I'm gonna have to start paying her.
SueK points out in Part of the Problem that the emphasis in the legal system is on WINNING - not on actually making sure justice is done. In a story she points up at Newsmax concerning the Haditha trials, apparently the prosecution took 8 to 10 hours of drone coverage and edited it down to about one hour.
The Marine intelligence officer who monitored the Scan Eagle’s video transmissions throughout the day told NewsMax that there was continuous video feed from the Scan Eagle for 8 to 10 hours. Yet barely an hour of it was provided to the Marines' defense teams by the prosecution or the Naval Criminal Investigation Service.Now, correct me if I'm wrong (and I probably am) but doesn't the prosecution have an obligation to provide ALL the evidence, complete and intact, whether it's good for their case or not, upon request?“Someone, under the supervision of NCIS, screened this video feed, and made the conscious decision to preserve only four segments of approximately 15 minutes each – according to the defense attorneys who received it upon discovery release,” our intelligence source confided.
“This 8 to 10 hours, viewed in its entirety, shows men in black, with weapons, fleeing the neighborhood of houses 1, 2, 3 and 4 [the area where the civilians and eight of the insurgents were killed]. It follows their route as they meet up with other insurgents throughout the city. It clearly demonstrates the magnitude of the insurgents’ organization, skill, and timing in attacking Marines.”
The video, he recalled, “shows them parking, exiting the vehicle, and entering the housing complex. It shows Marines assaulting the building, insurgents fleeing out the back of the building, and Marines falling back from the assault as the insurgents defend the house.”
Finally, the intelligence officer revealed, the full, undoctored Scan Eagle video “shows an insurgent, at the end of the day, under continuous observation from the air and under continuous pursuit and fire, emerge from a family's home holding their children hostage, in order to protect himself from further air strikes.”
From this article, it looks like there was a hell of a lot of creative editing going on. The facts be damned, the truth is irrelevant. They were playing a game - the objective of which was to get as many convictions as possible. The consequences to the Marines involved didn't matter. The effect on morale, on how the US military was seen on the world stage, on whether their promotion of the 'Haditha Massacre' meme helped the bad guys - that wasn't important at all. The game was all.
I'm not saying we need a star chamber atmosphere, with everything hidden. If Marines do something wrong, they need to be accountable for it. But fighting a war isn't the same thing as fighting a bunch of bank robbers, and Marines aren't policemen who are going to try to keep innocents from being hurt even if it means the bad guys get away. War is NOT clean and sanitary and unambiguious. It never has been.
From a lot of evidence, the Marines did what they were trained to do, and what they should have done. To second-guess every move made in wartime and measure it against the standards of a peacetime military, that way lies madness.
When reporting issues like this, what we need is honesty and the complete story, not some carefully edited version that'll promote the prosecution's side of things. I guess it's too much to expect of the press that they'll be willing to give soldiers the benefit of the doubt, and see them as innocent until proven guilty. After all, how are they going to get good ratings unless there's sensational news to report? And what's better than the US military going bad?
As SueK says.. "...the focus has become one of the individual winning, not on justice" - and that's a real bad sign for all of us.
J.
Comments (4)
"video edited for content to preserve operational security."
Yeah, right.
otpu
Posted by Otpu | September 7, 2007 4:45 PM
Posted on September 7, 2007 16:45
Like the officers at the court martial wouldn't be cleared...
Gotta have a win - all else is secondary in the legal game!
J.
Posted by JLawson | September 8, 2007 5:21 AM
Posted on September 8, 2007 05:21
"'Someone, under the supervision of NCIS, screened this video feed, and made the conscious decision to preserve only four segments of approximately 15 minutes each...'"
Under the supervision of NCIS...is the real killer for me. As the say...with friends like this...! This leaves me with a feeling of betrayal that I simply cannot express. The NCIS is supposed to investigate, true, but to leave out information that is critical to the defense of these marines....that is simply traitorous.
Posted by suek | September 8, 2007 11:52 AM
Posted on September 8, 2007 11:52
Bet it was the prosecution...
After all - why show something that indicates your case is bogus? It's like being charged for a robbery at a convenience store, and the only snippet of surveilance tape is of you being real fidgety in line.
No, there should be an investigation here. Something sure isn't passing the sniff test.
J.
Posted by JLawson | September 8, 2007 1:00 PM
Posted on September 8, 2007 13:00