So this probably isn't a joke.
The Silent Scream of the AsparagusI recall reading, a number of years back, a story where humans had been 'adjusted' (whether through psychological conditioning or a machine broadcasting some radiation that caused it I can't recall) to a point where the thought of killing anything caused severe nausea, and the consumption of animals was virtually impossible for most of the population. In extreme cases, even the 'alge cakes' the government provided couldn't be eaten... because, after all, the alge were at one time alive. Farmers couldn't use insecticide, doctors had a hard time using antibiotics. Soap and personal hygene were right out - because bacteria live on your skin.You just knew it was coming: At the request of the Swiss government, an ethics panel has weighed in on the "dignity" of plants and opined that the arbitrary killing of flora is morally wrong. This is no hoax. The concept of what could be called "plant rights" is being seriously debated.
...
What is clear, however, is that Switzerland's enshrining of "plant dignity" is a symptom of a cultural disease that has infected Western civilization, causing us to lose the ability to think critically and distinguish serious from frivolous ethical concerns. It also reflects the triumph of a radical anthropomorphism that views elements of the natural world as morally equivalent to people.
Why is this happening? Our accelerating rejection of the Judeo-Christian world view, which upholds the unique dignity and moral worth of human beings, is driving us crazy. Once we knocked our species off its pedestal, it was only logical that we would come to see fauna and flora as entitled to rights.
The intellectual elites were the first to accept the notion of "species-ism," which condemns as invidious discrimination treating people differently from animals simply because they are human beings. Then ethical criteria were needed for assigning moral worth to individuals, be they human, animal, or now vegetable.
Needless to say, the human race was dwindling fast.
Sorry, but I don't remember much more of the story.. But if there's an insistence on giving plants rights - how long would it be until some joker insists bacteria have rights also, and then some council somewhere agrees with him?
Crazy years, ain't they?
J.
Comments (5)
>>the notion of "species-ism," which condemns as invidious discrimination treating people differently from animals simply because they are human beings.>>
Ok...so why are _they_ treating people differently from animals? Do they feel animals have a moral responsibility to _not_ eat each other? or not eat plants? So by their very condemnation of humans, _they_ are guilty of speciation!
Posted by suek | May 4, 2008 12:30 PM
Posted on May 4, 2008 12:30
Old stuff! The Atlanta Radio Theatre Company tackled this concept years ago:
http://www.scifidimensions.com/Dec02/inhumanrights.htm
Posted by RNB | May 4, 2008 9:52 PM
Posted on May 4, 2008 21:52
Ron -
First time, comedy.
Second time - tragedy.
Maybe you need to translate Inhuman Rights into French and send it to the Swiss...
J.
Posted by JLawson | May 4, 2008 9:57 PM
Posted on May 4, 2008 21:57
SueK -
That comes next week. I'm sure they'll be able to persuade predators they'd be better off as vegetarians... after all, look at how well a wolf's digestion would handle vegetable material as the main diet!
J.
Posted by JLawson | May 4, 2008 10:00 PM
Posted on May 4, 2008 22:00
>>after all, look at how well a wolf's digestion would handle vegetable material as the main diet!>>
Well, you'd think so after watching the ads for Beneful...!
Posted by suek | May 5, 2008 11:31 AM
Posted on May 5, 2008 11:31