« April 2006 | Main | June 2006 »

May 2006 Archives

May 1, 2006

WTF?

Why didn't THIS get any notice?

Teheran raids Iraq in attack on Kurds

Teheran has attacked an anti-Iranian Kurdish group based in Iraq, it emerged yesterday, raising fears that instability there could spill over into the rest of the region.

Iraq's defence ministry said more than 180 artillery shells were fired and Iranian troops crossed three miles into Iraqi territory before withdrawing.

The incursion, which occurred on April 21, came after Iranian claims that a number of attacks had been conducted against Iranian army and Revolutionary Guard posts in recent weeks.

They are accused of operating from bases around Haj Oman, which was the centre of the Iranian attack. Four people were said to have been wounded.

The group, known as the Pejak, is fighting for the creation of a ''Greater Kurdistan'' linking predominantly Kurd- populated areas in Iraq, Syria, Turkey and Iran.

You know, I'm really getting the feeling that I'm not hearing anywhere NEAR the whole story any more...

J.

Ethanol as a solution?

Ethanol: A Tragedy in 3 Acts

Um. If you think a 25-30% drop in fuel economy when running on an ethanol-gas blend is a good thing, as well as selling it for more than gasoline...

Also, corn doesn't seem to be an efficient feedstock for ethanol production, overall taking about as much energy to make a gallon of ethanol as you'd get from burning it. Apparently sugar cane's a lot better - but unless you're looking to annex Cuba or plow Florida under and put in fields of sugar cane (which, from reading elsewhere, is REALLY fought by the sugar lobby to keep the price of sugar UP) (Didn't know there was a sugar lobby? Neither did I...) it's just not going to be cost/energy effective...

J.

Test

Test

THESE are what they consider... MUST-SEE?

Let's look them over.

15 Must-See Summer Movies - Newsweek Entertainment - MSNBC.com

1. Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl - Yes
2. The Da Vinci Code - Eh. Maybe. Didn't find the book interesting enough to finish it.
3. Superman Returns - Quite likely.
4. Little Miss Sunshine - Nope.
5. An Inconvenient Truth - No.
6. Talladega Nights - Unlikely.
7. Brothers of the Head - Don't think so.
8. The Devil Wears Prada - Um, no. Next?
9. Nacho Libre - Eh, maybe when Netflix gets it. If I remember.
10. Mission: Impossible III - $396 million? Must see? Don't think so.
11. Miami Vice - Retread. What's next? A movie version of St. Elsewhere?
12. The Science of Sleep - Actually sounds good - quite possible.
13. The Break-Up - Retread. No. How about some FRESH actors, eh?
14. Monster House - Maybe.
15. Click - A magical remote that lets you fast forward through life. Don't think so.

Guess I'm getting picky - good luck to the folks who are putting out these 'Must See' movies. Maybe they'll resonate better with other folks, but it's pretty bad when only 4 out of 15 have any sort of appeal. At least to me - your mileage may vary.

J.

Changes...

Rusted Sky

I’m going to be trying a changeover here - from Milblog.org to RustedSky.Net. And I’ll be changing from MT to WordPress. We’ll see how it goes… (And please note, the RustedSky.net link's not live yet...) You can preview things at Rustedsky.milblog.org.

Then again, if I can simply rename my MT setup... Well, we'll see. Gotta admit, WordPress went in a lot easier than any MT install I've done...

J.

May 2, 2006

Lost my vote...

newsobserver.com | Evan Bayh: Making a stand on stewardship

Q: Why do you think we should abolish the Electoral College?

A: "I think our president should be chosen by the majority of the American people. That is ordinarily the case. But in 2000, as we all recall, we elected this president with fewer votes than the other candidate got. I just don't think in the modern era that is appropriate."

Let the coasts decide, and screw the flyover states that don't have enough people. I don't care what his other policies are, he's not getting my vote just for that.

J.

Getting iffy...

BBC NEWS | Middle East | Iran hits out at 'dangerous' US

Iran has strongly criticised the US at the United Nations, accusing Washington of threatening to launch a military strike against its nuclear facilities.

In a letter delivered to Secretary General Kofi Annan, Iran said the US was "openly" planning to attack Iran in breach of international law.

Why would that be? Well...
BBC NEWS | World | Middle East | Iran nuclear plan 'irreversible'

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has again vowed never to give up Iran's nuclear programme.

Mr Ahmadinejad said the pursuit of peaceful nuclear technology was Iran's "absolute right... our red line".

He was speaking after the UN's atomic watchdog said Iran had failed to meet a Security Council deadline to suspend its uranium enrichment programme.

Oh, by the way...
A top US diplomat has said he expects European states to prepare a binding UN resolution on Iran's nuclear programme that could allow for sanctions.
US Under Secretary of State Nicholas Burns was speaking ahead of Paris talks between all five permanent members of the UN Security Council on the issue.

But he insisted that diplomatic efforts to resolve the crisis were not over.

Right.
a title="BBC NEWS | World | Middle East | Iran says UN sanctions unlikely" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4963802.stm">BBC NEWS | World | Middle East | Iran says UN sanctions unlikely

Iran has predicted Russia and China will block any move to impose sanctions over its nuclear programme.

Foreign Minister Manuchehr Mottaki said in Tehran that the two veto-wielding states had told Iran they were "against sanctions and military attacks".

Top diplomats from all five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, as well as Germany, are in Paris for talks on the issue.

