« June 2007 | Main | August 2007 »

July 2007 Archives

July 1, 2007

Reverse Action

It's rather odd I didn't pick up on this before. I've known about Axis Sally and Tokyo Rose - Father used to listen to Tokyo Rose in the Pacific - but didn't realize that the same propaganda techniques used in WW2 were being used by our own media today.

Information Warfare: Japanese Propaganda and American Mass Media

But recently, the troops have been passing around an interesting discovery. Namely, that the Japanese psychological warfare effort during World War II included radio broadcasts that could be picked up by American troops. Popular music was played, but the commentary (by one of several English speaking Japanese women) always hammered away on the same points;

1 Your President (Franklin D Roosevelt) is lying to you.
2 This war is illegal.
3 You cannot win the war.

The troops are perplexed and somewhat amused that their own media is now sending out this message. Fighting the enemy in Iraq is simple, compared to figuring out what news editors are thinking back home.

Yeah, I'm somewhat amused too.

It's understandable that the propagandists in Japan and Germany tried hard to convince American soldiers that their President was lying, the war was illegal, and that they couldn't win.

What's not so understandable is why our own media would present the same message. I find it difficult to believe when faced with the examples of what's happened in Islamic countries, when seeing the excesses of Al Quaeda and other Islamic groups slaughtering people, that they can rationally believe that the West is at fault. I'm aware of the current leftward leanings of the media - but are they really so blind that they don't see that Western civilization is at stake? The world is far too small these days to believe that distance and the oceans will protect us, and we're so interconnected these days via the internet that someone in Dayton, OH can access jihadi material easily... and if of an Islamist bent can end up looking for ways to join the struggle, either overseas or here at home. (Imagine, if you will, the German American Bund being allowed to freely recruit for soldiers or saboteurs here in the US for Germany in WW2, with the newspapers actively talking it up and praising the work they did.)

The war against radical Islam isn't a matter so much of physical warfare now. Asymmetrical warfare can be pretty hard on the locals, and Al Quaeda's not gathering many friends in the ME. It is much more akin to pest control/eradication than the setpiece warfare we anticipated with the USSR and China. I don't think, after the fall of Saddam, we're going to see another setpiece battle between nations, which is rather comforting... kind of nice to know we're not going to do the MAD thing again for a while.

Now it's more a matter of ideological infection control, and it's necessary to both eradicate the ideology where found and prevent it from sporing off and gaining converts elsewhere. The best way (IMHO) to do this is to deny any victory at all to the Islamists. You don't glorify them, you don't call them 'freedom fighters', you don't have a carbomb going off and killing five people have the headlines and very good progress on the fight against the folks setting carbombs get ignored. You want to deny the enemy good press.

Which is why it's funny that the Western media is acting as a propaganda outlet for the enemy, which would destroy them if they could...

The world is smaller now than it was in 1945. The media won't be protected by distance, and they're knocking down the soldiers and morale of the countries that would protect them from a future they really, really don't want.

J.

July 2, 2007

Let's see... so much to comment on.

Over at Instapundit.com -

MICHAEL YON EMAILS: "Baqubah has gone quiet. Very little fighting. There might be more to come, but overall the people have turned against al Qaeda and are pointing them out day by day. The people are pointing out the bombs. Baqubah received its first food shipment in 10 months just a few days ago, even while light fighting was still on. I was there for the food distribution and am writing a dispatch on it. The primary object now is to start to restore a sense of normalcy in the city. Remember Ramadi? That crazy city of death and fighting? Writers hardly want to go there any more because it's quiet. I am very curious if Baqubah will go that way. So far so good. There are serious sectarian issues here in Diyala Province, but with al Qaeda on defense instead of offense, the people in Baqubah have a chance to do what those in Ramadi and other cities are doing: reclaim their lives."
Hmmm. Maybe the Iraqi people have had their fill of their 'brothers' coming and 'helping' them out. There've been reports of people killed for having tomatoes and cucumbers in the same bag... and although this does sound wierd, there's a reason for it...
U.S.: Sunni insurgents battling al-Qaida - Conflict in Iraq - MSNBC.com

American commanders cite al-Qaida's severe brand of Islam, which is so extreme that in Baqouba, al-Qaida has warned street vendors not to place tomatoes beside cucumbers because the vegetables are different genders, Col. David Sutherland said.

Vegetables. Hot vegetables? They're obsessed with hot vegetable SEX, for crying out loud. I'm trying to come up with a joke... but it's pretty clear Al Qaida's gone so round the bend with sexual obsession that it's no wonder why they blow themselves up... Sheer frustration is driving them MAD, I tell you! MAAAAADDDD! Mars needs women! (Or Al Q needs a heck of a lot of subscriptions to Playboy and a lesson on how to get a grip on yourself from Surgeon General Elders.) And don't anyone tell them about VeggieTales and Bob the Tomato and Larry the Cucumber! Why, it could be worse than the TeleTubbies and Tinky-Winky! But then again... it could be a cactus fixation. Yow.

But if they see this yam, it's all over. (NSFW, unless you can explain to your boss it's really a yam before they sic the HR folk on you for insensitivity to Vegetable-Americans.) Humorous vegetables on the internets. Gotta love it...

Re Scooter Libby... I'm kind of stonkered on this one. Let's see, there wasn't any crime committed, at least nothing that anyone's been charged with. But because he couldn't remember spot-on what he told to who he got slammed with years in jail and a $250,000 fine.

Meanwhile, Sandy Berger pleads nolo contendre to charges he took classified documents and gives up his law license rather than try to defend himself... which makes me wonder just who he's protecting and what he made off with. Berger loses his license, pays $25k. Seems kind of odd...

Global warming may be caused by something else entirely. One main problem is we don't necessarily know what questions to ask, or what to make of the answers when we do get them. It IS noticeably warmer on Mars and Pluto, which would tie into a more active sun, which would tie into the theory presented above. More info on the same here. Then again...

BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | 'Scepticism' over climate claims

The public believes the effects of global warming on the climate are not as bad as politicians and scientists claim, a poll has suggested.

The Ipsos Mori poll of 2,032 adults - interviewed between 14 and 20 June - found 56% believed scientists were still questioning climate change.

There was a feeling the problem was exaggerated to make money, it found.

The Royal Society said most climate scientists believed humans were having an "unprecedented" effect on climate.

The survey suggested that terrorism, graffiti, crime and dog mess were all of more concern than climate change.

When it comes to a choice of being concerned with immediate dog poop versus possible climate change, I think the dog poop would have priority.

Let's see... the folks who did the attempted car bombings are doctors... apparently they're better doctors than bomb-makers. And over at The Daily Brief: Military Musings and Thoughts Less Filtered � The Whip Hand and the Velvet Glove, Sgt. Mom's got some interesting observations.

It is reported in the aftermath of the car-bomb attempt on the Glasgow airport terminal, that bystanders yelled “let the ****er burn!” as rescuers attempted to extinguish the fire burning on the clothes and flesh of one of the aspiring jihadis.

This happening and the fact that it was even noted and reported may be seen as a kind of harbinger. It may be an indication that the masses, or the ordinary people, the proletariat… or whatever you want to call the non-elite are no longer buying the load being sold to them.

Expect serious blowback if there's a successful bombing. And again, the pendulum will swing from "Bush is taking away our liberties because of a fake war!" to "He didn't do enough to protect us, and still isn't!"

Well, that's about it for tonight. I gotta get some sleep, I'm flat out of Provigil... not that I was taking it before... but I really wouldn't mind being able to sleep for only about 3, 4 hours a day...

J.

July 5, 2007

Now THAT'S a headline!

Terribly insensitive, of course.

The Daily Record - NEWS - HERO CABBIE: I KICKED BURNING TERRORIST SO HARD IN BALLS THAT I TORE A TENDON

A HERO cabbie who took on the Glasgow Airport terror suspects told yesterday how he booted one of them in the privates.

Alex McIlveen, 45, kicked the man, whose body was in flames, so hard that he tore a tendon in his foot.

But he said last night: "He didn't even flinch. I couldn't believe he didn't go down.

"A doctor told me later I'd damaged a tendon in my foot."

I'm thinking there's a lot of folks who have pretty much the mindset that if they see terrorist activity, if that activity doesn't kill said terrorist, they're going to be quite content to give the terrorist aid - probaby with a large wrench, a piece of pipe, a tire iron or length of rope. Due process be damned - they're tired of being told they're bad people for not giving radical Islam everything it wants.

The next failed event will likely see the terrorist wanna-bes torn limb from limb. They're TIRED of terrorism, and aren't willing to put up with it.

J.

On this 4th of July...

Consider this...

OpinionJournal - Featured Article

It's easy now, in a nation awash with complaints about what our Founders did not do, what imperfect humans they seem to 21st century eyes, to overlook how startlingly bold their views and actions were in their own day and are, in fact, even today. Who else in 1776 declared, let alone thought it a self-evident truth, that all men were created equal, entitled to inalienable rights, or to any rights at all? How few declare these views today or, glibly declaring them, really intend to treat their countrymen or others as equal, entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?

Certainly not America's 20th century enemies, the Nazis and communists; certainly not today's Islamic radicals, who consider infidels unworthy to live and the faithful bound by an ancient and brutal code of law. We are fortunate that the Founders of our nation were enlightened, generous, jealous of their rights and those of their countrymen, and prepared to risk everything to create a free republic.

It is ever so tempting to look on what they begun, and criticize it for not being perfect right from the start. Instead of thinking in a 'progressive' manner, in that we are always trying to make things better, the critics of the US, of the founding fathers try to present their arguement in a binary approach - if there are any perceived flaws in our government or society, what exists is therefore worthless and should be destroyed immediately.


Never mind the fact that what IS there is a hell of a lot better than any government that's been available before - and constantly being improved. It's the typical leftist binary thinking - if it isn't PERFECT, it's WORTHLESS.

There's been a lot of changes in the last 236 years. I expect even more to come. But it would be well to remember that the Founding Fathers didn't think in binary - they thought about what could be accomplished... even if imperfectly.

J.

July 6, 2007

Economy sucks - news at Midnight...

Well, maybe it doesn't.

Comparing Economies: Two Respected Measures Put Bush 43's at or Near the Top | NewsBusters.org

Comparing Economies: Two Respected Measures Put Bush 43's at or Near the Top

Today's release of the Institute for Supply Management's Non-Manufacturing Activity Report, which measures business conditions in the 86% of the economy other than manufacturing, came in with a reading of 60.7, after recording a 59.7 last month.

As has been customary, the report whipped the pants off of "expectations." This Thomson Financial article at Forbes predicted a decline to 58.1 instead of the full-point increase that occurred, as did this AFX piece.

Unemployment's so low in our area that about one out of four fast-food places has a sign up for 'Help Wanted'. Most of the larger retail establishments are hiring, by the signs on their doors. Heck, even MicroCenter's hiring.

That they can't fill these jobs means one of two things... either the pay is so low that folks won't work for it (and when you can't find workers your choice is usually to pay more until you DO find someone) or there's just not sufficient warm bodies out there to fill the positions.

Interesting, isn't it?

J.

July 7, 2007

Losing? Winning? Losing?

Hard to tell, but this is interesting...

Power Line: Jihadists On Defense

On July 4, Zawahiri released a new video tape. The production values are pretty good, and Zawahiri is intercut with other footage, including television clips. What is striking about Zawahiri's message, however, is how defensive it is. And what Zawahiri is defensive about, is events in Iraq.

He begins by talking about Iraq, and that remains the main subject although there are passing references to other fields of battle. His theme on Iraq is the need for unity. Reading between the lines, you can tell that Muslims, including relatively radical Muslims, are distancing themselves from al Qaeda in Iraq, or, as Zawahiri calls it, the Islamic State of Iraq. He criticizes clerics who say there is no duty to carry out jihad in Iraq. He contrasts al Qaeda in Iraq favorably with Hamas, and complains that while Hamas receives near-universal support, al Qaeda in Iraq suffers from "a storm of media campaigns, allegations and claims ... whipped up in their face."

Like this?
Michael Yon : Online Magazine � Blog Archive � Baqubah Update: 05 July 2007

Speaking through an American interpreter, Lieutenant David Wallach who is a native Arabic speaker, the Iraqi official related how al Qaeda united these gangs who then became absorbed into “al Qaeda.” They recruited boys born during the years 1991, 92 and 93 who were each given weapons, including pistols, a bicycle and a phone (with phone cards paid) and a salary of $100 per month, all courtesy of al Qaeda. These boys were used for kidnapping, torturing and murdering people.

At first, he said, they would only target Shia, but over time the new al Qaeda directed attacks against Sunni, and then anyone who thought differently. The official reported that on a couple of occasions in Baqubah, al Qaeda invited to lunch families they wanted to convert to their way of thinking. In each instance, the family had a boy, he said, who was about 11 years old. As LT David Wallach interpreted the man’s words, I saw Wallach go blank and silent. He stopped interpreting for a moment. I asked Wallach, “What did he say?” Wallach said that at these luncheons, the families were sat down to eat. And then their boy was brought in with his mouth stuffed. The boy had been baked. Al Qaeda served the boy to his family.

