them done. She also had Bill who might be able to help her add a spoonful of sugar to the medicine she'd plan on giving us - for our own good, of course.
If I had to choose one of the two, I think I'd prefer Obama - not because I agree with him, but because I think they're both socialists and he's less likely to get anything done than she is.
Posted by suek | September 9, 2008 11:55 AM
Posted on September 9, 2008 11:55
Here's a very interesting article:
http://contrariancommentary.blogspot.com/
Posted by suek | September 10, 2008 1:23 PM
Posted on September 10, 2008 13:23