The diplomats are dancing on the edge of the abyss. How long until disaster hits?

BTW, I really don't think Ahmadinejad understands that 'irreversable' doesn't mean what he thinks. When it comes to their nuclear facilities - all their work is reversable. Blow it into tiny pieces, and that'll 'reverse' things for a while.

J.

Shutting comments down temporarily...

Trying to do an export and import...

I gave up temporarily on WordPress - figured it'd be best to stay with the devil I knew re configuration and coding. So, please be patient...

J.

Well, rats.

That ddn't work ANYWHERE near the way I expected it to.

Hold on - let me reload. AGAIN.

(Mutter-mutter... now where did I leave that darn duct tape?)

J.

Quick check...

Dr. Sanity's on a roll today. Go and take a look - lots of good posts.

Me, I can't hardly keep my eyes open. I'm off to bed...

J.

May 3, 2006

Well, where the heck did THAT come from?

Didn't see THAT on the preview...

Okay, back to the drawing board...

J.

There was one thing the article didn't explain...

Half-ton man seeks life-saving surgery
Who keeps feeding him? No wife, no apparent job

The calories needed to maintain that bulk had to come from somewhere.

I'm not entirely unsympathetic with his plight - but it took some diligent eating to get to that condition.

J.

Hmmm....

Greenspirit - Home page of Patrick Moore

That's interesting - one of the founders of Greenpeace speaking out against activist excesses...

J.

Haven't posted much on this...

Frankly, there were a lot of folks saying it better than I could. Anyway, this is rather predictable.

After Protests, Backlash Grows

While a series of marches focused much of the nation's attention on the plight of illegal immigrants, scores of other Americans quietly seethed. Now, with the same full-throated cry expressed by those in the country illegally, they are shouting back.

Congressional leaders in Washington have gotten bricks in the mail from a group that advocates building a border fence, states in the West and South have drawn up tough anti-immigrant laws, and ordinary citizens, such as Janis McDonald of Pennsylvania, who considers herself a liberal, are not mincing words in expressing their displeasure.

I'll be blunt. Illegal aliens need to either keep their heads down to avoide hassles from the ICE - or they need to go home. Demanding - DEMANDING - rights, when they broke the law getting here in the first place, doesn't impress me one bit.
"Send them back," McDonald said. "Build a damn wall and be done with it."
I've worked for immigrants. I've worked with immigrants. When one of my co-workers from Africa's Ivory Coast got naturalized, I congratulated him.

I've got no problems with folks who want to immigrate, who want to follow the law. Apply, come over, learn English, learn the history, go through the procedures... and become a citizen. Glad to have you, welcome to the dream.

This... DEMANDING legalization, while carrying Mexican flags, while promoting the Aztlan movement, while threatening to take back the Southwest if not allowed citizenship - that just doesn't cut it.

Well, I think ANSWER was looking to provoke a backlash. They may well get it - but not quite what they expect.

J.

May 4, 2006

Still trying to get things set up right -

I'm trying to get rid of that little white bar on either side of the title above. Very aggravating...

If you're good with CSS code, the stuff's in the extended entry for your perusal. Any suggestions/advice would be GREATLY appreciated!

J.

Continue reading "Still trying to get things set up right -" »

And so, another phase ends.

Or maybe a sideshow, it's hard to tell.

Moussaoui defiant at sentencing - U.S. Security - MSNBC.com

ALEXANDRIA, Va. - U.S. Judge Leonie Brinkema sent Zacarias Moussaoui to prison for life Thursday, to “die with a whimper,” for his role in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

...

Brinkema firmly refused to be interrupted by the 37-year-old defendant as she disputed his claim that his life sentence meant America had lost and he had won.

“Mr. Moussaoui, when this proceeding is over, everyone else in this room will leave to see the sun ... hear the birds ... and they can associate with whomever they want,” she said.

‘Absolutely clear who won’
She went on: “You will spend the rest of your life in a supermax prison. It’s absolutely clear who won.”

And she said it was proper he will be kept away from outsiders, unable to speak publicly again.

“Mr. Moussaoui, you came here to be a martyr in a great big bang of glory,” she said, “but to paraphrase the poet T.S. Eliot, instead you will die with a whimper.”

Seems just to me. Apparently he's going to be in solitary - allowed out for an hour a day.

I think a lot of his outbursts in court were designed to get a death penalty verdict. And though there's the possibility that he's 'crazy like a fox' and used those outbursts to manipulate the jury into giving him life in prison instead of death - seeing as the whole psychology of the jihadist is formed around the idea of martrydom - you've got to wonder whether for all his bravado and bluster he actually was hoping for the notoriety of a death sentance, knowing it would likely be a good five or ten years before it could be carried out.

As it is - like the judge said, he's going to die essentially forgotten. No quick, glorious martyrdom, just a 7x12 foot room and solitary confinement for the rest of his life.

Would it be mean of me to suggest his menu include hearty breakfasts of bacon and eggs (cooked in bacon grease), nourishing lunches of fried (in bacon grease) ham and cheese sandwiches, and luxurious dinners of cranberry roast pork?

Probably - but you know something? I just don't care.

J.

May 5, 2006

DDT making a comeback?

FOXNews.com - DDT: A Weapon of Mass Survival

The U.S. Government has finally begun to reverse policy on the insecticide DDT. Let’s hope that this policy shift represents the beginning of the end of what can only be called a crime against humanity: the decades-old withholding of the world’s most effective anti-malarial weapon from billions of adults and children at risk of dying from the disease.