One thing that's always astounded me about the media coverage in this war is that any HINT of misdoings by OUR troops are immediately trumpeted as true. Yet something like this... isn't it worth a few reporters? Michael Yon's done pretty well being an honest observer of this war (which is something the mainstream media have not) and it's interesting just how quickly something like this will get totally ignored. After all, it doesn't fit the script - that the US is uniquely bad and evil, and the saintly 'freedom fighters' can do no wrong. But back to poor Zawahiri, who's finding out that his 'friends' who are taking the label of Al Quaeda aren't doing the Cause any good at all.
In part, as many commentators have noted, Zawahiri's plea for unity in Iraq reflects the abandonment of al Qaeda by most Sunnis there, and the fact that many Sunnis have joined with the U.S. and the Iraqi government in fighting al Qaeda. But the defensiveness Zawahiri betrays goes well beyond that schism. He plainly is concerned about how things are going in Iraq, and is anxious to generate support for his organization's efforts there.
Hey, good beheading knives are expensive. Things are going badly in Iraq for Al Quaeda BECAUSE of the things Al Quaeda's doing - not because the people are somehow turning away from the kind and gentle message to continue their lives of sin and depravity... carrying tomatoes and cucumbers together without even THINKING about hot vegetable sex! Or soup, maybe...
I've never understood the theory that Iraq is somehow unrelated to the broader war on terror. It would not be possible to read what al Qaeda's leaders have written and listen to their tapes, and hold that view. At one point, Zawahiri exhorts his followers to "[h]urry to Afghanistan, to Iraq, hurry to Somalia, hurry to Palestine, and hurry to the towering Atlas Mountains." If we were to abandon Iraq, can anyone doubt that the flow of jihadists to those other regions, and more, would increase?
Ah, but the assumption is made that it's important - which it really isn't as long as the proper people (Democrats) are elected this next year.

But as I've said before - they'd better be careful what they wish for. The Democrats want control, but show no signs of having the first clue about what to do with it. The Republicans... sigh. We won't go there. Al Quaeda's been able to get in the door, but have made themselves such unpleasant guests that the infidel occupier is seen as preferable, which you've got to admit takes significant doing. To conclude, one final bit from Michael Yon's post....

The big news on the streets today is that the people of Baqubah are generally ecstatic, although many hold in reserve a serious concern that we will abandon them again. For many Iraqis, we have morphed from being invaders to occupiers to members of a tribe. I call it the “al Ameriki tribe,” or “tribe America.”

I’ve seen this kind of progression in Mosul, out in Anbar and other places, and when I ask our military leaders if they have sensed any shift, many have said, yes, they too sense that Iraqis view us differently. In the context of sectarian and tribal strife, we are the tribe that people can—more or less and with giant caveats—rely on.

Most Iraqis I talk with acknowledge that if it was ever about the oil, it’s not now. Not mostly anyway. It clearly would have been cheaper just to buy the oil or invade somewhere easier that has more. Similarly, most Iraqis seem now to realize that we really don’t want to stay here, and that many of us can’t wait to get back home. They realize that we are not resolved to stay, but are impatient to drive down to Kuwait and sail away. And when they consider the Americans who actually deal with Iraqis every day, the Iraqis can no longer deny that we really do want them to succeed. But we want them to succeed without us. We want to see their streets are clean and safe, their grass is green, and their birds are singing. We want to see that on television. Not in person. We don’t want to be here. We tell them that every day. It finally has settled in that we are telling the truth.

Now that all those realizations and more have settled in, the dynamics here are changing in palpable ways.

The world changes. The war changes. Some things get better, some worse. But Al Quaeda? They need to be destroyed - that's a solid constant.

J.

And so Giuliani erodes my support...

How can he be unaware of the Fairtax movement? Or if he is - how can he so quickly dismiss the idea behind it?

My Way News - Giuliani Jeered for Opposing Flat Tax

Several dozen people jeered when Giuliani, in response to a question, said he would not be in favor of a flat tax.

"I have to study it some more," the former New York City mayor said. "I don't think a flat tax is realistic change for America. Our economy is dependent upon the way our tax system operates."

Um, seems to me our tax system is dependent on the way our economy operates, not the other way around. Taxes, by themselves, produce NOTHING. The small business owner who has to pay 30% of his profits in taxes looks at that money go out the door and disappear. What could he do with a third to a half of that back? Taxes drop - the economy booms - the Dems raise taxes - the economy staggers - Republicans get in, drop taxes - the economy booms... what's not clear? Of course, it could be if the taxes were dropped TOO much, unemployment would drop to pretty much zero, which would decrease the number of people in need of government services, which would, in turn, require a scaling back of various bureaucracies. The deficit would disappear, there would be an actual SURPLUS, which could go to paying off the National Debt - and if we started that, who knows what could happen? Tomatoes and cucumbers living together! Human sacrifice! Mass hysteria!

Anyway, there you go - according to Giuliani, the economy is there to serve the government via taxation. As a supporter of the Fairtax, I'm afraid that he's just chalked up a strike as far as I'm concerned.

J.

July 8, 2007

You ain't gonna get to be Caliph...

If you won't even stay in the country you want to rule.

Reuters AlertNet - Iraq's Sadr back in Iran - U.S. military sources

BAGHDAD, July 8 (Reuters) - Fiery Iraqi Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr has gone back to neighbouring Iran, U.S. military sources in Baghdad said on Sunday.

Earlier this year, U.S. officials said the anti-American cleric was hiding in Iran to avoid a major security crackdown in Baghdad, although his aides say he never left Iraq.

"Our sources do show Moqtada in Iran," one U.S. military source said, declining to speculate on why Sadr had gone back.

A senior aide to Sadr denied the cleric had left Iraq.

Sadr disappeared from public view shortly before the launch of a U.S.-led offensive in Baghdad in February but re-emerged in the holy Shi'ite Iraqi city of Kufa on May 25.

You know, he's in a tough spot. He's not high enough on the enemy list to justify a JDAM, and he's not low enough to be safely ignored. However, the folks he's nominally 'leading' must be going "WTF? Every time he urges US to go out and find 72 virgins, he suddenly has pressing business in Iran. Why should we be listening to his bug-out ass?"

If he keeps this up, they're gonna unionize on him, and THEN where will he be? He'll be lucky to find a job at an Iranian Wal-Mart.

J.

July 9, 2007

Art.

An artist tries to provoke a reaction. So does a propagandist. However, it's not all all certain that the propagandist will be able to get the desired reaction, unless the audience is conditioned beforehand. And this 'art/propaganda' exhibit... well, it provoked an emotional reaction - but likely not the one expected.

Anti-American July 4th

July 4th in San Francisco. So many things to do!

Picture 5 - well, these folks haven't a clue about the military in the first place, so what could you really expect. Picture 7 - yep, clueless as hell about US history, and stupid to boot. Picture 11 - you ever wonder just WHY Capitalism has such a bad rap? It's because the Communist economies had a hell of time feeding their own people - so since Communism was perfect, anything less had to be worse. This looks more like what you'd expect from a Communist economy, to my thinking. For all the bitching about it, capitalism's done more for the average Joe than any other economic system.

Which brings me to picture 12. "Capitalism is suicide!" You know, I'd love to see just how much a joker who generated this on a computer (developed by capitalists) and printed it out either on his home printer (developed by capitalists) or at a local Kinkos' - (developed and RUN by capitalists) would like being in a society where the simple ownership of an unlicensed typewriter would be sufficent cause for years of prison or a death sentence. And what he'd replace capitalism with that would provide for him better.

And this one... Number 13. Wow.

You ain't gonna get a build like that on a Communist ration plan, let alone lip gloss and spandex.  And notice the legs - what'd he do, crib a base pic from the Rockette chorus line?


Number 13. You've GOT to laugh at this one. Big busty babes, zepellins, tanks - and the Red Star over all with a call for Rebellion. God, what goes through the mind of an artist that would produce something like this? It makes me wonder just how much support those fools calling for rebellion really expect, or is it a masturbatory exercise in self-delusion? (Considering the appearnce of the BBBabes, likely the latter.) Things are VERY good right now for the majority of people in the US, especially compared to what they might have 'when the Revolution comes'. Where do they think the incentive to overthrow the US government for some nebulous 'better' system (to be determined later) would come from? You've either got to have a LOT of people really dissatisfied with their lot, to the point where ANYTHING seems better than what they've got, or have a hell of a lot of charisma to persuade them to follow your lead. And so far, the folks on the left don't seem to have it, charisma-wise. (Witness the flaming failure of Air America...)

But I'm sure the artist had a good time 'working' on this poster. (Eww.) It's well done, for it's type. Pornographic in it's own way, with a nice promise of pneumatic goodies. 72 virgins, anyone? They're waiting, boys! Join the Rebellion today!

Something else odd...

Many of the posters were actually from Iran itself. And most were so "official"-seeming, so professionally crafted, it dawned on me that these entries were either designed and submitted by the government of Iran, or at the very least vetted and approved by the Iranian government, which apparently must have heard about a crazy American art exhibit in which there would be no curator, and decided to take advantage of the situation.

The organizers ended up getting more than they bargained for: they wanted artists to submit pseudo-propaganda, but what they got was real propaganda!

Oh, the irony of it all.

J.

When a Kennedy Speaks...

You're supposed to listen, right? Well, in this case, what authority does a Kennedy have re the environment?

U.S. leg of Live Earth hits key notes - Newsday.com

However, Etheridge aside, it was nonmusicians at this concert who made the most passionate pleas about demanding action for the environment. "Get rid of all these rotten politicians that we have in Washington, who are nothing more than corporate toadies," said Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the environmentalist author, president of Waterkeeper Alliance and Robert F. Kennedy's son, who grew hoarse from shouting. "This is treason. And we need to start treating them as traitors."

Pretty much squat, with that little statement.

You can't question global warming without being called a traitor? I realize hyperbolic rhetoric is about the only way they'll get attention - but seriously, when you're talking science you have to get a LOT of information and come up with theories to explain it. And so far, the 'Evil Man Causes Global Warming' theory just ain't holding much water.

And Live Earth... oddly enough, apparently all you had to do was listen for six minutes on-line to get credit for watching the whole concert.

I wonder how many people would be listed as watching if they'd required a whole half-hour?

J.

July 10, 2007

Simple Fun

Every so often you run across something that just brings a smile to your face. There's the LOLCats and associated memes, of course. But this... it's even simpler. Kind of a slow load, but it's worth it.

Don't forget to click.

J.

July 12, 2007

Anything to hurt Bush.

And if it means massive deaths and a country in chaos... who cares? It's on the other side of the world, and it's not too early to prep for the '08 elections! Hey, we KNOW who the enemy is, and it ain't Al Quaeda!

House OKs Plan to Withdraw US Troops

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Iraqi government is achieving only spotty military and political progress, the Bush administration conceded Thursday in an assessment that war critics quickly seized on as confirmation of their dire warnings. Within hours, the House voted to withdraw U.S. troops by spring.

That'll show those Iraqis who believe the US will stand by them!

Printable words fail me.

Here's the first comparision I thought of. In the American West, there was a modest, pretty much tacit guarantee of a rule of law. That some order would be kept in the towns, that there would be designated people to go out and hunt lawbreakers and investigate crimes. With that promise of stability, people moved out and communities flourished. Those who broke the law ended up in jail or dead - they didn't end up in control of the towns, imposing their brand of law on the area... at least, not for long.

We have been attempting to buck up the government and people of Iraq, hunting down those would would try to take over the country and trying to buy the people of Iraq enough time that they could stabilize and create a government of and by the people, and bulk up enough to fight those who would take over. With even a modest guarantee that the 'sherrif' will be there, they can do this. There's plenty of indication that the surge is working, and the Iraqi people are getting their shit together. So NOW is the time to hamstring the effort, bring the troops home, and watch Iraq go up in a lovely bonfire to hopefully light the way for the Democrats to take the Presidency in '08.

The 25-page administration report was issued in the fifth year of a war that has claimed the lives of more than 3,600 U.S. troops and is costing U.S. taxpayers an estimated $10 billion a month.

Bush announced last winter he was ordering thousands of additional troops to the war zone, but the full complement has only arrived in recent weeks. "The full surge in this respect has only just begun," the report said.

It warned of "tough fighting" during the summer as U.S. and Iraqi forces "seek to seize the initiative from early gains and shape conditions of longer-term stabilization."

The miltiary planners in WW2 would have been flabbergasted at such a LOW comparitive price for a war of the magnitude we fought... and won. Our economy isn't converted to a war footing, there no draft needed to replace the hundreds of men who died daily - and the cost of the war is a bare blip on our GDP. And it's too much? It's too hard? We can fight this war with essentially government pocket change and an all-volunteer force, and it's too difficult?

If we can't win when it's this EASY (and it IS easy by any historical sense) then we're going to have to do it again in a couple of decades, only the cost will be a hell of a lot higher. But that's after the '08 election, so IT DOESN'T MATTER!

What's the alternative? What can we expect if we pull out?

Hey, who really gives a rat's hindquarters? IT DOESN'T MATTER! After all, Iraq doesn't matter one bit, except as a weapon to hurt Bush. 25 million people we promised protection to... don't count one bit if it means that supporting them, supporting Bush, might lose support from the anti-war crowd. The folks voting today to pull out would quail at actually slaughtering any of the people in Iraq themselves, but they'll love every damn bit of the carnage when it comes because it can be used against Bush. (Who isn't running in '08, but that doesn't matter. It's beyond rationality now, it's the principle of the thing.)

And we will prove, for once and all, that there's not an ally on the planet that can trust us for aid or assistance in the fight against terrorism.

History will judge them harshly.... but then again, maybe not. They may well be looked upon as heros... by Al Quaeda.

I wish to hell I could persuade myself that it just doesn't matter.

You know, sometimes I wonder why I even bother. I'm sure there's got to be historians with democratic affiliations who are looking at the current stances of the Democratic party and are able to forecast what the results of the resulting policies will be, or even have enough sense to say to Pelosi "Um, you know that anything you say on the Floor will be on the web in about thirty seconds, and read in internet cafes throughout the ME moments later." Do they not care? Don't they see what the results are? My conclusion is that she doesn't care one bit about the long-term effects - being focused on the now is all, and the future can take care of itself (and be blamed on Bush, regardless.)

