Want to search for dust grains?
Stardust@Home - About Finding StardustCool tech. I love stuff like this.On January 15, 2006, the Stardust spacecraft's sample return capsule parachuted gently onto the Utah desert. Nestled within the capsule were precious particles collected during Stardust’s dramatic encounter with comet Wild 2 in January of 2004 and something else, even rarer and no less precious: tiny particles of interstellar dust that originate in distant stars, light-years away. They are the first such pristine particles ever collected in space, and scientists are eagerly waiting for their chance to "get their hands" on them.
Before they can be studied, though, these tiny interstellar grains will have to be found. This will not be easy. Unlike the thousand of particles of varying sizes collected from the comet, scientists estimate that Stardust collected only around 45 interstellar dust particles. They are tiny—only about a micron (a millionth of a meter) in size! These miniscule particles are embedded in an aerogel collector 1,000 square centimeters in size. To make things worse the collector plates are interspersed with flaws, cracks, and an uneven surface. All this makes the interstellar dust particles extremely difficult to locate.
If we were doing this project twenty years ago, we would have searched for the tracks through a high-magnification microscope. Because the view of the microscope is so small, we would have to move the microscope more than 1.6 million times to search the whole collector. In each field of view, you would focus up and down by hand to look for the tracks. This is so much work, that even starting twenty years ago, we would still be doing it today!
This is where you come in:
J.
Comments (2)
Jerry:
What would you name a particle if you discovered one?
I'd probably go with Tinkerbell.
Do you believe?
otpu
Posted by otpu | August 3, 2006 5:04 PM
Posted on August 3, 2006 17:04
It would depend how large the particle was. I'm thinking, if it's micron size or smaller calling it "Everest". A bit larger, K2. And so on in a reverse scale. The size of a grain of sand would be Stone Mountain...
J.
Posted by JLawson | August 3, 2006 10:49 PM
Posted on August 3, 2006 22:49