The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) told the Washington Times this week (May 3) that it endorses and will fund the indoor spraying of DDT in sub-Saharan Africa. Malaria kills more than one million Africans annually, mostly children under five and pregnant women.

Malaria accounts for 10 percent of Africa’s disease burden and causes $12 billion yearly in lost productivity.

USAID reportedly will use about 20 percent of its $99 billion budget to fund indoor spraying with DDT, according to the Times. “Between 1 million and 1.5 million people will be protected,” a USAID official told the Times.

So... let's see, 20% of 99 billion is (rounding for a bit easier calculation... $20 billion. To protect 1.5 million people... That can't be right - $13,333 each?

Yeesh.

I think using DDT for malarial control is an idea that's long past time. But $13k per person to do this? And that would seem to be an ANNUAL expense?

Why not just give them tickets to the US and a $10k stipend while they learn how to be citizens? That would kill two birds with one stone - it'd get them out of the malarial regions, and cut costs.

$13k. Hey, I've got mosquitos in my back yard - can I get some of that?

J.

We have a Myth-el gap...

TCS Daily - Why Isn't Socialism Dead?

An interesting look at how, despite the fact that Socialism/Communism seems to drag everyone down to the same level of misery over time, people keep thinking that THIS time whoever's proposing it will get it right...

Despite the proven body count when they get it wrong, the attraction never seems to fade.

J.

Hard to tell the complete story in 10 seconds...

But then, that's about all the time it seems is allowed these days to cover any story - so you go for the most sensational sound bite you can come up with. And frankly, it doesn't do much good for the public discourse when the news sources don't do a complete job of reporting the news - both bad and good.

Let's face it - reporting in a war zone's damn dangerous and expensive. It's VERY hard to do a good job, or even an adequate one - but it's one of the most important things to do in a conflict of this magnitude which will likely stretch on another couple of decades.

Serving the People of Iraq and Iran: Declaring War on the Sound Bite Insurgency

Our sound-bite society believes anything it sees or hears in short-length bursts. Some Americans are so sure that ‘sound-bite equals reality’ that when confronted with the much-more detailed truth they are not sure how to react. Maybe they get it from the French. Nothing illustrates more clearly the strategic success of the Sound Bite Insurgency than what does not get reported about Operation Iraqi Freedom.

A couple of days ago, on the third anniversary of President Bush’s appearance on the USS Abraham Lincoln declaring the end of major combat operations in Iraq, sound bites galore were spewed to the four winds, accusing the president of all manner of lies, deceptions, and failures on that occasion and in the interval since then. The trouble is that often sound bites are inimical to the truth, especially when they come from the Sound Bite Insurgency (SBI).

I wouldn't necessarily call them an 'insurgency' - they're acting in accord with the prime reason for them to be in business. They need money to keep the lights on and the transmitters going, not to mention paying overinflated salaries to their 'news anchors'. (Hmm. I never thought about the connotation of the word 'anchor' as it pertains to the 'news'.)

You get money by selling advertising time to sponsors. In order to charge big bucks for that time, you've got to have good ratings. In order to get good ratings, you need a consistent viewership. In order to get consistent viewers, you have to either give them what they want (see the Michael Jackson trial) or what they'll tune in to watch on a consistent basis (which is usually bad news). Good news doesn't sell well. Bad news does. Blood sells. It's all about the Benjamins.

So they make the bucks, while putting out a shoddy product. Well, what a surprise there.

Oh, by the way - he's got opinions on Halliburton, too.

Serving the People of Iraq and Iran: Halliburton, Halliburton!

Summary: A lot of people in the media and in the Democratic Party have insinuated that one of the main reasons that we are in Iraq is because Dick Cheney profits from Halliburton, and Halliburton wants to make a lot of money. I want to give you my perspective on what Halliburton is contributing to Operation Iraqi Freedom.

There are very few companies that could take on the logistical responsibilities that Halliburton takes on. Providing all of the services that Halliburton does for approximately 150,000 soldiers all over the country is remarkable. Never once have I been without a hot cooked meal. I have always been able to take a shower when I wanted to—almost always with warm water. Every barracks that I have stayed in has been cooled by air conditioning. I can lift weights whenever I am not on duty or on some kind of mission.

Halliburton employees are doing a lot of things that it would cost a lot more to do if soldiers were involved. Its subsidiary, Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR) coordinates all of the logistics on the bases that I have been on, from showers, toilets and garbage, to movies, ping pong tournaments, and weightlifting, to food, ice, water, and Gatorade. KBR employs further subsidiary companies from Africa and Eastern Europe to take care of sanitation—such as ensuring that toilets and showers are clean, and that garbage is transported to the dump and burned. Barbers cut my hair. Cashiers provide most of what I need at the Post Exchange. People at the embroidery shop sew insignia on my caps and repair tears in my uniforms. I have met very courteous Halliburton employees from India, Sri Lanka, Turkey, Bangladesh, Sudan, Hungary, and many more—not to mention Iraq.

Not to mention.

All snarky comments aside, very few people have any idea just what a logistical effort it is and how much material it takes to even FEED 150,000+ people four meals a day, much less do anything else that Halliburton does.