I'm sure there's a good number of people who can look at the whole picture and realize that although things aren't going really great that they aren't going badly and things ARE getting better. I'm aghast at what passes for complete reporting of the issues - and wonder if the media and Democratic Party realizes that their insane dislike of Bush is coming close to severe damage that will persist long after he's out of office.

And then I think of the little guy. I'd hoped he would grow up in a world free of nuclear war, and other types of warfare too... but it looks like that's not to be.

J.

July 13, 2007

A Michael Yon interview...

Hugh Hewitt

HH: Now yesterday, Harry Reid said on the floor of the Senate that the surge has failed. Do you think there’s any factual basis for making that assertion, Michael Yon, from what you’ve seen in Iraq over the last many months?
MY: He’s wrong, he’s wrong. It has absolutely not failed, and in fact, I’m finally willing to say it in public. I feel like it’s starting to succeed. And you know, I’m kind of stretching a little bit, because we haven’t gone too far into it, but I can see it from my travels around, for instance, in Anbar and out here in Diyala Province as well. Baghdad’s still very problematic. But there’s other areas where you can clearly see that there is a positive effect. And the first and foremost thing we have to do is knock down al Qaeda. And with them alienating so many Iraqis, I mean, they’re almost doing it for us. I mean, yeah, it takes military might to finally like wipe them out of Baquba, but it’s working. I mean, I sense that the surge is working. Reid is just wrong.

Of course, it all depends on what Reid is trying for, isn't it?

Remember - it's not about Iraq... it's about getting political power here in the US. If it requires burning a country, that's too bad.

J.

Abandoning History

Churchill dropped from England's history syllabus - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Britain's World War II prime minister Winston Churchill has been cut from a list of key historical figures recommended for teaching in English secondary schools, a government agency says.

The radical overhaul of the school curriculum for 11- to 14-year-olds is designed to bring secondary education up to date and allow teachers more flexibility in the subjects they teach, the Government said.

But although Adolf Hitler, Mahatma Gandhi, Joseph Stalin and Martin Luther King have also been dropped from the detailed guidance accompanying the curriculum, Sir Winston's exclusion is likely to leave traditionalists aghast.

A spokesman for the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority said the new curriculum, to be taught from September 2008, does not prescribe to teachers what they must include.

But he added: "Teachers know that they need to mention these pivotal figures. They don't need to be instructed by law to mention them in every history class.

Yeah - but as we're seeing in the US, what isn't mandated (and tested upon) isn't likely to get taught. So Britons end up learning about... what?

Beckham? Oh, wait. He's moved to the US... never mind.

J.

July 14, 2007

Doing what he should...

Kate O'Beirne & Rich Lowry on Iraq on National Review Online

Forget the leaks and the speculation, President George W. Bush is not looking for a way out of the surge and the Iraq war. In a session with about ten conservative journalists Friday afternoon, a confident and determined president made it clear that he is going to see the surge through, and will rely on General David Petraeus’s advice on how to proceed come September, regardless of the political climate in Washington.

The Democrats gain nothing from a success in Iraq, and stand to lose much. Which is why they're pushing so hard for a loss right now - it costs them nothing and may get them more support from the anti-war base.

That it'd screw over the folks in Iraq doesn't matter - it's not like they can VOTE or anything...

Hmmm. Wouldn't it be a kicker if Petraeus comes back in September and advises we make Iraq the 51st state? Think THAT would change the tactics of the folks in Washington?

President Bush understands the public frustration with the war: “We put highly trained sophisticated military people in harm’s way and they battle $100 IEDs.” He worries about “exhaustion as we’re dealing with these radicals who have a lot of energy and who aren’t going to be tired.” But he said he has “tools” in the debate, including “the bully pulpit and the ability to convince the American people.” He wants both to convince them that success is still possible, and “remind my fellow citizens of what the consequences of failure will be.”

He says he has four audiences when he broadcasts his commitment to the mission in Iraq: the American public; the American military and their families; the Iraqis (“because there are a lot of people who doubt America’s resolve”); and the enemy (“the enemy thinks that we are weak — they’re sophisticated people, and they listen to the debate”). As for that last audience, “I really think the additional forces into Iraq surprised them—a lot.”

Good. And I'm glad to see he's letting Patraeus guide him. I think he'll get a hell of a lot more accurate information and guidance from him than from Pelosi, Murtha, and Edwards.
Anbar isn’t as complicated as the rest of the country since there isn’t the element of sectarian conflict that there is in the rest of the country. President Bush talked of a “ground-up” approach to reconciliation. He said that security is most important, then other initiatives can come up behind, including “aggressive use of PRTs [provincial reconstruction teams] to convince local folks that life can progress even though they may have suspicion of the central government.” (Local elections is “one of the key reforms” because of the election boycotts that previously took place in the Sunni areas, he said.)

And when it comes to pouring resources into areas where the insurgency is chased out, “If the central government won’t do it, we will through PRTs.” He said he talked with leaders of some of the PRTs today, and “their question was ‘will we have the time?’“ “My answer is...I have got to get us in the position so we will have time.”

The people of Iraq aren't stupid. They realize they've got about 17 months, and then their future is up for grabs. The enemies of Iraq aren't stupid either - they know they've got about 17 months and then they could have a real good chance to take control of Iraq... so they've got to keep the Democrats on their side.

It's a bad time to be an Iraqi. You've got a powerful, but fickle, ally in the US, and you've got determined enemies in your neighbors who won't be going away soon. I can understand why some would be working the angles here, because no matter what happens, they're still going to have to be there.

J.

July 15, 2007

Oddest musical device I've seen in a while...

Duckon 2007-Steve Ward's Singing Tesla Coil video

And inferring a datum from the page, there are high-voltage cons called Teslathons, though Google's kind of sparse on info.

Guess they don't want just anyone playin' with sparks like that, though it would sure be a Darwinian means of self-selection for reading comprehension and the ability to follow common-sense safety rules...

J.

July 16, 2007

Osama Dead?

Breaking Al-Qaeda Code Islamically: New OBL Video Possibly Announcement Of His Death � Ali Eteraz

Osama Bin Laden recently emerged in a new video from Al-Qaeda in a 37 second clip, praising martyrdom. The rest of the forty minutes of the video was some kind of collage/montage of Al-Qaeda activity.
As quickly uncovered, the images of Osama are from a video shot in October 2001. Compare the pictures, including the leaves above him and the mountains behind him (h/t Hot Air):

If he isn't, he's got one hell of a continuity crew behind his production efforts.

A 37 second clip - non-specific, and shot about the same time as a 2001 video... I don't know, it's pretty hard to use this as proof he's still alive. I think he's pinin' for the fjords myself, and is decidedly an ex-parrot... most likely worm food since Tora Bora. But hey - he might show up in a video tomorrow showing a recent copy of the NYTimes (Home edition)... but I don't think so.

The speculation at the site here is that the folks releasing this clip are using it to prep the ground for his 'death' as a martyr, and for Zawahiri to put on the bulls-eye. (Or a red shirt, whichever gets more shots.) Osama's been a croaker for a long time, but they've been waiting for a proper 'figurehead' to take over.

Interesting speculation - and I can see the reasoning behind it. Zarqawi might have made the grade, if he hadn't gone stupidly homicidal. Zawahiri's longevity mean's he's about at the top of the dung heap, and there's nobody who's a serious threat to his power. So it's now time to anoint Osama's successor... but first, you have to get the cat up on the roof. (Two points to the first person who cut and pastes the full text of that joke into a comment.)

J.

July 18, 2007

Pushing to lose.

Not much time left - they'd better get a move on.

Gen. Pace Declares Iraq 'Sea Change' - TIME

In Washington on Monday, Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid said he would force the chamber's first all-night debate on the Iraq war Tuesday night in advance of a vote Wednesday on whether to bring home all combat troops by next spring. Republicans are using Senate rules to insist that the measure have 60 votes to pass — a de facto filibuster since it takes that many votes to cut off debate.

Pace conferred Monday with Petraeus and Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno, the No. 2 commander in Iraq, who said he did not currently foresee requesting more troops. "Right now I can't find an assessment where I would say I need more troops," Odierno said, adding that he is confident that by September he will be able to give Petraeus his advice on how the troop buildup is working.

"My assessment right now is, I need more time" to understand how the offensive targeting al-Qaida in Iraq is working and how it could lead to political progress. I'm seeing some progress now here in Iraq. We have really just started what the Iraqis term 'liberating' them from al-Qaida. What I've got to determine is what do I need in order to continue that progress so that the political piece can then take hold and Iraqi security forces can hold this for the long term."

But the long term's not important. At this point, to judge by the Democrats in Congress, Iraq's a lost cause. It's GOT to be a lost cause. They've staked out a position - and they've got damn near everything riding on making sure the Iraq Surge is a failure.

I heard a call (not sure by who) on the radio today that we need to evaluate the results of the surge NOW, not in September. Of course, it was 'for the soldiers' - but it sure seems the soldiers are more confident of success than the Democrats.

I've mentioned before that I REALLY don't think the Dems anticipate how much damage they're going to inflict if they force a loss in Iraq. The people of Iraq are gonna get screwed, of course. But do they really think there's not going to be any blowback? They're being very vocal on their anti-war agenda, and being very publically against the war... but they're gonna have a hell of a time disassociating themselves politically from the results of what they want. They're very much on record now - and it WILL affect the '08 election.

And if they manage to pull the troops out, the resulting carnage will be laid at THEIR feet, not at Bush's. I don't see appeasing their anti-war base will make up for the other losses they'll take.

J.

As long as it's non-binding...

GOP establishment rallies around Bush - John Bresnahan - Politico.com

At the same time, Senate Republicans pushed through a nonbinding resolution stating that "precipitous withdrawal" from Iraq would "create a safe haven for Islamic radicals, including Al Qaeda and Hezbollah, who are determined to attack the United States and (U.S.) allies." The vote was 94-3.

So we've got, what, 100 senators?

94 voted for this non-binding resolution.

The tally is here.

Byrd, Feingold, and Harkin voted against it.

Kerry and Kennedy, oddly enough, voted for it, as did Boxer and Obama.

Strange, isn't it? They're so wanting to see Iraq fail, but put things to a NONBINDING vote... and they won't vote to see it fall.

Of course, nonbinding resolutions don't mean anything.

J.

But the health care's free!

What more do you want?

Irritation grows over taxes - Aftenposten.no

Norwegians are among the most heavily taxed people in the world, and that in turn has made Norway one of the most expensive countries in which to live. Most accept the taxes they're ordered to pay on income and even net worth and property, but growing numbers are publicly complaining about sky-high taxes on everything from cars to fuel to consumer goods.

But, but...

There ain't no such thing as a free lunch, is there? Someone always pays the check, whether it's with 'free' healthcare or other social programs... and the money's got to come from somewhere.

So - take a look. This is the sort of system that the 'progressives' would like to inflict on the US. $16 glasses of wine, $9 for a gallon of gas, a 25% VAT on nearly all consumer taxes...

Look well at this - because it could be the future.

J.

July 19, 2007

Funny stuff..

In my post, Rusted Sky: As long as it's non-binding... Jason noted...

I think that they voted for it with a different idea of what "precipitous" means in this context.
Well, I've got to thank you, Jason, because it meant I had to search out and READ the whole thing. An amendment to an amendment... but it was findable. Here's the text, and my thoughts.
(a) Findings.--The Senate makes the following findings:

(1) A failed state in Iraq would become a safe haven for Islamic radicals, including al Qaeda and Hezbollah, who are determined to attack the United States and United States allies.

Yeah, got that...
(2) The Iraq Study Group report found that ``[a] chaotic Iraq could provide a still stronger base of operations for terrorists who seek to act regionally or even globally''.
That's pretty much a given...
(3) The Iraq Study Group noted that ``Al Qaeda will portray any failure by the United States in Iraq as a significant victory that will be featured prominently as they recruit for their cause in the region and around the world''.
Of course. (Which makes me wonder - the Dems apparently nonbindingly agree with this - so why are they so eager to hand it to Al Q? Oh, wait. It would harm Bush's chance for re-election.) (Wait - he's not running.)
(4) A National Intelligence Estimate concluded that the consequences of a premature withdrawal from Iraq would be that--

(A) Al Qaeda would attempt to use Anbar province to plan further attacks outside of Iraq;

(B) neighboring countries would consider actively intervening in Iraq; and

(C) sectarian violence would significantly increase in Iraq, accompanied by massive civilian casualties and displacement.

Why, you say that as if it's a bug and not a feature in the TrashBush 1.0 software!
(5) The Iraq Study Group found that ``a premature American departure from Iraq would almost certainly produce greater sectarian violence and further deterioration of conditions. . .. The near-term results would be a significant power vacuum, greater human suffering, regional destabilization, and a threat to the global economy. Al Qaeda would depict our withdrawal as a historic victory.''
Is there any doubt about this? They blow up a soldier, it's seen as a historic victory.
(6) A failed state in Iraq could lead to broader regional conflict, possibly involving Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey.
Again, they say that like it's a bad thing.
(7) The Iraq Study group noted that ``Turkey could send troops into northern Iraq to prevent Kurdistan from declaring independence''.
But it's on the other side of the world... who gives a rip?
(8) The Iraq Study Group noted that ``Iran could send troops to restore stability in southern Iraq and perhaps gain control of oil fields. The regional influence of Iran could rise at a time when that country is on a path to producing nuclear weapons.''
That'd be bad. Do we REALLY want them to re-establish the Persian Empire?
(9) A failed state in Iraq would lead to massive humanitarian suffering, including widespread ethnic cleansing and countless refugees and internally displaced persons, many of whom will be tortured and killed for having assisted Coalition forces.
And it'll all be Bush's fault! What's not to like?

