« The Fair Tax going again? | Main | Laying it on thick, and early... »

Beautiful People - made ugly.

My parents are using my house as their mailing address. As such - I'm getting my mother's magazines and my father's junk mail. I've already received permission from him to dump the get-rich-quick offers, which comprise most of it. That leaves my mother's magazine - the Enquirer, the Star, and one other the name of which mercifully escapes me at this point.

I'm rather agast at these things. Sure, they're a celebration of pop culture - but the culture they celebrate is that of the media star - of the Paris Hiltons and Brittany Spears of the world, caught in all their misbehaving 'glory'. A little of it goes a hell of a long way.

What is there about paparazzi and magazines like the Enquirer that seem to go for the cheapest shots and try to persuade us that the things they cover are really IMPORTANT, that this stuff matters? Who show bulges on midriffs, who'll gladly take photos of stars sans makeup and hair stylist attention and gleefully print them? What's the impulse that makes them do that - and why do folks find it so (apparently) interesting?

And HOW do all the male stars/objects of transitory interest seem to be sporting about a 4-day stubble? Is there a particular razor that'll give you a guaranteed seedy look?

Sigh.

It seems to me that they're debasing the coin they try to spend. What is an actor or actress or singer got but their talent? And these tabloids... when they get into the sleaze they're not looking at the talent. But then, the subjects of the pictures and articles aren't exactly worried about how they'll come across to their fans - they figure the job's locked in, so why be concerned?

Maybe the tabloids are just trying to show their subjects are simply people also? That they smoke, drink, do stupid things? (Never mind the characters they project on screen or stage - THAT'S simply an act, one they get paid well for.) So... Well, yeah - they're human. And it's all about the sales, isn't it? Get the eyeballs, get them to buy it at the checkout counter...

And the world gets a little uglier, when X's wrinkles or Y's stretch marks are plastered up in three-color glory or the details of V and B's split are hyped like crazy. Someone will buy it - so why not go ahead and publish it, right?

J.

Comments (1)

My mom's junk mail was charities. She gave to a few religious and medical charities and was rewarded by being bombarded for more requests for money than I've ever seen, little monasteries and big churches, obscure diseases and big organizations, and then charities overseas that had piggybacked on the other two. I found THAT pretty appalling.

Mom got the ENQUIRER for years and my godmother next door would get the STAR and then they would swap. Mom bought the ENQUIRER from the 1970s (I once got a minor prize in their Spot-the-Blooper contest for spotting a boner in an episode of ELLERY QUEEN). They've always had this celebrity nonsense, but it was much milder then and they had other things then: silly stuff like the search for Bigfoot, but also articles about new scientific and health discoveries, true animal stories, government boondoggle articles, people helping people, etc. Mom used to read it for the medical news, and many times the ENQUIRER used to announce some new health discovery that the "regular" newspapers didn't pick up for months.

Now it's pretty much just tabloid stuff. Like...boring...

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 19, 2007 9:37 PM.

The previous post in this blog was The Fair Tax going again?.

The next post in this blog is Laying it on thick, and early....

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.36