Back in the late 80s, early 90s the trend was to outsource the divisions of the military that were concerned with troop support - because civilians could do it cheaper and better. One of the main reasons we needed so many people in WW2 was that we had to carry a complete infrastructure along to supply the front lines - look up the "Red Ball Express". It was necessary to have mobile field kitchens, mobile bakeries, mobile laundries and shower units - all manned by soldiers, all needing to be fed, all needing transport. It was a hellacious logistical challenge, but one that was necessary because there wasn't any other way to do it.

Now there is - and it costs less that having the military do it.

If you're not impressed, it's because you don't realize the magnitude of the challenge, and how it was overcome - and it's pretty amazing to me that we've got companies in existance that can do what it took hundreds of thousands of men in the 40's. Sure - you can rail against them all you want, but the hard truth is that if the military had to do it all, it'd cost a LOT more, and the quality wouldn't be good at all. So bitch about Halliburton if you will - but they're doing a hell of a good job.

J.

The Kennedy Curse strikes again.

This morning on the way to work, the story I heard was that he had an accident. A little while after that, he'd had an accident - then higher-ups showed and took him home, but he didn't have a breathalyzer test, despite the fact that he'd been weaving as he walked and had (at least according to one source) smelled of alcohol. At lunch, the narrative was that he'd mixed phenergan and Ambien. Well, I'll tell you - the few times I've had phenergan for nausea the last thing I wanted to do was go for a drive... but apparently Ambien can cause sleepwalking...

Now this?

Rep. Kennedy to enter rehab - Politics - MSNBC.com

WASHINGTON - Rep. Patrick Kennedy said Friday he was entering treatment for addiction to prescription pain medication, a decision made after a highly publicized car crash near the Capitol that the congressman said he cannot recall.

Kennedy, D-R.I., said he would seek immediate treatment at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn.

He announced his decision to reporters at a Capitol Hill news conference. He walked in alone, gripped the lectern, cleared his throat and began haltingly.

Apparently he's had some other trifling problems.
Kennedy, who has struggled with addiction and depression, said he had checked into the Mayo Clinic over the Christmas holidays and returned to Congress “reinvigorated and healthy.”

“Of course, in every recovery, each day has its ups and downs, but I have been strong, focused and productive since my return,” Kennedy said.

'Not how I want to live my life'
The congressman said he again became concerned about his condition after the Thursday morning car accident.

“I simply do not remember getting out of bed, being pulled over by the police, or being cited for three driving infractions,” Kennedy said. “That’s not how I want to live my life. And that’s not how I want to represent the people of Rhode Island.”

As he was leaving the room, Kennedy was asked whether he might resign, and he shook his head no. “I need to stay in the fight,” he said. He did not take other questions.

You might need to stay in the fight, Rep. Kennedy - but the question should be whether Rhode Island needs someone with your... difficulties... to represent them.

And here's a question for you political junkies out there. Apparently it's okay for a Democrat to have an addiction to painkillers and bouts of depression and keep his position. If he were a Republican with the same problems - would you be thinking he should stay?

Frankly, I'm abivalent about whether he should stay or go. He's got problems, but they're nothing that others haven't overcome. He could rise above them - or succumb to the Kennedy Curse of too much money and no responsibility or accountability.

It seems like the Capitol police have decided to 'help' him on the responsibility/accountability thing. Being a Kennedy's pretty damn tough. It's good to have friends in high places...

J.

Go ahead. You know you want to...

Beat up your PC - use your fists to smash your computer to pieces

In this stress reliever game use YOUR MOUSE to click the parts of computer on your desk. You can beat your PC until you smash it to peieces. Have fun guys!

May 6, 2006

Every so often I see something...

AndI just don't quite know what to make of it. Consider this article...

Confident Democrats Lay Out Agenda

Democratic leaders, increasingly confident they will seize control of the House in November, are laying plans for a legislative blitz during their first week in power that would raise the minimum wage, roll back parts of the Republican prescription drug law, implement homeland security measures and reinstate lapsed budget deficit controls.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) said in an interview last week that a Democratic House would launch a series of investigations of the Bush administration, beginning with the White House's first-term energy task force and probably including the use of intelligence in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. Pelosi denied Republican allegations that a Democratic House would move quickly to impeach President Bush. But, she said of the planned investigations, "You never know where it leads to."

In recent days, Democratic confidence has been buoyed by a series of polls indicating that not only is Bush growing increasingly unpopular, so are Republicans in Congress. An Associated Press-Ipsos poll released Friday found that 33 percent of the public approves of Bush's job performance, the lowest rating of his presidency. And only 25 percent approves of the job Congress is doing, a figure comparable to congressional approval ratings before the 1994 elections that swept Republicans to power.

The AP-Ipsos poll found that 51 percent of Americans say they want Democrats rather than Republicans to control Congress. Only 34 percent favor Republican control.

"We have to be ready to win," Pelosi said, "and we have to tell [voters] what we will do when we win."

And I've got to admit I'm kind of appalled at the immediate plans by the Democrats to launch investigations which supposedly aren't going to be used to impeach Bush - but 'you never know where they're going to lead.'.

Your mileage may vary on this - but I'm thinking their immediate, primary need is to discredit Bush as quickly as possible.

I've NEVER, in watching the political scene for the last 30 years, seen such a self-centered, self-obsessed pack of cretins as the current Democratic party... short of, perhaps, the Perotistas in '92 and '96. Their priorities aren't aimed at doing what's good for the country, or winning the WoT, or making sure our borders are secure, or handling the energy crisis - it's to gain power and wreak revenge on their personal and political enemies - and if it doesn't do anything good for the country that's just too damn bad.