Of course, if Saddam had died and left Iraq to his sons, then everything would have been fine. Well, unless you were an Iraqi.

(10) A recent editorial in the New York Times stated, ``Americans must be clear that Iraq, and the region around it, could be even bloodier and more chaotic after Americans leave. There could be reprisals against those who worked with American forces, further ethnic cleansing, even genocide. Potentially destabilizing refugee flows could hit Jordan and Syria. Iran and Turkey could be tempted to make power grabs.''
Land's land - and they're not making any more of it. Time to push the borders a bit?
(11) The Iraq Study Group found that ``[i]f we leave and Iraq descends into chaos, the long-range consequences could eventually require the United States to return''.
We do seem to have become the world's policeman, like it or not.
(b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that--

(1) the Senate should commit itself to a strategy that will not leave a failed state in Iraq; and

(2) the Senate should not pass legislation that will undermine our military's ability to prevent a failed state in Iraq.

Hmmm. Good luck there. I'll bet those senators are glad this was non-binding, because they're working overtime to try to blow 1 and 2.

Nothing about 'precipitous', oddly enough. I think they knew what they were voting for, but figured nobody would pay attention to it. And almost nobody did - this is another of those little bits and pieces that Congress tosses out that get lost among the rest of the garbage they generate.

J.

Yeah, they're serious about security.

Michelle Malkin � Don’t let the Dems kill the John Doe amendment
Update: House Dems kill John Doe amendment…fight moves to the Senate Update:
8:55pm Senate Dems kill John Doe amendment…roll added
The big question, however, is security for which side?

ROTR- The Democrats' Plan on Security

DAMN but I'm tired of seeing them do damn near everything they can to covertly help fundy Islam. Is this supposed to make us think they're serious about fighting the WoT? Or are they more worried about someone at CAIR getting offended by someone complaining about what could be a dry-run for an attack? Yeah, let the lawyers sort it all out - you'll end up with a public afraid to say or do anything, because some Muslim might take offense and sue their assets off.

Maybe, just maybe they've got something more going than a reflexive negativity, but I'm sure not seeing it.

J.

If he says it - it must be so... right?

Breitbart.tv � Kerry: No Bloodbath In Vietnam After US Redeployment

Sen. John Kerry said during a C-SPAN appearance that fears of a bloodbath after the US withdrawal from Vietnam never materialized. He says he's met survivors of the "reeducation camps" who are thriving in modern Vietnam. An award-winning investigation by the Orange County Register concludes that at least 165,000 people perished in the camps.

And that doesn't count folks who perished in the boatlift, who never made it to the camps, who were just shot out of hand... the total's been estimated up to about two million, but could well be more. And we won't talk about Cambodia - what was the count there, about three million? Yeah, those were good times indeed... for murdering bastards.

But in Kerry's mind... the Communists were apparently noble, gentle folks who carefully re-educated the population. Could it be Altzheimers?

We really dodged a bullet when he wasn't able to steal the election in '04. Bad as you think Bush might be - at least he's in this reality instead of whichever alternate Kerry came from.

J.

If he says it - it must be so... right?

Breitbart.tv � Kerry: No Bloodbath In Vietnam After US Redeployment

Sen. John Kerry said during a C-SPAN appearance that fears of a bloodbath after the US withdrawal from Vietnam never materialized. He says he's met survivors of the "reeducation camps" who are thriving in modern Vietnam. An award-winning investigation by the Orange County Register concludes that at least 165,000 people perished in the camps.

And that doesn't count folks who perished in the boatlift, who never made it to the camps, who were just shot out of hand... the total's been estimated up to about two million, but could well be more. And we won't talk about Cambodia - what was the count there, about three million? Yeah, those were good times indeed... for murdering bastards.

But in Kerry's mind... the Communists were apparently noble, gentle folks who carefully re-educated the population. Could it be Altzheimers?

We really dodged a bullet when he wasn't able to steal the election in '04. Bad as you think Bush might be - at least he's in this reality instead of whichever alternate Kerry came from.

J.

If he says it - it must be so... right?

Breitbart.tv � Kerry: No Bloodbath In Vietnam After US Redeployment

Sen. John Kerry said during a C-SPAN appearance that fears of a bloodbath after the US withdrawal from Vietnam never materialized. He says he's met survivors of the "reeducation camps" who are thriving in modern Vietnam. An award-winning investigation by the Orange County Register concludes that at least 165,000 people perished in the camps.

And that doesn't count folks who perished in the boatlift, who never made it to the camps, who were just shot out of hand... the total's been estimated up to about two million, but could well be more. And we won't talk about Cambodia - what was the count there, about three million? Yeah, those were good times indeed... for murdering bastards.

But in Kerry's mind... the Communists were apparently noble, gentle folks who carefully re-educated the population. Could it be Altzheimers?

We really dodged a bullet when he wasn't able to steal the election in '04. Bad as you think Bush might be - at least he's in this reality instead of whichever alternate Kerry came from.

J.

July 21, 2007

Sitting down and deciding the future.

Michael Yon : Online Magazine � Blog Archive � 7 Rules: 1 Oath

Today marks D 30 since the start of Operation Arrowhead Ripper. The initial goal of Arrowhead Ripper was to clear Baqubah of al Qaeda, and then attempt to “jump start” the city back into civic life, which had all but ceased while the terrorists were in control. Though relatively minor clearing operations are still underway, there is little combat in the city.

Today Colonel Steve Townsend, the American commander of the 3-2 Stryker Brigade Combat Team, presided over a meeting with Iraqi Army officers and former insurgent leaders. The insurgent leaders who seem to be sincerely working toward peace are now collectively referred to as “the Baqubah Guardians.” I was allowed to attend the meeting, but was—understandably—not permitted to photograph or videotape the proceedings.

The meeting is detalied, along with the 7 rules and 1 oath. The sheiks have had a bellyful of the fighting and killing, and are willing to cooperate and turn their area around. It's a very good start, and one which shows great promise.
Seeing “God is Great” written on the Iraqi flag might provoke some to protest “Why did we come here just to stand up a country who would write such things on their flag?” But I sat there in that meeting, which was completely civil and professional, and I thought about another flag, the one flying over South Carolina. Some people call that flag “heritage,” while others call it “hateful,” “painful” and “demeaning.” And today in that meeting, I thought about the descendants of slaves who are now top military commanders in the American Army, and in that moment I knew that Iraq could make it.
And in Washington - well, some are trying very hard to make it clear to the Iraqi government, and the terrorists that our patience isn't without limits. I'm all for wanting to see progress - but I'm also aware that this is going to take time and we will see setbacks along with the progress. However, with an election coming up next year, the pressure to bail is going to be high.
Commanders and U.S. envoy seek more time for Iraq - Print Version - International Herald Tribune

But senior lawmakers sought on Thursday to signal that they would regard September as a deadline for deciding the future of the American commitment to Iraq.

"We're not staying," added Senator Joseph R. Biden, the Delaware Democrat who is chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "You don't have much time."

At the Pentagon, Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno, the senior ground commander in Iraq, said that while he would be able to provide an assessment of the progress of the new military strategy in mid-September, it would take at least 45 days beyond that to know with more certainty whether the strategy was working.

"In order to do a good assessment I need at least until November," he said during a video briefing with Pentagon reporters.

General Odierno said there had been "significant success" in rooting out insurgents, both within Baghdad and in towns surrounding the capital. But in an implicit argument for more time, he said it would not be possible to know by September whether these were "just a blip."

How long does it take to build a country, when the countries around it are trying hard to tear it down? How long does it take to build a country, when there are those within it who see sowing distrust among political factions in that country as a means to gain power for THEIR faction?

How long does it take to fight an insurgency when weekly you have people WHO SHOULD BE SUPPORTING THAT FIGHT demanding we leave NOW, and doing damn near everything in their power to politically hamstring the President? How long does it take to get a government operational when the people in it who need your support are quite aware that support can disappear real damn quick if it's politically expedient for it to vanish?

FOXNews.com - Bush Calls on Congress to 'Rise Above Partisanship' on Iraq - Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Friday called on Congress to set aside partisanship in the increasingly tense Iraq debate and asked for patience on his strategy there even as administration officials set out to clarify apparently misinterpreted remarks by a general over when Congress next would be briefed on progress in Iraq.

Wouldn't it be a real hoot if the Democrats pulled another Viet Nam play and forced a withdrawl, and a bloodbath was started... but stopped when the government and people of Iraq realize they've got one final chance to get their shit together, at which point they stabilize the country and shove out all the foriegn jihadis? Think the Dems would be unhappy at the success of Iraq, or glad the country stabilized and try to take credit for it?

Now, extend it further. A Democratic president is elected in '08. Iran gets very shakey a year or two later, but tries to compensate by announcing they're working hard on a nuclear weapon. We know where the nuke complex is, only we need to stage in Iraq to get at it with the proper equipment and troops.

We request assistance from Iraq.

Iraq tells us to go piss up a rope.

We wouldn't help them, and now they won't help us. If a REPUBLICAN President were to ask, they say, they would seriously consider it. But a Democrat? No, because it's quite clear that the Democrats aren't friends of the Iraqi people, and they'd likely quit the attack before the job was half-complete.

And then, in the spirit of friendship that the Democrats demonstrated to the Iraqi people, the President of Iraq sends the President of the United States two things.

A 50 lb bag of Iraqi desert sand... and a rusty hammer.

J.

Sitting down and deciding the future.

Michael Yon : Online Magazine � Blog Archive � 7 Rules: 1 Oath

Today marks D 30 since the start of Operation Arrowhead Ripper. The initial goal of Arrowhead Ripper was to clear Baqubah of al Qaeda, and then attempt to “jump start” the city back into civic life, which had all but ceased while the terrorists were in control. Though relatively minor clearing operations are still underway, there is little combat in the city.

Today Colonel Steve Townsend, the American commander of the 3-2 Stryker Brigade Combat Team, presided over a meeting with Iraqi Army officers and former insurgent leaders. The insurgent leaders who seem to be sincerely working toward peace are now collectively referred to as “the Baqubah Guardians.” I was allowed to attend the meeting, but was—understandably—not permitted to photograph or videotape the proceedings.

The meeting is detalied, along with the 7 rules and 1 oath. The sheiks have had a bellyful of the fighting and killing, and are willing to cooperate and turn their area around. It's a very good start, and one which shows great promise.
Seeing “God is Great” written on the Iraqi flag might provoke some to protest “Why did we come here just to stand up a country who would write such things on their flag?” But I sat there in that meeting, which was completely civil and professional, and I thought about another flag, the one flying over South Carolina. Some people call that flag “heritage,” while others call it “hateful,” “painful” and “demeaning.” And today in that meeting, I thought about the descendants of slaves who are now top military commanders in the American Army, and in that moment I knew that Iraq could make it.
And in Washington - well, some are trying very hard to make it clear to the Iraqi government, and the terrorists that our patience isn't without limits. I'm all for wanting to see progress - but I'm also aware that this is going to take time and we will see setbacks along with the progress. However, with an election coming up next year, the pressure to bail is going to be high.
Commanders and U.S. envoy seek more time for Iraq - Print Version - International Herald Tribune

But senior lawmakers sought on Thursday to signal that they would regard September as a deadline for deciding the future of the American commitment to Iraq.

"We're not staying," added Senator Joseph R. Biden, the Delaware Democrat who is chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "You don't have much time."

At the Pentagon, Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno, the senior ground commander in Iraq, said that while he would be able to provide an assessment of the progress of the new military strategy in mid-September, it would take at least 45 days beyond that to know with more certainty whether the strategy was working.

"In order to do a good assessment I need at least until November," he said during a video briefing with Pentagon reporters.

General Odierno said there had been "significant success" in rooting out insurgents, both within Baghdad and in towns surrounding the capital. But in an implicit argument for more time, he said it would not be possible to know by September whether these were "just a blip."

How long does it take to build a country, when the countries around it are trying hard to tear it down? How long does it take to build a country, when there are those within it who see sowing distrust among political factions in that country as a means to gain power for THEIR faction?

How long does it take to fight an insurgency when weekly you have people WHO SHOULD BE SUPPORTING THAT FIGHT demanding we leave NOW, and doing damn near everything in their power to politically hamstring the President? How long does it take to get a government operational when the people in it who need your support are quite aware that support can disappear real damn quick if it's politically expedient for it to vanish?

FOXNews.com - Bush Calls on Congress to 'Rise Above Partisanship' on Iraq - Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Friday called on Congress to set aside partisanship in the increasingly tense Iraq debate and asked for patience on his strategy there even as administration officials set out to clarify apparently misinterpreted remarks by a general over when Congress next would be briefed on progress in Iraq.

Wouldn't it be a real hoot if the Democrats pulled another Viet Nam play and forced a withdrawl, and a bloodbath was started... but stopped when the government and people of Iraq realize they've got one final chance to get their shit together, at which point they stabilize the country and shove out all the foriegn jihadis? Think the Dems would be unhappy at the success of Iraq, or glad the country stabilized and try to take credit for it?

Now, extend it further. A Democratic president is elected in '08. Iran gets very shakey a year or two later, but tries to compensate by announcing they're working hard on a nuclear weapon. We know where the nuke complex is, only we need to stage in Iraq to get at it with the proper equipment and troops.

We request assistance from Iraq.

Iraq tells us to go piss up a rope.

We wouldn't help them, and now they won't help us. If a REPUBLICAN President were to ask, they say, they would seriously consider it. But a Democrat? No, because it's quite clear that the Democrats aren't friends of the Iraqi people, and they'd likely quit the attack before the job was half-complete.

