Odd thought ... the other day when I went to REI to try to pick up a topological map of the local area, they didn't have any. No USGS maps, either 7.5 minute, 30 minute (half a degree) or 1x2 degree sizes. I was kind of surprised - the maps have been a staple of hiking for decades.
And I got to thinking... why would they still be popular? With GPS units so cheap, (the cost of a good sleeping bag) something as boring as a paper map would just be... old fashioned.
Sigh.
A good topo map is a work of art. Compiled from aerial photos, it'll show a lot more information about an area than a GPSW ever will... such as the lay of the land, slopes, ravines, and let you plan out the easiest paths... but you have to know how to read it. And such a skill isn't hard to learn... if you've got a good map handy. Which is the sticking point.
They're available on-line - and you can even download them in PDF format but it's kind of tough printing them out. (Kinko's can't do it, except as a special-order job.)
Well, there's one possibility in the Atlanta area - Bradford Map and Globe. I'll check them out and let you know...
Update: I called - and they're not open on the weekends. 10 to 6, M-F. So I guess I'll have to order what I'm looking for on-line... which is annoying.
J.
Comments (12)
I remember that either Oxford or Oxford,Too had a map room with cabinets with the maps in large shallow drawers. Bass Pro might have some topo maps and IIRC, there were some in the gift shop at Unicoi. You might also go to the local FBO and get a sectional chart. The scale and details are different, but its something that can be picked up rather than mail ordered.
Posted by James | January 13, 2008 12:59 AM
Posted on January 13, 2008 00:59
Sectionals aren't a problem - I can get out-of-date stuff over at the plant from time to time. (Even passed the guys in the Den some of them, along with compasses.)
But you'd think SOMEWHERE in the Atlanta area you could get topo maps on a weekend. What good is living in a major metro area otherwise?
J.
Posted by JLawson | January 13, 2008 1:18 PM
Posted on January 13, 2008 13:18
Jerry:
In the age of GPS I'm afraid that finding a paper TOPO map in the scale you're looking for would be like trying to find a new buggy whip in 1912, four years after the first Model T rolled off the assembly line.
Here's what's killing paper maps:
http://shop.delorme.com/OA_HTML/DELibeCCtdItemDetail.jsp?item=27705§ion=10106
with, of course, the software:
http://shop.delorme.com/OA_HTML/DELibeCCtdItemDetail.jsp?item=27525§ion=10050
otpu
Posted by Otpu | January 13, 2008 6:55 PM
Posted on January 13, 2008 18:55
Oddly enough, there is an article in todays paper about Bradford Maps. Their business is down 70% in the last 5 years. They have a store in Decatur that they are selling.
Posted by James | January 13, 2008 8:44 PM
Posted on January 13, 2008 20:44
Bet there won't be many buyers for it, James.
But John's right - if you can buy something that'll print out the map you want at the scale you want it at - why not go that way?
And 40 years from now - a paper map will be a pricy collectors' item...
Hey, think I should stock up so the little guy will have a fund for HIS kids' education?
J.
Posted by JLawson | January 13, 2008 10:54 PM
Posted on January 13, 2008 22:54
Couple of thoughts:
I do a lot with computer based topo maps -- but I also buy topos fairly regularly.
Posted by Mark Wroth | January 14, 2008 12:09 AM
Posted on January 14, 2008 00:09
Coming from an agency that made gov't maps for DoD the reason for the popularity of printed maps is: color quality, readability, decent paper stock, and low cost as the longer the press run the lower the cost per sheet, while digital is fixed cost per sheet.
Believe me, after looking at this arena, from the inside, nothing beats a laminated printed map. Rain protection, useful in survival situations, never needs a battery, and you can shoot a map and it is still readable...
Thin film, high resolution digital displays will get there (and even hold an image with the power off). But if you need a map that will do just about anything, then printed on tyvek, like the Special Forces require, is a perfect survival utility and we even printed how to make shelters, collect dew, funnel rainwater, make it into a hat... laminated paper does that ok, but nothing beats tyvek. Very few get made, of course, but they are one of the best survival add-ons around... plus there are the maps on them.
Remember, for hard copy to go away, digital must meet all the functional needs of the original material at a lower per unit cost. So far nothing beats an offset press for lowering printing costs. Which is why the Nanosolar folks using roll-to-roll presses (plexo, if memory serves) will make a mint: low cost per unit, higher efficiency per unit surface, and cheap to make.
Posted by ajacksonian | January 17, 2008 12:30 PM
Posted on January 17, 2008 12:30
AJacksonian -
Hmmm. You know, I'm not at all surprised they use Tyvek. It's GOOD stuff, durable as all get-out, and you can print on it too. What's not to like?
J.
Posted by JLawson | January 17, 2008 10:28 PM
Posted on January 17, 2008 22:28
First a little nit pick. The maps are "topographical", not "topological". Only thing I've found to correct at an otherwise great site. I had a similar experience while visiting in NW Arkansas a couple years ago. Lewis and Clark Outfitters will sell you a map, but they generate it in the store from computer files, and the quality as well as the cost don't match the old USGS quads. Luckily at home I have pretty complete coverage of the old quad maps. If your area of interest lies within a national forest and you plan ahead, the Forest Service might help with pretty up-to-date 40' contour mapping. Ask for the good stuff that they keep for themselves. By now they might have gone in to producing their own compiled maps on site instead of using the USGS products. It might be just as efficient to go directly to USGS. I wonder if AJacksonian worked for the agency that produced tactical mapping during Vietnam. I saw some that was so current you could read the bomb craters in the imagery and contour lines. That's mapping!
Posted by linearthinker | January 18, 2008 1:49 AM
Posted on January 18, 2008 01:49
First a little nit pick. The maps are "topographical", not "topological". Only thing I've found to correct at an otherwise great site. I had a similar experience while visiting in NW Arkansas a couple years ago. Lewis and Clark Outfitters will sell you a map, but they generate it in the store from computer files, and the quality as well as the cost don't match the old USGS quads. Luckily at home I have pretty complete coverage of the old quad maps. If your area of interest lies within a national forest and you plan ahead, the Forest Service might help with pretty up-to-date 40' contour mapping. Ask for the good stuff that they keep for themselves. By now they might have gone in to producing their own compiled maps on site instead of using the USGS products. It might be just as efficient to go directly to USGS. I wonder if AJacksonian worked for the agency that produced tactical mapping during Vietnam. I saw some that was so current you could read the bomb craters in the imagery and contour lines. That's mapping! And it was done over 40 years ago.
Posted by linearthinker | January 18, 2008 2:20 AM
Posted on January 18, 2008 02:20
Crap! Sorry about that double post. Don't know how it happened, except I got busy following some NH election recount news. Multi-tasking?
Some interesting stuff out of NH here and here.
Posted by linearthinker | January 18, 2008 2:36 AM
Posted on January 18, 2008 02:36
Not a problem with the double posts - I'll prune one for ya. (If you'd like it back, shipping and handling will be extra.)
Yep, you're right on the topological - it should have been topographical. What can I say? I was so bummed out I mixed up my tops.
J.
Posted by JLawson | January 19, 2008 12:24 AM
Posted on January 19, 2008 00:24