I'd expect that sort of childish, revenge-seeking crap from grade schoolers, or maybe high-school cliques. But these are grownups, supposedly responsible enough to run the country. What they're putitng up as a 'plan' if they get into control would be amusing in a blackly comic way in a movie. But after two hours in a theater, you come out and get back to real life. And you can go "Damn, that was entertaining, but I'm glad real life isn't like that."

The Dems have fought Bush tooth and nail to avoid any energy reform. They've fought drilling in ANWR and anywhere else in the US territorial waters. They've fought him tooth and nail on homeland security, and the running of the WoT. Social Security's in trouble, and they've been VERY proud of their ability to keep ANY substantial reform from even being considered.

It wasn't too long ago they were floating the idea of registering illegal aliens to vote. Here in Georgia, they've been fighting hard the idea of requiring voter ID.

And I'm supposed to trust them? To believe they have a better idea? I've SEEN Democratic 'better ideas' - it's called promise everything you can to get elected, and then do jack shit about the stuff you promised. When the next elections come around, promise everything you can to get re-elected, and blame everything that DIDN'T happen after the previous election on either the other party or unforseen occurances in the economy, or unforseen complications on the national or world situation. And for Finagle's sake, NEVER let Republicans propose or implement anything, because someone might get the idea that Republicans aren't the bad guys.

What the hell. I lived through the sucky 70s. Maybe we need another Democratic President and a Democratic administration to remind us how they can almost completely FUBAR the economy. But I'm afraid that we cannot afford a President, House, and Senate that's not willing to respond with strength to an attack, which is what would come along with that. And we could well and truely screw up the Middle East if we were to go into isolationist mode and withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan.

Let's not even discuss what would happen to gas prices if we did so.

Crap. I really wish the Democratic party would find some damn adults to put in charge instead of the overgrown teen-agers that seem to be at the helm. Maybe this isn't really the way the whole Democratic party is headed, maybe Pelosi is just tossing out trial balloons to see what floats. But overall? As far as I'm concerned this is a lead balloon, and if the Democratic party tries to float with it I'm not seeing they're going to get much traction aside from their committed base. Legislative foolishness is one thing - malignant stupidity is something else again.

Like the old saying goes - you should always vote. You might not have anyone or anything you want to vote FOR, but there's almost certainly going to be someone you'll want to vote AGAINST. And stuff like this makes it a LOT harder for me to consider voting for a Democrat. If they want me to believe they take the problems facing the country seriously - this isn't a way to gain my confidence on that matter. And if this is meant to inspire my trust in their ethical sensibilities and stability - they can pretty well kiss that trust goodbye.

J.

May 7, 2006

From the mouths of Aliens...

The MoxArgon Group is an amiable group of Intergalactic Overlords. They seem to have a lot of the answers we earthlings are lacking...

The MoxArgon Group: Time To Open MoxArgon's Mail-Sac! -

XRAN This e-mail comes from Markos Moonbatsis. Markos writes:

Isn't it so f**king cool that the retired Generals and CIA folks are putting the screws to those crypto-fascists Rumsfeld and Chimpybushitler?

MOXARGON Sure, if you want your precious democracy destroyed. Ask yourself these three questions:

1. If a cadre of senior military officers and intelligence operatives started leaking classified information and subverting national security, during wartime, to deliberately undermine a sitting Democratic president and boost his Republican opponents wouldn't you be screaming about "coups" and "vast right-wing conspiracies?"

2. Wouldn't the media be portraying these men and women as sinister figures trying to seize power in Washington instead of calling them heroic whistleblowers and giving each other prizes for endangering American lives?

3. Why does having a Republican president make a covert military/intelligence coup more palatable to you?

Think about it.

Oh, I have.

And the best conclusion I've come up with is that a lot of the people on the left who are praising this sort of thing don't understand that we're not looking at a game called "Who Gets To Control The United States Government" that's loosely styled on "The Weakest Link". Instead, we're in one large game of "Risk" - and a whole lot of more repsonsible people are trying hard to get an adequate position for the US while being undercut badly by some groups at home.

Playing games with politics is usually inconsequential. In fact, it can even be a source of sour amusement, of black comedy, as you watch and correlate actions taken (or not taken) with results (or not) five, ten, fifteen years down the road. Playing political games, scorekeeping with elections - it can be a relatively harmless pasttime, and in the past it didn't make much of a difference.

Now - we don't have the luxury of playing that game. Yet the Democrats don't seem to get it.

What's inconsequential and a source of amusement when the stakes are low can be a damn disaster when the stakes are high. And right now, I'm convinced we're looking at the highest stakes - at the survival of western Civilization.

Bush is not the cause of the problem. There's a lot of (by our standards) non-rational actors out there, and the various actors and plot lines intertwine like a Tom Clancy novel cubed. The end result is the same, however - everyone's angling for what THEY think is best for them - and a whole lot of them don't give a good goddamn if they burn down the rest of the world to get what they believe they want..

Sound silly? Sure is. It's easy to make fun of that idea. And when faced with an enemy who has a penchant for torturing women before killing them it'd be really nice to be able to believe that somehow, someone you despise is the cause of it. Becuase you DON'T want to believe that there can be people so vile, so cruel, so depraved...