And then, in the spirit of friendship that the Democrats demonstrated to the Iraqi people, the President of Iraq sends the President of the United States two things.

A 50 lb bag of Iraqi desert sand... and a rusty hammer.

J.

Sitting down and deciding the future.

Michael Yon : Online Magazine � Blog Archive � 7 Rules: 1 Oath

Today marks D 30 since the start of Operation Arrowhead Ripper. The initial goal of Arrowhead Ripper was to clear Baqubah of al Qaeda, and then attempt to “jump start” the city back into civic life, which had all but ceased while the terrorists were in control. Though relatively minor clearing operations are still underway, there is little combat in the city.

Today Colonel Steve Townsend, the American commander of the 3-2 Stryker Brigade Combat Team, presided over a meeting with Iraqi Army officers and former insurgent leaders. The insurgent leaders who seem to be sincerely working toward peace are now collectively referred to as “the Baqubah Guardians.” I was allowed to attend the meeting, but was—understandably—not permitted to photograph or videotape the proceedings.

The meeting is detalied, along with the 7 rules and 1 oath. The sheiks have had a bellyful of the fighting and killing, and are willing to cooperate and turn their area around. It's a very good start, and one which shows great promise.
Seeing “God is Great” written on the Iraqi flag might provoke some to protest “Why did we come here just to stand up a country who would write such things on their flag?” But I sat there in that meeting, which was completely civil and professional, and I thought about another flag, the one flying over South Carolina. Some people call that flag “heritage,” while others call it “hateful,” “painful” and “demeaning.” And today in that meeting, I thought about the descendants of slaves who are now top military commanders in the American Army, and in that moment I knew that Iraq could make it.
And in Washington - well, some are trying very hard to make it clear to the Iraqi government, and the terrorists that our patience isn't without limits. I'm all for wanting to see progress - but I'm also aware that this is going to take time and we will see setbacks along with the progress. However, with an election coming up next year, the pressure to bail is going to be high.
Commanders and U.S. envoy seek more time for Iraq - Print Version - International Herald Tribune

But senior lawmakers sought on Thursday to signal that they would regard September as a deadline for deciding the future of the American commitment to Iraq.

"We're not staying," added Senator Joseph R. Biden, the Delaware Democrat who is chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "You don't have much time."

At the Pentagon, Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno, the senior ground commander in Iraq, said that while he would be able to provide an assessment of the progress of the new military strategy in mid-September, it would take at least 45 days beyond that to know with more certainty whether the strategy was working.

"In order to do a good assessment I need at least until November," he said during a video briefing with Pentagon reporters.

General Odierno said there had been "significant success" in rooting out insurgents, both within Baghdad and in towns surrounding the capital. But in an implicit argument for more time, he said it would not be possible to know by September whether these were "just a blip."

How long does it take to build a country, when the countries around it are trying hard to tear it down? How long does it take to build a country, when there are those within it who see sowing distrust among political factions in that country as a means to gain power for THEIR faction?

How long does it take to fight an insurgency when weekly you have people WHO SHOULD BE SUPPORTING THAT FIGHT demanding we leave NOW, and doing damn near everything in their power to politically hamstring the President? How long does it take to get a government operational when the people in it who need your support are quite aware that support can disappear real damn quick if it's politically expedient for it to vanish?

FOXNews.com - Bush Calls on Congress to 'Rise Above Partisanship' on Iraq - Politics | Republican Party | Democratic Party | Political Spectrum

WASHINGTON — President Bush on Friday called on Congress to set aside partisanship in the increasingly tense Iraq debate and asked for patience on his strategy there even as administration officials set out to clarify apparently misinterpreted remarks by a general over when Congress next would be briefed on progress in Iraq.

Wouldn't it be a real hoot if the Democrats pulled another Viet Nam play and forced a withdrawl, and a bloodbath was started... but stopped when the government and people of Iraq realize they've got one final chance to get their shit together, at which point they stabilize the country and shove out all the foriegn jihadis? Think the Dems would be unhappy at the success of Iraq, or glad the country stabilized and try to take credit for it?

Now, extend it further. A Democratic president is elected in '08. Iran gets very shakey a year or two later, but tries to compensate by announcing they're working hard on a nuclear weapon. We know where the nuke complex is, only we need to stage in Iraq to get at it with the proper equipment and troops.

We request assistance from Iraq.

Iraq tells us to go piss up a rope.

We wouldn't help them, and now they won't help us. If a REPUBLICAN President were to ask, they say, they would seriously consider it. But a Democrat? No, because it's quite clear that the Democrats aren't friends of the Iraqi people, and they'd likely quit the attack before the job was half-complete.

And then, in the spirit of friendship that the Democrats demonstrated to the Iraqi people, the President of Iraq sends the President of the United States two things.

A 50 lb bag of Iraqi desert sand... and a rusty hammer.

J.

Yep, that about covers it...

Dr. Phat Tony's: The Difference

Fred Thompson and Hillary were walking down the street when they came to a homeless person.

The Republican, Fred Thompson, gave the homeless person his business card and told him to come to his office for a job. He then took $20 out of his pocket and gave it to the homeless person.

Hillary was very impressed, so when they came to another homeless person, she decided to help. She walked over to the homeless person and gave him directions to the welfare office. She then reached into Thompson's pocket and got out $20. She kept $15 for her administrative fees and gave the homeless person $5.

Now, do you understand the difference?

That sums it up pretty well. Democrats want to do well with YOUR money, while conservatives are more willing to give up their own cash.

Preview: ABC's John Stossel Highlights Greater Conservative Charitable Giving | NewsBusters.org

Funny, isn't it?

J.

Yep, that about covers it...

Dr. Phat Tony's: The Difference

Fred Thompson and Hillary were walking down the street when they came to a homeless person.

The Republican, Fred Thompson, gave the homeless person his business card and told him to come to his office for a job. He then took $20 out of his pocket and gave it to the homeless person.

Hillary was very impressed, so when they came to another homeless person, she decided to help. She walked over to the homeless person and gave him directions to the welfare office. She then reached into Thompson's pocket and got out $20. She kept $15 for her administrative fees and gave the homeless person $5.

Now, do you understand the difference?

That sums it up pretty well. Democrats want to do well with YOUR money, while conservatives are more willing to give up their own cash.

Preview: ABC's John Stossel Highlights Greater Conservative Charitable Giving | NewsBusters.org

Funny, isn't it?

J.

Yep, that about covers it...

Dr. Phat Tony's: The Difference

Fred Thompson and Hillary were walking down the street when they came to a homeless person.

The Republican, Fred Thompson, gave the homeless person his business card and told him to come to his office for a job. He then took $20 out of his pocket and gave it to the homeless person.

Hillary was very impressed, so when they came to another homeless person, she decided to help. She walked over to the homeless person and gave him directions to the welfare office. She then reached into Thompson's pocket and got out $20. She kept $15 for her administrative fees and gave the homeless person $5.

Now, do you understand the difference?

That sums it up pretty well. Democrats want to do well with YOUR money, while conservatives are more willing to give up their own cash.

Preview: ABC's John Stossel Highlights Greater Conservative Charitable Giving | NewsBusters.org

Funny, isn't it?

J.

Haven't got it yet...

But HP Book 7 should arrive tomorrow...

MSN Movies - Harry Potter

EDINBURGH, Scotland -- Harry Potter's life hangs in the balance. Millions of fans are holding their breath. Meanwhile, his creator is baking a cake, and keeping her secret.

On Saturday, readers around the globe will learn the schoolboy wizard's fate with the publication of "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows," the seventh and final book in J.K. Rowling's fantasy series. Will Harry defeat his evil nemesis, Lord Voldemort, and restore order to the wizarding world? Will he die in the attempt, as many fans fear, and as Rowling, an expert narrative tease, has hinted?

"Harry's story comes to a definite end in book seven," is all she will say a few days before publication, serving up tea and home-baked sponge cake in her comfortable Edinburgh house. Writing the final words of the saga felt "like a bereavement."

That sounds ominously final. So have we really seen the last of the staff and students of Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry?

"Because the world is so big, there would be room to do other stuff," Rowling says carefully. "I am not planning to do that, but I'm not going to say I'm never going to do it."

It'll be very interesting to see what happens - is he going to survive, or not?

For a number of years now, I've seen the HP saga as being something of an allegory of the prelude to WW2 - troubles brewing, with a government that steadfastly ignores them. Dumbledore was a rather Churchillian figure, but he got knocked off in the last book. So in this next book... I wonder whether the meme will continue. It does look like open warfare in the wizarding community is about to break out, and who will be the voice of sanity?

Then again, it could be total war, with Harry as the weapon too horrible to use. (Hey, Harry is da Bomb!) As such, it would make sense to have him take out Voldemort in the last chapter, and then die himself.

Well, guess I'll have tro read the book and see. One thing for sure, it's going to be difficult to keep from looking at the last pages!

J.

Haven't got it yet...

But HP Book 7 should arrive tomorrow...

MSN Movies - Harry Potter

EDINBURGH, Scotland -- Harry Potter's life hangs in the balance. Millions of fans are holding their breath. Meanwhile, his creator is baking a cake, and keeping her secret.

On Saturday, readers around the globe will learn the schoolboy wizard's fate with the publication of "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows," the seventh and final book in J.K. Rowling's fantasy series. Will Harry defeat his evil nemesis, Lord Voldemort, and restore order to the wizarding world? Will he die in the attempt, as many fans fear, and as Rowling, an expert narrative tease, has hinted?

"Harry's story comes to a definite end in book seven," is all she will say a few days before publication, serving up tea and home-baked sponge cake in her comfortable Edinburgh house. Writing the final words of the saga felt "like a bereavement."

That sounds ominously final. So have we really seen the last of the staff and students of Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry?

"Because the world is so big, there would be room to do other stuff," Rowling says carefully. "I am not planning to do that, but I'm not going to say I'm never going to do it."

It'll be very interesting to see what happens - is he going to survive, or not?

For a number of years now, I've seen the HP saga as being something of an allegory of the prelude to WW2 - troubles brewing, with a government that steadfastly ignores them. Dumbledore was a rather Churchillian figure, but he got knocked off in the last book. So in this next book... I wonder whether the meme will continue. It does look like open warfare in the wizarding community is about to break out, and who will be the voice of sanity?

Then again, it could be total war, with Harry as the weapon too horrible to use. (Hey, Harry is da Bomb!) As such, it would make sense to have him take out Voldemort in the last chapter, and then die himself.

Well, guess I'll have tro read the book and see. One thing for sure, it's going to be difficult to keep from looking at the last pages!

J.

Haven't got it yet...

But HP Book 7 should arrive tomorrow...

MSN Movies - Harry Potter

EDINBURGH, Scotland -- Harry Potter's life hangs in the balance. Millions of fans are holding their breath. Meanwhile, his creator is baking a cake, and keeping her secret.

On Saturday, readers around the globe will learn the schoolboy wizard's fate with the publication of "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows," the seventh and final book in J.K. Rowling's fantasy series. Will Harry defeat his evil nemesis, Lord Voldemort, and restore order to the wizarding world? Will he die in the attempt, as many fans fear, and as Rowling, an expert narrative tease, has hinted?

"Harry's story comes to a definite end in book seven," is all she will say a few days before publication, serving up tea and home-baked sponge cake in her comfortable Edinburgh house. Writing the final words of the saga felt "like a bereavement."

That sounds ominously final. So have we really seen the last of the staff and students of Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry?

"Because the world is so big, there would be room to do other stuff," Rowling says carefully. "I am not planning to do that, but I'm not going to say I'm never going to do it."

It'll be very interesting to see what happens - is he going to survive, or not?

For a number of years now, I've seen the HP saga as being something of an allegory of the prelude to WW2 - troubles brewing, with a government that steadfastly ignores them. Dumbledore was a rather Churchillian figure, but he got knocked off in the last book. So in this next book... I wonder whether the meme will continue. It does look like open warfare in the wizarding community is about to break out, and who will be the voice of sanity?

Then again, it could be total war, with Harry as the weapon too horrible to use. (Hey, Harry is da Bomb!) As such, it would make sense to have him take out Voldemort in the last chapter, and then die himself.

Well, guess I'll have tro read the book and see. One thing for sure, it's going to be difficult to keep from looking at the last pages!

J.

July 22, 2007

Book Came, Book Finished...

Got the HP book today in the mail - and I must admit my previous speculations were in error.

The Death Eaters behaved in the finest tradition of megalomanical thugs. And Snape... well, there was a surprise. Quite a few things were revealed, and certainly not all was as it seemed.

Harry's fate?

Well, you'll have to read the book. But if you're concerned, let's just say that what happened felt very right indeed.

J.

Book Came, Book Finished...

Got the HP book today in the mail - and I must admit my previous speculations were in error.

The Death Eaters behaved in the finest tradition of megalomanical thugs. And Snape... well, there was a surprise. Quite a few things were revealed, and certainly not all was as it seemed.

Harry's fate?

Well, you'll have to read the book. But if you're concerned, let's just say that what happened felt very right indeed.

J.

Book Came, Book Finished...

Got the HP book today in the mail - and I must admit my previous speculations were in error.

The Death Eaters behaved in the finest tradition of megalomanical thugs. And Snape... well, there was a surprise. Quite a few things were revealed, and certainly not all was as it seemed.

Harry's fate?

Well, you'll have to read the book. But if you're concerned, let's just say that what happened felt very right indeed.

J.

In regards to...

Some garbage put out by the New Republic the Democracy Project: Democracy Project has the following to say...


Great!... The New Republic can’t fact-check, The Weekly Standard can flounce indignantly, but it doesn’t do any fact-checking either, and now The American Spectator employs a staffer who likes to get his name in the papers who thinks fact-checking in looking something up on Google.

