In the wake of the revalations of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's confessions, I wonder what those poor saps at U of WF are thinking? Or are they just going to write it all off as a fantasy, as coerced confessions, or a fabrication by the US Government? I mean, they KNOW the government was really behind 9/11, so why is this guy claiming credit for the planning?
I do know this much - when I asked for a source for their thinking, I never got anything solid back. When I posted links to sites with debunking info on 9/11 conspiracies, asking for something as solid in return, I received no reply. Nothing in the spamtrap, nothing held for moderation, no comments back on that subject at all. Do you think they followed the links, read them, and were embarrased at their gullibility? Hell, I know I'd be.
You know, that's no way to convince someone of the rightness of your position. If you disagree with something I say, I'd really like to have a link or other information about WHY you believe the way you do. I'm always open to learning new things - but if you've got a disagreement you need to have your info lined up to get me to change my mind, and those poor saps just didn't have it.
J.