And these are the people the likes of Michael Moore revere. Perhaps that says more about Moore and the causes he supports than you want to consider.

J.

May 8, 2006

Now THIS is an interesting idea...

Buy gas at a specific price per gallon, and sock it away until you need it.

First Fuel Banks

The idea of a fully automated fueling site began in the mind of Denis Feneis. His sons, Jim and Dan Feneis, expanded this idea into a prepay, automated gas bank, with features that would allow consumers to prepay their fuel expense and lock into a set price.

All this was only a dream until computer technology made this concept feasible. In April of 1982 Jim and Dan made this dream a reality when they built the innovative system of First Fuel Banks I at 625 SE Lincoln Avenue in St. Cloud, MN. This was the first fueling site of its kind in the world. Many others have tried to imitate, but none have been comparable.

They ever get into the Atlanta area, they'll make a fortune.

J.

Yeah, that's robust' all right...

TaxProf Blog: CBO Reports Tax Revenue Gusher in 2006

The Congressional Budget Office reports "robust" growth in tax revenues for the first four months of 2006:

10% increase in personal tax revenues, 29.5% in Corporate.

Obviously, the thing to do is tax it more. I suggest an immediate 30% tax increase on corporate profits, and 10% on all personal income.

We can stymie this booming economy! All it takes is a bit more sacrifice on all our parts, and we'll get a recession, possibly even a depression!

Seriously - for an economy that's supposedly a sucking wound on the chest of the body politic, it's pretty odd that tax revenues are rising the way they are. Especially the personal tax revenues... and also consider we've got an unemployment rate of 4.7% - that's much better than it's been for most of my life. You might argue that the jobs aren't any good - but you don't get a 10% increase of personal tax revenues from burger flipper jobs.

I'd like to see Bush make his tax cuts permanent. Let's see if we can keep the growth going.

J.

A bit late...

Moussaoui Fails in Bid to Withdraw 9/11 Guilty Plea

Facing transfer to the nation's toughest federal prison, Zacarias Moussaoui served up what may be his final legal surprise yesterday: The al-Qaeda conspirator said he was not involved in the Sept. 11, 2001, terror plot after all and wants a new trial to prove it.

Ah, yeah. Sure. You confess, eloquently, consistenly, and repeatedly - and tried your damndest to get the jury angry enough to get the death penalty. You "Won", remember? Against the US legal system? You didn't get the death penalty.

Instead, you got sentenced to live the rest of your life in a solitary Supermax cell. No chance of parole, no death row notoriety and no 72 virgins as a martyred jihadi... and all of a sudden - you didn't do it?

No, you poor sap, you're not getting another trial - you can't withdraw a guilty plea after the trial's over. You're going to be in jail for the rest of your life - seeing nobody but the guards who'll haul you out of your cell once a day for exercise. In five years you'll be a fading memory. In ten, forgotten. In thirty? Buried in a prison graveyard - unmourned and unremembered.

You won, man. You said you were guilty. If you weren't, you sure as hell played your part to the hilt. You convinced the jury you were guilty as hell.

You won against the American legal system. Now you've got to live with it. In a 7x12 cell.

Alone.

J.

In other news...

BREITBART.COM - Newspaper Circulation Declines 2.6 Percent

Newspaper circulation fell 2.6 percent in the six-month period ending in March, according to data released Monday, as more people turned to the Internet and other media outlets for news and information.

The decline in average paid weekday circulation was about the same as the previous six-month reporting cycle for the period ending last September, according to the Newspaper Association of America, a trade group.

It's almost like folks don't trust the papers any more...

J.

May 9, 2006

Couple of things for you to check out...

RealClearPolitics - Articles - Interview with President Bush by an Economist is worth your time to read - especially with all the histrionics from the Democrats on a lot of the subjects he touches on.

On a related subject - a politician in Costa Rica is promoting the Flat Tax as a solution for the revenue problems there. It'll be interesting to see if it gets passed - a small-scale test would certainly either validate the concept or show it unworkable.

Not much blogging today - Aaron caught the Goopy Sneezes over the weekend, was out Monday... and Monday evening I got it. Stayed home from work today (second time for a non-surgical reason in 8 years) but should be able to go back tomorrow... Sure hope She Who Needs To Stay Healthy doesn't get this...

J.

May 10, 2006

Remember the Dems cheering...

When they managed to stall Social Security reform last year? After all, the problem didn't need fixing!

Project on Social Security Choice

When President Bush mentioned, during this year's state of the union address that Congress had failed to do anything to fix Social Security's looming financial problems, Democrats jumped up and cheered. This week they received a rebuke in the form of the latest report from the system's nonpartisan trustees.

Looks like things aren't as good as they thought they were.
Is Social Security as bad off as latest report indicates? - MarketWatch

Now, the trustees are saying the Medicare hospital trust fund will become insolvent in 2018, two years earlier than predicted in 2005, and the Social Security trust fund will run out of reserves in 2040, one year earlier than predicted a year ago.

Not surprising, pundits and others are speaking their minds about the so-called crisis and the possible solutions to fixing Social Security and Medicare, the need for which seems to grow larger and larger with each passing year. Is there a problem or not? And if so what are the solutions?

It would be hard to argue there's NOT a problem of some sort - and with a problem like this is eems to me that the sooner you actually deal with it, the better off you're going to be.