With the policy question of American involvement in Iraq squarely on the table, this is the kind of reporting we are supposed to rely upon? Is it any wonder that periodical circulation is collapsing and advertising is drying up?

The incidents concern soldiers insulting a female contractor who'd been disfigured by an IED, using a Bradley to run over dogs, and a soldier digging up mass grave putting the top of a kid's skull on his head (or helmet) and going around with it for the rest of the day.

All three sound like bullshit, and further reseach seems to indicate they didn't happen at all. Apparently Bradleys aren't the most maneuverable of vehicles, there weren't any mass graves found in the area the incident supposedly happened, and the making fun of a disfigured contractor... if she were so badly hurt, why was she still in Iraq - and the general consensus seems to be that the FOB dining hall where this supposedly occurred is so small an incident like what happened would have been impossible to miss.

However - it fits perfectly into a meta-narrative. Or soldiers are either innocent victims of a government who spends them like water, or they're brutal, heartless bastards who would desecrate kid's corpses for fun. Either way, it's a reason to get out of Iraq now and the sooner the better - right?

The closing paragraphs linked above have it right. I used to be able to somewhat trust Time and Newsweek years ago - but I haven't bought a copy in a long, long time. The cost is too high for the amount of information you get, and the journalism is of dubious integrity. I'd buy a copy of the National Enquirer first - at least THERE you know what you're getting. (And let's not forget the Weekly World News - at least they make no bones about their articles being mostly fiction.)

So now we're seeing attempts to discredit the soldiers, in the face of a desired retreat by the Democrats that would be in the worst interests of both our country and Iraq.

Welcome to the New VietNam. I've seen this movie before - and the ending truely sucks.

J.

In regards to...

Some garbage put out by the New Republic the Democracy Project: Democracy Project has the following to say...


Great!... The New Republic can’t fact-check, The Weekly Standard can flounce indignantly, but it doesn’t do any fact-checking either, and now The American Spectator employs a staffer who likes to get his name in the papers who thinks fact-checking in looking something up on Google.

With the policy question of American involvement in Iraq squarely on the table, this is the kind of reporting we are supposed to rely upon? Is it any wonder that periodical circulation is collapsing and advertising is drying up?

The incidents concern soldiers insulting a female contractor who'd been disfigured by an IED, using a Bradley to run over dogs, and a soldier digging up mass grave putting the top of a kid's skull on his head (or helmet) and going around with it for the rest of the day.

All three sound like bullshit, and further reseach seems to indicate they didn't happen at all. Apparently Bradleys aren't the most maneuverable of vehicles, there weren't any mass graves found in the area the incident supposedly happened, and the making fun of a disfigured contractor... if she were so badly hurt, why was she still in Iraq - and the general consensus seems to be that the FOB dining hall where this supposedly occurred is so small an incident like what happened would have been impossible to miss.

However - it fits perfectly into a meta-narrative. Or soldiers are either innocent victims of a government who spends them like water, or they're brutal, heartless bastards who would desecrate kid's corpses for fun. Either way, it's a reason to get out of Iraq now and the sooner the better - right?

The closing paragraphs linked above have it right. I used to be able to somewhat trust Time and Newsweek years ago - but I haven't bought a copy in a long, long time. The cost is too high for the amount of information you get, and the journalism is of dubious integrity. I'd buy a copy of the National Enquirer first - at least THERE you know what you're getting. (And let's not forget the Weekly World News - at least they make no bones about their articles being mostly fiction.)

So now we're seeing attempts to discredit the soldiers, in the face of a desired retreat by the Democrats that would be in the worst interests of both our country and Iraq.

Welcome to the New VietNam. I've seen this movie before - and the ending truely sucks.

J.

In regards to...

Some garbage put out by the New Republic the Democracy Project: Democracy Project has the following to say...


Great!... The New Republic can’t fact-check, The Weekly Standard can flounce indignantly, but it doesn’t do any fact-checking either, and now The American Spectator employs a staffer who likes to get his name in the papers who thinks fact-checking in looking something up on Google.

With the policy question of American involvement in Iraq squarely on the table, this is the kind of reporting we are supposed to rely upon? Is it any wonder that periodical circulation is collapsing and advertising is drying up?

The incidents concern soldiers insulting a female contractor who'd been disfigured by an IED, using a Bradley to run over dogs, and a soldier digging up mass grave putting the top of a kid's skull on his head (or helmet) and going around with it for the rest of the day.

All three sound like bullshit, and further reseach seems to indicate they didn't happen at all. Apparently Bradleys aren't the most maneuverable of vehicles, there weren't any mass graves found in the area the incident supposedly happened, and the making fun of a disfigured contractor... if she were so badly hurt, why was she still in Iraq - and the general consensus seems to be that the FOB dining hall where this supposedly occurred is so small an incident like what happened would have been impossible to miss.

However - it fits perfectly into a meta-narrative. Or soldiers are either innocent victims of a government who spends them like water, or they're brutal, heartless bastards who would desecrate kid's corpses for fun. Either way, it's a reason to get out of Iraq now and the sooner the better - right?

The closing paragraphs linked above have it right. I used to be able to somewhat trust Time and Newsweek years ago - but I haven't bought a copy in a long, long time. The cost is too high for the amount of information you get, and the journalism is of dubious integrity. I'd buy a copy of the National Enquirer first - at least THERE you know what you're getting. (And let's not forget the Weekly World News - at least they make no bones about their articles being mostly fiction.)

So now we're seeing attempts to discredit the soldiers, in the face of a desired retreat by the Democrats that would be in the worst interests of both our country and Iraq.

Welcome to the New VietNam. I've seen this movie before - and the ending truely sucks.

J.

Cultural Diversity...

We must be sensitive to other cultures. Although...

FOXNews.com - Alleged Child Rapist Goes Free Because Court Can't Find Interpreter - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News

ROCKVILLE, Md. — Charges against a man accused of repeatedly raping and molesting a 7-year-old girl were dismissed last week because the court could not find an interpreter fluent in the suspect's native West African language.

Mahamu Kanneh, a Liberian native who received asylum in this country and attended high school and community college here, according to The Washington Post, was denied a speedy trial after three years awaiting a court-appointed interpreter who could speak the tribal language of Vai.

... you'd think that high school and community college here would imply that the Kanneh was fluent enough in English to understand what he was doing was a crime. But that wouldn't seem to be the case.
A court-ordered psychiatrist determined that Kanneh, despite his functional facility with English — he originally spoke with detectives in English, The Post reports, needed to have Vai spoken in order to understand the proceedings against him.
What part of "You raped a 7-year-old, and you're going to go to jail for it." would need to be translated?

Sorry, I'm afraid I'm just not properly sympathetic to this... pervert.

FOX News spoke with a man who claimed to be Kanneh in a five-minute phone conversation on Sunday in English. He said the allegations against him were false and the dismissal of the charges was "a good thing." Asked if the accusations were true, he responded, "I said what I had to say" and hung up.
Yeah, it sounds like he needed an interpreter, all right.

J.

Cultural Diversity...

We must be sensitive to other cultures. Although...

FOXNews.com - Alleged Child Rapist Goes Free Because Court Can't Find Interpreter - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News

ROCKVILLE, Md. — Charges against a man accused of repeatedly raping and molesting a 7-year-old girl were dismissed last week because the court could not find an interpreter fluent in the suspect's native West African language.

Mahamu Kanneh, a Liberian native who received asylum in this country and attended high school and community college here, according to The Washington Post, was denied a speedy trial after three years awaiting a court-appointed interpreter who could speak the tribal language of Vai.

... you'd think that high school and community college here would imply that the Kanneh was fluent enough in English to understand what he was doing was a crime. But that wouldn't seem to be the case.
A court-ordered psychiatrist determined that Kanneh, despite his functional facility with English — he originally spoke with detectives in English, The Post reports, needed to have Vai spoken in order to understand the proceedings against him.
What part of "You raped a 7-year-old, and you're going to go to jail for it." would need to be translated?

Sorry, I'm afraid I'm just not properly sympathetic to this... pervert.

FOX News spoke with a man who claimed to be Kanneh in a five-minute phone conversation on Sunday in English. He said the allegations against him were false and the dismissal of the charges was "a good thing." Asked if the accusations were true, he responded, "I said what I had to say" and hung up.
Yeah, it sounds like he needed an interpreter, all right.

J.

Cultural Diversity...

We must be sensitive to other cultures. Although...

FOXNews.com - Alleged Child Rapist Goes Free Because Court Can't Find Interpreter - Local News | News Articles | National News | US News

ROCKVILLE, Md. — Charges against a man accused of repeatedly raping and molesting a 7-year-old girl were dismissed last week because the court could not find an interpreter fluent in the suspect's native West African language.

Mahamu Kanneh, a Liberian native who received asylum in this country and attended high school and community college here, according to The Washington Post, was denied a speedy trial after three years awaiting a court-appointed interpreter who could speak the tribal language of Vai.

... you'd think that high school and community college here would imply that the Kanneh was fluent enough in English to understand what he was doing was a crime. But that wouldn't seem to be the case.
A court-ordered psychiatrist determined that Kanneh, despite his functional facility with English — he originally spoke with detectives in English, The Post reports, needed to have Vai spoken in order to understand the proceedings against him.
What part of "You raped a 7-year-old, and you're going to go to jail for it." would need to be translated?

Sorry, I'm afraid I'm just not properly sympathetic to this... pervert.

FOX News spoke with a man who claimed to be Kanneh in a five-minute phone conversation on Sunday in English. He said the allegations against him were false and the dismissal of the charges was "a good thing." Asked if the accusations were true, he responded, "I said what I had to say" and hung up.
Yeah, it sounds like he needed an interpreter, all right.

J.

July 23, 2007

A condemnation...

Does rap reflect the culture it comes from, or does rap cause the culture that generates it?

In the Heart of Freedom, in Chains by Myron Magnet, City Journal Summer 2007

The great accomplishment of civilization has been to replace the reign of force with the rule of law, and to humanize the animal realities in which our lives are embedded by means of manners and rituals that give those realities a human meaning. And if the rule of law fares poorly in rap, civilization’s great effort to transform the animal facts of reproduction into love and marriage doesn’t do so well in gangsta-land, either. This is what so much of our culture is about—our manners and morals, poetry and song and film, from the Song of Solomon and the medieval French romances to “The Way You Look Tonight”: yes, I have these feelings, but not just for anyone; it’s you personally I love, so much that I want you always. And many of the popular songs of the 1940s and 1950s, making the promise of permanence explicit, end with talk of marriage. Human beings undergo an education of the feelings, and popular culture’s love songs were once great instructors in this school.

It’s a long drop to the dogghouse and Doggystyle. And since it’s culture that molds feelings and behavior, when the “Why don’t we do it in the road” spirit of sexual liberation of the 1960s declined in the ghetto into “Do you want it over here? Do you want it over there?,” feelings and behavior were bound to follow. Rap is a school that hardens and coarsens rather than cultivates the feelings and, presenting women as disposable and interchangeable objects for use, dehumanizes rather than humanizes the relations between the sexes.

While middle-class people, black and white, have other cultural influences—including loving, caring families, helpful in cultivating a child’s capacity to love—to counteract the dogghouse, the most vulnerable don’t. And while, of course, people do fall in love in the inner cities, it’s not enough to preempt the attitudes that, as Kay S. Hymowitz has shown, lead ghetto girls onto the “teen-mommy track”: that you can’t count on men, that they’re such animals that nobody needs or wants one around the house, that using them to get pregnant without expecting them to be fathers to your children is normal and fine. The men won’t love you, but the baby will—an expectation so often disappointed, with tragic results for the baby and society.

There's a theory I read a long time ago that in order for a concept or idea to survive, there has to be a word associated with it and that word has to be known to the people as a definition of that concept.

Conversely, an idea cannot survive if it can't be expressed. Control and limit the vocabulary, and you control the thoughts of the speaker.

I was going to write more, but I can't make it gel. Maybe if I get some sleep...

This is a rather long essay, but it's worth the read.

J.

A condemnation...

Does rap reflect the culture it comes from, or does rap cause the culture that generates it?

In the Heart of Freedom, in Chains by Myron Magnet, City Journal Summer 2007

The great accomplishment of civilization has been to replace the reign of force with the rule of law, and to humanize the animal realities in which our lives are embedded by means of manners and rituals that give those realities a human meaning. And if the rule of law fares poorly in rap, civilization’s great effort to transform the animal facts of reproduction into love and marriage doesn’t do so well in gangsta-land, either. This is what so much of our culture is about—our manners and morals, poetry and song and film, from the Song of Solomon and the medieval French romances to “The Way You Look Tonight”: yes, I have these feelings, but not just for anyone; it’s you personally I love, so much that I want you always. And many of the popular songs of the 1940s and 1950s, making the promise of permanence explicit, end with talk of marriage. Human beings undergo an education of the feelings, and popular culture’s love songs were once great instructors in this school.

It’s a long drop to the dogghouse and Doggystyle. And since it’s culture that molds feelings and behavior, when the “Why don’t we do it in the road” spirit of sexual liberation of the 1960s declined in the ghetto into “Do you want it over here? Do you want it over there?,” feelings and behavior were bound to follow. Rap is a school that hardens and coarsens rather than cultivates the feelings and, presenting women as disposable and interchangeable objects for use, dehumanizes rather than humanizes the relations between the sexes.