But there's a decided tendency in our political class to look at a problem, look at when the problem will hit (2018, 2040) and go "Eh, I'll be long out of office with a pension by then. Why should I do anything about it aside from the usual handwaving?"

And so the problem doesn't get solved, or even addressed seriously until the folks who'll be directly affected by the lack of a solution (IE the politicians who'll be in office when this hits) realized they have to do Something NOW. And the solution will be hideously expensive and make everyone unhappy.

But for now? Everything's fine. Go back to your TV. Nothing to worry about - just move along. The politicians know what's best for you. Trust them... If they say it's okay, then it must be - because they wouldn't use something as important as Social Security for partisan advantage, now would they?

J.

Oh, the spam I get...

I don't get troll-spam, instead I get stuff like this...

My name is Mary Jean Collins, I’m PFAW’s Political Director, and I’ve got great news.
Great? Oh, Pfaw!
I’m looking at the latest Cook Report – a universally respected evaluation of the competitiveness of congressional and gubernatorial races across the nation – and its findings show a progressive surge that is building daily.
As long as you can keep Pelosi and Hillary quiet...
The ruling party is finally getting its comeuppance for the jaw-dropping malfeasance in government for which it has become known – and I, for one, will take pleasure in turning these failures into a progressive rallying cry.
Uh, okay. Tell me, are there any plans by the Democrats to, you know, do things better? Aside from vague assurances that they'll do the right thing after THEY become the 'ruling party'? 'Cause, you know, I've not been terribly impressed by what the Democrats have managed to do so far re Social Security and the like...
Tom DeLay and Duke Cunningham have already delivered early gifts by deciding to cut and run from Congress. Other members of Congress in cahoots with Jack Abramoff are fearfully waiting for additional shoes to drop. And citizens across the nation are more intent on taking back their government than they have been in a long time.
A lot of those waiting for the shoes to drop are Democrats... but I'm sure you're aware of that already.
November 2006 could bring us the most earth-shaking midterm elections in over a decade – and we want you to know how PFAW Voters Alliance can help you bring a progressive mandate to Washington this fall.
This makes the possibly invalid assumption that I think a 'progressive mandate' would be a good thing.
Faced with nearly three more years of a disastrous Bush presidency, you surely want a Congress that can check and balance the executive branch as much as I do. By making a contribution and becoming a donating member of People For the American Way, you will start receiving insider news on the Voters Alliance’s strategy in the 2006 congressional elections.
That's... almost tempting. It's kind of nice when the opposition's gladly passing out news on the strategies they're going to use. But I don't see Congress's purpose to be a roadblock for the President - I see them as being representatives of the people and there to protect the people - not be shills for whatever 'progressive' theory is currently making the rounds.
Make a contribution today.

The hurdles that progressives face in today’s political and media environment are immense, but this administration’s overreaching has brought us a huge opportunity

Of course, the hurdles are mostly self-imposed. When you decide to call everyone who doesn't agree with your stance idiots and morons, you kind of raise the bar a bit. And I'm not so sure you're all that able to make use of an opportunity - how's Air America doing, BTW?
If you are angry about where the country is headed today, change its direction. Decide today to become a donating member of People For the American Way with as little as $10, $20, $50 or more.

www.PFAW.org/go/PFAW_November

Sincerely,
Mary Jean Collins
Political Director

P.S. After you have made your donation to People For the American Way, we’ll let you know right away how the Voters Alliance is working to have an impact on the November elections – and what you can do to help!

Well, the offer is tempting, but like a lot of other potential investors in 'progressive causes' I'm not going to toss my money down a rat hole. But good luck to you - maybe some day you'll realize that 'progressive' means actually making things better, not fighting the folks who do the heavy lifting on that.

Overall the letter was nicely written, well-laden with buzzwords designed to invoke an emotional response, and darn short on facts to support the premises laid out. Nope, no money for you!

J.

Now where have I heard that before?

Powerhouse

Seems familiar, somehow. (Somewhat embedded audio...)

J.

Yeah, they're making a difference...

TheReligionofPeace.com - Islam: Making a True Difference in the World

More and more I''m getting disabused of the idea that Islam is a religion compatible with civilization...

Yeah, I know - it's just the 'bad apples' that give Islam it's bad name. Sure seems like there's a lot of those bad apples around...

J.

I'm not so sure about this.

Bush says brother could be president - Politics - MSNBC.com

ORLANDO, Fla. - President Bush suggested Wednesday that he’d like to see his family’s White House legacy continue, perhaps with his younger brother Jeb as the chief executive.

The president said Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is well-suited for another office and would make “a great president.”

Well, he might - but I'm thinking two out of the same family making it to President is enough.

We've already got one 'royal' family (with all the excesses that implies) in the Kennedys. And admittedly we don't see the same excesses in the Bush family - but still... I'm a bit reluctant to see another Bush try for the slot.

Considering that there aren't any Democrats currently angling for President that I'd trust to hold my wallet, much less run the country, if Bush runs I'd likely vote for him - but I'm hoping to see what other candidates the field might hold.

J.

Progress?

Gateway Pundit: More Good News! Iraqi Tribal Leaders Unite & Denounce Terror
Looks like the main factions have had their fill of the head-hackers and the suicide bombers. Will this help much? I don't know - but it's progress and a good sign.

On a related note, Al Quaeda's complaining about the working conditions in Iraq. Not enough men, not enough supplies, no support from the Iraqi people and they're apparently managing to alienate their Iraqi insurgent support.