While middle-class people, black and white, have other cultural influences—including loving, caring families, helpful in cultivating a child’s capacity to love—to counteract the dogghouse, the most vulnerable don’t. And while, of course, people do fall in love in the inner cities, it’s not enough to preempt the attitudes that, as Kay S. Hymowitz has shown, lead ghetto girls onto the “teen-mommy track”: that you can’t count on men, that they’re such animals that nobody needs or wants one around the house, that using them to get pregnant without expecting them to be fathers to your children is normal and fine. The men won’t love you, but the baby will—an expectation so often disappointed, with tragic results for the baby and society.

There's a theory I read a long time ago that in order for a concept or idea to survive, there has to be a word associated with it and that word has to be known to the people as a definition of that concept.

Conversely, an idea cannot survive if it can't be expressed. Control and limit the vocabulary, and you control the thoughts of the speaker.

I was going to write more, but I can't make it gel. Maybe if I get some sleep...

This is a rather long essay, but it's worth the read.

J.

A condemnation...

Does rap reflect the culture it comes from, or does rap cause the culture that generates it?

In the Heart of Freedom, in Chains by Myron Magnet, City Journal Summer 2007

The great accomplishment of civilization has been to replace the reign of force with the rule of law, and to humanize the animal realities in which our lives are embedded by means of manners and rituals that give those realities a human meaning. And if the rule of law fares poorly in rap, civilization’s great effort to transform the animal facts of reproduction into love and marriage doesn’t do so well in gangsta-land, either. This is what so much of our culture is about—our manners and morals, poetry and song and film, from the Song of Solomon and the medieval French romances to “The Way You Look Tonight”: yes, I have these feelings, but not just for anyone; it’s you personally I love, so much that I want you always. And many of the popular songs of the 1940s and 1950s, making the promise of permanence explicit, end with talk of marriage. Human beings undergo an education of the feelings, and popular culture’s love songs were once great instructors in this school.

It’s a long drop to the dogghouse and Doggystyle. And since it’s culture that molds feelings and behavior, when the “Why don’t we do it in the road” spirit of sexual liberation of the 1960s declined in the ghetto into “Do you want it over here? Do you want it over there?,” feelings and behavior were bound to follow. Rap is a school that hardens and coarsens rather than cultivates the feelings and, presenting women as disposable and interchangeable objects for use, dehumanizes rather than humanizes the relations between the sexes.

While middle-class people, black and white, have other cultural influences—including loving, caring families, helpful in cultivating a child’s capacity to love—to counteract the dogghouse, the most vulnerable don’t. And while, of course, people do fall in love in the inner cities, it’s not enough to preempt the attitudes that, as Kay S. Hymowitz has shown, lead ghetto girls onto the “teen-mommy track”: that you can’t count on men, that they’re such animals that nobody needs or wants one around the house, that using them to get pregnant without expecting them to be fathers to your children is normal and fine. The men won’t love you, but the baby will—an expectation so often disappointed, with tragic results for the baby and society.

There's a theory I read a long time ago that in order for a concept or idea to survive, there has to be a word associated with it and that word has to be known to the people as a definition of that concept.

Conversely, an idea cannot survive if it can't be expressed. Control and limit the vocabulary, and you control the thoughts of the speaker.

I was going to write more, but I can't make it gel. Maybe if I get some sleep...

This is a rather long essay, but it's worth the read.

J.

July 24, 2007

Considering the source...

An Iraqi's progress report - Los Angeles Times

Baghdad — IN THE AMERICAN media, Iraq's steady progress toward security is frequently overshadowed by news of the latest act of mass terrorism. Yet for those of us who actually live here, progress is visible to all but the most irreconcilable skeptics. Just this week, Ashraf Jehangir Qazi, the United Nations' special representative for Iraq, announced at a news conference in Baghdad that Iraq had achieved, or at least started to achieve, 75% of the benchmarks it set for itself in the U.N.-led International Compact with Iraq.

The military force increase by the United States called "the surge" is only one element in the Iraqi and coalition strategy. The other elements are the political/diplomatic initiatives and economic progress — and the reality is that the strategy is working in spite of the monumental obstacles presented by international terrorists and difficult conditions inside Iraq.

Iraqi and coalition security forces are having major success against Al Qaeda and some of the other groups that are the principal sources of the violence that aims to overthrow our young democracy. From Al Anbar to Diyala, from Nineveh to Basra, the atrocities of the terrorists against our people are backfiring, and our citizens are coming forward to offer themselves to counter them.

I might be wrong, but could a tipping point have been reached? A point where it's no longer possible to ignore and denigrate the progress in Iraq?

This from the LA Times... If something like it comes out in the NY Times, then we're really making progress!

J.

Considering the source...

An Iraqi's progress report - Los Angeles Times

Baghdad — IN THE AMERICAN media, Iraq's steady progress toward security is frequently overshadowed by news of the latest act of mass terrorism. Yet for those of us who actually live here, progress is visible to all but the most irreconcilable skeptics. Just this week, Ashraf Jehangir Qazi, the United Nations' special representative for Iraq, announced at a news conference in Baghdad that Iraq had achieved, or at least started to achieve, 75% of the benchmarks it set for itself in the U.N.-led International Compact with Iraq.

The military force increase by the United States called "the surge" is only one element in the Iraqi and coalition strategy. The other elements are the political/diplomatic initiatives and economic progress — and the reality is that the strategy is working in spite of the monumental obstacles presented by international terrorists and difficult conditions inside Iraq.

Iraqi and coalition security forces are having major success against Al Qaeda and some of the other groups that are the principal sources of the violence that aims to overthrow our young democracy. From Al Anbar to Diyala, from Nineveh to Basra, the atrocities of the terrorists against our people are backfiring, and our citizens are coming forward to offer themselves to counter them.

I might be wrong, but could a tipping point have been reached? A point where it's no longer possible to ignore and denigrate the progress in Iraq?

This from the LA Times... If something like it comes out in the NY Times, then we're really making progress!

J.

The Quiet Majority

FOXNews.com - Survey: Muslims Around World Rejecting Islamic Extremism - International News | News of the World | Middle East News | Europe News

Muslims around the world increasingly reject suicide bombings and other violence against civilians, according to a new international poll dealing with how the world's population judges their lives, countries and national institutions.

A wide ranging survey of international attitudes in 47 countries by the Pew Research Center also reported that in many of the countries where support for suicide attacks has declined, there has also has been decreasing support for Al Qaeda leader Usama Bin Laden.

The 95-page survey found that surging economic growth in many developing countries has encouraged people in these countries to express satisfaction with their personal lives, family income and national conditions, said Andrew Kohut, the center's director.

It's often puzzled me that there's not been a very loud outcry against terrorism in the Muslim community. Does silence equal tacit consent?

Maybe not.

J.

The Quiet Majority

FOXNews.com - Survey: Muslims Around World Rejecting Islamic Extremism - International News | News of the World | Middle East News | Europe News

Muslims around the world increasingly reject suicide bombings and other violence against civilians, according to a new international poll dealing with how the world's population judges their lives, countries and national institutions.

A wide ranging survey of international attitudes in 47 countries by the Pew Research Center also reported that in many of the countries where support for suicide attacks has declined, there has also has been decreasing support for Al Qaeda leader Usama Bin Laden.

The 95-page survey found that surging economic growth in many developing countries has encouraged people in these countries to express satisfaction with their personal lives, family income and national conditions, said Andrew Kohut, the center's director.

It's often puzzled me that there's not been a very loud outcry against terrorism in the Muslim community. Does silence equal tacit consent?

Maybe not.

J.

Fashionable Elitism...

The Most Important Person You’ve Never Heard Of — AMERICAN.COM: A Magazine of Ideas, Online

Dr. Borlaug’s contributions have been credited with saving the lives of over 1 billion people and are the key ingredient in what is popularly known as the “Green Revolution.” His work won him the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970.

Norman Borlaug has saved more lives than any person currently living. Indeed, he may have saved more lives than anyone who has ever lived.The Green Revolution helped avert the Malthusian vision of people like Paul Ehrlich, who famously predicted the onset of mass starvation and famine during the 1970s and 1980s (Ehrlich famously lost a bet on this score with Julian Simon). Dr. Borlaug’s methods are now at work in Asia and Africa, and if they meet with the same success that they did in Mexico, India and Pakistan, starvation and famine in these places will be made much rarer, if not wiped out altogether.

But no good deed goes unpunished. Environmental lobbyists sought to put limits on Dr. Borlaug’s invention, arguing that high-yield wheat threatens the environment in the developing world. Sponsoring organizations that helped back the Green Revolution—the World Bank, the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation among them—were persuaded by the environmental lobby in the early 1980s to stop backing efforts to introduce high-yield crops in Africa. Dr. Borlaug’s response to this illogical and immoral effort to keep people from starving to death was as devastating as it was accurate:

Some of the environmental lobbyists of the Western nations are the salt of the earth, but many of them are elitists. They've never experienced the physical sensation of hunger. They do their lobbying from comfortable office suites in Washington or Brussels. If they lived just one month amid the misery of the developing world, as I have for fifty years, they'd be crying out for tractors and fertilizer and irrigation canals and be outraged that fashionable elitists back home were trying to deny them these things.
As Dr. Borlaug puts it, “One of the greatest threats to mankind today is that the world may be choked by an explosively pervading but well camouflaged bureaucracy.” That bureaucracy includes the panoply of environmental interest groups that threaten to suffocate innovations like the Green Revolution that are dedicated to eradicating hunger worldwide. And the key figures in that bureaucracy continue to maintain influence despite the fact that their predictions are so consistently wrong. Dr. Borlaug has a theory about one of the doomsday men: “I guess it sells. I guess what he writes has a lot to do with raising funds.”
That's the most important thing, right? After all, it's hard to convince third-world countries that they shouldn't have decent seed stock - it's a lot better to get people in first-world countries to agitate against the third-world using GM grains, or even decent hybrids.
Why is it that Dr. Borlaug’s track record is so unknown while people like Ehrlich and Brown continue to generate headlines with inaccurate predictions of doom? A reader responding to a blog post by Glenn “InstaPundit” Reynolds that noted the award of the Congressional Gold Medal to Dr. Borlaug probably put it best:
It's not because he spent his life serving the poor, per se. Press accounts are filled with stories about those who serve the poor. It's that Mr. Borlaug didn't serve the poor by giving away other people's money, or by demanding that other people give away their money. He served the poor by DEVELOPING TECHNOLOGY, which in the view of the press is just as evil as making money, if for no other reason than someone makes money from the developed technology.

Think about it: You seldom see accolades afforded all the brilliant researchers at GE Medical Systems, Pfizer, Merck, Glaxo, Medtronic, or you name it, for precisely the same reason.

Fame is not needed to justify or validate the life and achievements of Norman Borlaug. But fame and respect are due to him nevertheless for the astonishing contribution he has made to the quality of life around the world.

Thank you, Dr. Borlaug. Billions go to bed without hunger thanks to you.

J.

Fashionable Elitism...

The Most Important Person You’ve Never Heard Of — AMERICAN.COM: A Magazine of Ideas, Online

Dr. Borlaug’s contributions have been credited with saving the lives of over 1 billion people and are the key ingredient in what is popularly known as the “Green Revolution.” His work won him the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970.

Norman Borlaug has saved more lives than any person currently living. Indeed, he may have saved more lives than anyone who has ever lived.The Green Revolution helped avert the Malthusian vision of people like Paul Ehrlich, who famously predicted the onset of mass starvation and famine during the 1970s and 1980s (Ehrlich famously lost a bet on this score with Julian Simon). Dr. Borlaug’s methods are now at work in Asia and Africa, and if they meet with the same success that they did in Mexico, India and Pakistan, starvation and famine in these places will be made much rarer, if not wiped out altogether.

But no good deed goes unpunished. Environmental lobbyists sought to put limits on Dr. Borlaug’s invention, arguing that high-yield wheat threatens the environment in the developing world. Sponsoring organizations that helped back the Green Revolution—the World Bank, the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation among them—were persuaded by the environmental lobby in the early 1980s to stop backing efforts to introduce high-yield crops in Africa. Dr. Borlaug’s response to this illogical and immoral effort to keep people from starving to death was as devastating as it was accurate:

Some of the environmental lobbyists of the Western nations are the salt of the earth, but many of them are elitists. They've never experienced the physical sensation of hunger. They do their lobbying from comfortable office suites in Washington or Brussels. If they lived just one month amid the misery of the developing world, as I have for fifty years, they'd be crying out for tractors and fertilizer and irrigation canals and be outraged that fashionable elitists back home were trying to deny them these things.
As Dr. Borlaug puts it, “One of the greatest threats to mankind today is that the world may be choked by an explosively pervading but well camouflaged bureaucracy.” That bureaucracy includes the panoply of environmental interest groups that threaten to suffocate innovations like the Green Revolution that are dedicated to eradicating hunger worldwide. And the key figures in that bureaucracy continue to maintain influence despite the fact that their predictions are so consistently wrong. Dr. Borlaug has a theory about one of the doomsday men: “I guess it sells. I guess what he writes has a lot to do with raising funds.”
That's the most important thing, right? After all, it's hard to convince third-world countries that they shouldn't have decent seed stock - it's a lot better to get people in first-world countries to agitate against the third-world using GM grains, or even decent hybrids.
Why is it that Dr. Borlaug’s track record is so unknown while people like Ehrlich and Brown continue to generate headlines with inaccurate predictions of doom? A reader responding to a blog post by Glenn “InstaPundit” Reynolds that noted the award of the Congressional Gold Medal to Dr. Borlaug probably put it best:
It's not because he spent his life serving the poor, per se. Press accounts are filled with stories about those who serve the poor. It's that Mr. Borlaug didn't serve the poor by giving away other people's money, or by demanding that other people give away their money. He served the poor by DEVELOPING TECHNOLOGY, which in the view of the press is just as evil as making money, if for no other reason than someone makes money from the developed technology.

Think about it: You seldom see accolades afforded all the brilliant researchers at GE Medical Systems, Pfizer, Merck, Glaxo, Medtronic, or you name it, for precisely the same reason.

Fame is not needed to justify or validate the life and achievements of Norman Borlaug. But fame and respect are due to him nevertheless for the astonishing contribution he has made to the quality of life around the world.

Thank you, Dr. Borlaug. Billions go to bed without hunger thanks to you.

J.

The PowerNator Flexes...

Governor Schwarzenegger to research Revolutionary Radiation Free Fusion Reactor

In a move sure to impress environmentalists and further cement his Earth friendly image, Governor Schwarzenegger is set to launch a multimillion dollar research effort into a revolutionary new source of clean non-polluting power.

The reactor works by using Quasi-spherical magnetic fields that trap injected energetic electrons to form a spherical negative potential well. Fusion ions trapped in this spherical well focused through central region oscillate across the "core" until they are reacted.The project is focused on the Inertial Electrostatic Fusion reactor invented by the award winning American physicist Dr. Robert W. Bussard. The Radiation Free Fusion Reactor has the potential to change the whole landscape of energy generation, which is usually a choice between bad and worse options that include Nuclear, Coal and Natural Gas systems.

The State of California peak energy usage is about 40,000 Megawatts and is only expected to grow steadily over the coming years . Fusion opens a whole new avenue of cheap clean energy that could not only satisfy growing energy needs but also fuel massive water desalination plants that could help solve California’s acute water shortages.

And Google's looked at it - Ghu knows they've got the free cash to bankroll a project like this, and those server farms suck up a lot of electricity (and so do the cooling units for those farms...)

Wouldn't it be great if private enterprise managed in a few years what the government's been unable to do in five decades? Admittedly, the government's fusion efforts have been more of a jobs program than anything else... and they HAVE managed to eliminate a few approaches. Still, apparently this got dumped by the Navy when it started showing results.

If this works - I fully expect the environmentals to protest building of nuclear power plants of this type for SOME reason.

J.

The PowerNator Flexes...

Governor Schwarzenegger to research Revolutionary Radiation Free Fusion Reactor

In a move sure to impress environmentalists and further cement his Earth friendly image, Governor Schwarzenegger is set to launch a multimillion dollar research effort into a revolutionary new source of clean non-polluting power.

The reactor works by using Quasi-spherical magnetic fields that trap injected energetic electrons to form a spherical negative potential well. Fusion ions trapped in this spherical well focused through central region oscillate across the "core" until they are reacted.The project is focused on the Inertial Electrostatic Fusion reactor invented by the award winning American physicist Dr. Robert W. Bussard. The Radiation Free Fusion Reactor has the potential to change the whole landscape of energy generation, which is usually a choice between bad and worse options that include Nuclear, Coal and Natural Gas systems.

The State of California peak energy usage is about 40,000 Megawatts and is only expected to grow steadily over the coming years . Fusion opens a whole new avenue of cheap clean energy that could not only satisfy growing energy needs but also fuel massive water desalination plants that could help solve California’s acute water shortages.

And Google's looked at it - Ghu knows they've got the free cash to bankroll a project like this, and those server farms suck up a lot of electricity (and so do the cooling units for those farms...)

Wouldn't it be great if private enterprise managed in a few years what the government's been unable to do in five decades? Admittedly, the government's fusion efforts have been more of a jobs program than anything else... and they HAVE managed to eliminate a few approaches. Still, apparently this got dumped by the Navy when it started showing results.

If this works - I fully expect the environmentals to protest building of nuclear power plants of this type for SOME reason.

J.

July 25, 2007

Not a big surprise...

Captain's Quarters - Dry Runs

The Transportation Security Administration has issued a bulletin that confirms that an uptick in suspicious incidents indicate that a terrorist attack on airliners may be close at hand. The items seized by TSA include clay-like substances, potential IED components such as wires and switches, and cell-phone components that could be used as remote triggers

TSA speculation is that it's a desensitizing process to accustom screens to wierd stuff - or probing secondary airports to see where security is lax.

Considering how Al Q is getting trashed in Iraq, it's perhaps not surprising they're trying for a hit here in the US to maintain their reputation.

J.

Not a big surprise...

Captain's Quarters - Dry Runs

The Transportation Security Administration has issued a bulletin that confirms that an uptick in suspicious incidents indicate that a terrorist attack on airliners may be close at hand. The items seized by TSA include clay-like substances, potential IED components such as wires and switches, and cell-phone components that could be used as remote triggers

TSA speculation is that it's a desensitizing process to accustom screens to wierd stuff - or probing secondary airports to see where security is lax.

Considering how Al Q is getting trashed in Iraq, it's perhaps not surprising they're trying for a hit here in the US to maintain their reputation.

J.

Huge News: Egyptian Mufti Kills

Huge News: Egyptian Mufti Kills Death Penalty for Apostasy � Ali Eteraz

Huge News: Egyptian Mufti Kills

Huge News: Egyptian Mufti Kills Death Penalty for Apostasy � Ali Eteraz

If you've ever wondered..

when looking at your electricity meter just how many watts one turn of that aluminum disk measures, you can find the info at Wikipedia - Electricity meter

The amount of energy represented by one revolution of the disc is denoted by the symbol KWh which is given in units of watt-hours per revolution. The value 7.2 is commonly seen. Using the value of KWh, one can determine their power consumption at any given time by timing the disc with a stopwatch. If the time in seconds taken by the disc to complete one revolution is t, then the power in watts is P = 3600*KWh/t. For example, if KWh = 7.2, as above, and one revolution took place in 14.4 seconds, the power is 1800 watts. This method can be used to determine the power consumption of household devices by switching them on one by one.
With pretty much everything off except refrigerators, wall warts, one fan, the basement dehumidifier, and various other 'smart' appliances that use electricity while snoozing, it takes about 17 seconds for that disk to spin, indicating it's sucking about 1500 watts an hour.

Turn on the air conditioning, and it's going around in about 5 seconds, or about 5KW. Get both aircos on, and we're down to three, or 8 KW.

I think it's time to consider swapping out one of the systems. The external compressors came with the house - they're about 25 years old and likely not terribly efficient. Don't know if we could get by with just compressors, or whether we'd need to swap out everything...

So. What does YOUR abode draw when pretty much everything's shut down?

J.

If you've ever wondered..

when looking at your electricity meter just how many watts one turn of that aluminum disk measures, you can find the info at Wikipedia - Electricity meter

The amount of energy represented by one revolution of the disc is denoted by the symbol KWh which is given in units of watt-hours per revolution. The value 7.2 is commonly seen. Using the value of KWh, one can determine their power consumption at any given time by timing the disc with a stopwatch. If the time in seconds taken by the disc to complete one revolution is t, then the power in watts is P = 3600*KWh/t. For example, if KWh = 7.2, as above, and one revolution took place in 14.4 seconds, the power is 1800 watts. This method can be used to determine the power consumption of household devices by switching them on one by one.
With pretty much everything off except refrigerators, wall warts, one fan, the basement dehumidifier, and various other 'smart' appliances that use electricity while snoozing, it takes about 17 seconds for that disk to spin, indicating it's sucking about 1500 watts an hour.

Turn on the air conditioning, and it's going around in about 5 seconds, or about 5KW. Get both aircos on, and we're down to three, or 8 KW.

I think it's time to consider swapping out one of the systems. The external compressors came with the house - they're about 25 years old and likely not terribly efficient. Don't know if we could get by with just compressors, or whether we'd need to swap out everything...

So. What does YOUR abode draw when pretty much everything's shut down?

J.

Blazin'!

Speakeasy - Speed Test
Wow. I just did a speedtest, and am getting throughput of 9767 kbps download and 1858 kbps upload.

Dang, we've come a long way from the 300 baud modem!

J.

Blazin'!

Speakeasy - Speed Test
Wow. I just did a speedtest, and am getting throughput of 9767 kbps download and 1858 kbps upload.

Dang, we've come a long way from the 300 baud modem!

J.

I ain't sure about this...

Six Apart - Movable Type News - MT4: Time To Give It A Try

Right now I'm running 3.33 - and I'm pretty satisifed with the look and feel of the menus. I'm not sure I want to try 4.0 just yet... anyone else upgraded yet?

J.

I ain't sure about this...

Six Apart - Movable Type News - MT4: Time To Give It A Try

Right now I'm running 3.33 - and I'm pretty satisifed with the look and feel of the menus. I'm not sure I want to try 4.0 just yet... anyone else upgraded yet?

J.

Quick! Declare Defeat!

Don Surber � Blog Archive � Eyewitness: The Surge is working
Expect frothing by the Dems in the coming few weeks - because it looks like things just might... MIGHT be a bit more complex and a whole lot better than the factoids we get in the news.

J.

Quick! Declare Defeat!

Don Surber � Blog Archive � Eyewitness: The Surge is working
Expect frothing by the Dems in the coming few weeks - because it looks like things just might... MIGHT be a bit more complex and a whole lot better than the factoids we get in the news.

J.

July 26, 2007

Accident at Scaled Composites

Transterrestrial Musings has more details.

One of the comments hits the nail on the head - "Using electricity in your home used to mean installing knob & tube wiring. We still have some in ours. It's disconnected of course, the stuff was dangerous.

That doesn't mean we stopped using electricity - we just learned better ways to do it. The same will happen with hybrid engines."

We learn, we progress. We've come SO far, yet there's so much further to go to reach the stars. It won't come without cost - and the cost of progress is sometimes bloody indeed. But there will be plenty of people looking at this - and I'd bet there's not going to be any repeats if the hardware was at fault.

Human error? It's possible. Like the old joke says - when you make something idiot-proof, they breed a better idiot. The real problem is when the idiot kills others along with himself...

J.

Accident at Scaled Composites

Transterrestrial Musings has more details.

One of the comments hits the nail on the head - "Using electricity in your home used to mean installing knob & tube wiring. We still have some in ours. It's disconnected of course, the stuff was dangerous.

That doesn't mean we stopped using electricity - we just learned better ways to do it. The same will happen with hybrid engines."

We learn, we progress. We've come SO far, yet there's so much further to go to reach the stars. It won't come without cost - and the cost of progress is sometimes bloody indeed. But there will be plenty of people looking at this - and I'd bet there's not going to be any repeats if the hardware was at fault.

Human error? It's possible. Like the old joke says - when you make something idiot-proof, they breed a better idiot. The real problem is when the idiot kills others along with himself...

J.

July 27, 2007

As the saying goes...

If it bleeds, it leads. But what if it doesn't bleed?

Michael J. Totten: In the Wake of the Surge

“This is not what I expected in Baghdad,” I said.

“Most of what we’re doing doesn’t get reported in the media,” he said. “We’re not fighting a war here anymore, not in this area. We’ve moved way beyond that stage. We built a soccer field for the kids, bought all kinds of equipment, bought them school books and even chalk. Soon we’re installing 1,500 solar street lamps so they have light at night and can take some of the load off the power grid. The media only covers the gruesome stuff. We go to the sheiks and say hey man, what kind of projects do you want in this area? They give us a list and we submit the paperwork. When the projects get approved, we give them the money and help them buy stuff.”

Even if it's not covered by the media - it still exists. There's a LOT of progress in Iraq, and it doesn't go away because it's not bloody enough or sexy enough to cover. (Anyone else tired of the 'brainless media bimbo of the week' 24/7 obsessive coverage that seems to be the standard these days?) Five seconds of "A car bomb went off, killing 18 in a market place", and fifteen minutes of Brittany or Lindsey coverage every half hour sure give you a perspective on what's happening in Iraq!

J.

As the saying goes...

If it bleeds, it leads. But what if it doesn't bleed?

Michael J. Totten: In the Wake of the Surge

“This is not what I expected in Baghdad,” I said.

“Most of what we’re doing doesn’t get reported in the media,” he said. “We’re not fighting a war here anymore, not in this area. We’ve moved way beyond that stage. We built a soccer field for the kids, bought all kinds of equipment, bought them school books and even chalk. Soon we’re installing 1,500 solar street lamps so they have light at night and can take some of the load off the power grid. The media only covers the gruesome stuff. We go to the sheiks and say hey man, what kind of projects do you want in this area? They give us a list and we submit the paperwork. When the projects get approved, we give them the money and help them buy stuff.”

Even if it's not covered by the media - it still exists. There's a LOT of progress in Iraq, and it doesn't go away because it's not bloody enough or sexy enough to cover. (Anyone else tired of the 'brainless media bimbo of the week' 24/7 obsessive coverage that seems to be the standard these days?) Five seconds of "A car bomb went off, killing 18 in a market place", and fifteen minutes of Brittany or Lindsey coverage every half hour sure give you a perspective on what's happening in Iraq!

J.

Gonna be out for a bit... - Updated

About a week or so.

It's an open thread! Play nice!

(Or not. You choose, and take the consequences...)

Update: Will be letting you know what's going on in the comments - the campsite is Anvil Campground in Williamsburg... and we couldn't quite tell it was right next to a rail line. Google Earth didn't QUITE go down to the needed resolution..

J.

Gonna be out for a bit... - Updated

About a week or so.

It's an open thread! Play nice!

(Or not. You choose, and take the consequences...)

Update: Will be letting you know what's going on in the comments - the campsite is Anvil Campground in Williamsburg... and we couldn't quite tell it was right next to a rail line. Google Earth didn't QUITE go down to the needed resolution..

J.

About July 2007

This page contains all entries posted to Rusted Sky in July 2007. They are listed from oldest to newest.

June 2007 is the previous archive.

August 2007 is the next archive.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.36