All in all, it's tough to be Al Quaeda... (heh)

Oops - more news. The Brookings Institution report on Iraq is up. And All Things Conservative has a bit of analysis on the numbers.

J.

Comments closed due to spam

For tonight...

A melange of articles... First, there's

Winds of Change.NET: Europe's Shame, Europe's Suicide
which makes the case that Europe is committing suicide slowly, urged on by the angst of what happened in WW2 and before. This is echoed by
The Futurist: Europe is Giving Up on the Future,
which is quite richly linked with demographic information that predicts a collapse. And over at
The Futurist: The Winds of War, The Sands of Time - Part I
one of the reasons the WoT is getting so much press is because there's been an acute shortage of wars in the last 20 years or so.

The idea of a shortage of wars is a bizzare one, isn't it? You'd think it'd be a good thing. However, if you're dependent on bad news and blood for revenue, it isn't. Further conclusions in

The Futurist: The Winds of War, The Sands of Time - Part II
point out some interesting things - at least, they were interesting to me. One of them is that war, as we knew it (like WW2) is going to be a thing of the distant past as more and more countries get their per capita GDP above $10k.

Interesting stuff to think about... Of course, the stuff going on in South America may put paid to that premise...

J.

Whoops.

You've got to pay sometime...

Palestinian gasoline supply halted - Mideast/N. Africa - MSNBC.com

NABLUS, West Bank - Palestinian gas stations began shutting down and motorists lined up at pumps after an Israeli fuel company cut off deliveries Wednesday, deepening the humanitarian crisis in the West Bank and Gaza Strip that has followed Hamas’ rise to power.

An end to fuel supplies could cripple hospitals, halt food deliveries and keep people home from work — a devastating scenario for an economy already ravaged by Israeli and international sanctions.

So it'd be running just fine if it werent for those damn Israelis not giving them money, and if the international sanctions were dropped...

It's bizzare to me how the Palestinians always manage to paint themselves as the victims of everything but their own stupidity. Hamas won't consider peace with Israel, say they want to do everything possible to destroy Israel, and Israel's supposed to keep PAYING them? For what - good behavior?

It's like the saying goes - the Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity. Hamas can stay the course - but they won't be getting shit, and they shouldn't.

J.

May 11, 2006

Help?

As I've detailed before, I've gotten the little guy a laptop loaded w/Linux (Knoppix distribution) for his birthday. He's thrilled at it - and has been poking around exploring the games. But we ran into a slight problem when trying to play DVDs...

Basically, we've got one set of DVDs that'll work - a copy of the old "Victory At Sea" documentaries from WW2. Everything else comes up with a "The source seems encrypted, and can't be read. Your DVD is probably crypted. Accoerding to your country laws, you can or can't install/use libdvdcss to read this disk, which you bought. (Media stream scrambled/encrypted)."

I'm figuring that the DVD player on the distro (Xine, .993) is in need of this, but I sure can't find any simple method to install it. Anyone know how to do it?

J.

And the dance continues...

FOXNews.com - Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Calls Israel a 'Tyrannical Regime' - International News | News of the World | Middle East News | Europe News

JAKARTA, Indonesia — Iran's president on Thursday intensified his attacks against Israel, calling it a "a tyrannical regime that will one day will be destroyed," but also said he was ready to negotiate with the United States and its allies over his country's nuclear program.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has previously said Israel should be wiped off the map, told a cheering crowd of students in the Indonesian capital that it is every country's right — not just the United States — to use new technology to meet energy needs.

He said his country was willing to negotiate, but that the United States first must drop its "bad attitude."

"We are not only defending our rights, we are defending the rights of many other countries," he said. "By maintaining our position, we are defending our independence."

Isn't that surprising? He's blaming the US. If it wasn't for us, Iran could go ahead and develop nuclear weapons - I mean power - without any problems! What a bunch of meanies we are!

And so, two steps forward, one step back. They'll push it again in a couple of days, then back off a bit. It's all just playing for time - one day he's going to announce they've got da Bomb, and everyone better do what they say or someone's gonna get nuked.

That's when it gets expensive.

How much longer are we going to play this out?

J.

Lot of news that's not getting covered...

Of course, things like American Idol have priority, right?

Check out the things that aren't getting air time...

From My Position... On the way!: We're losing in Iraq, Just like we lost in Vietnam

NOW, Go read the full stories. See, there is good news coming out of Iraq by the Public Affairs Office daily. The MSM chooses not to cover it, because the cast changes on “The View” and getting kicked off “American Idol” is more important.

The mainstream media are a bunch of jackasses. We’re winning this war, everywhere except in the media. Just like Vietnam.

Priorities... good news out of Iraq, or celebrity gossip? Well, folks couldn't POSSIBLY be interested in good stuff out of Iraq, so it'd be best just to see what Paris Hilton's doing this week. (Or maybe who.)

J.

Looks like SOMEONE...

had a really "Wild" time!

Hairy hybrid: Half grizzly, half polar bear - World Environment - MSNBC.com

IQALUIT, Nunavut - Northern hunters, scientists and people with vivid imaginations have discussed the possibility for years.

But Roger Kuptana, a guide from Canada’s Sachs Harbor was the first to suspect it had actually happened when he proposed that a strange-looking bear shot last month by an American sports hunter might be half polar bear, half grizzly.

Officials seized the creature after noticing its white fur was scattered with brown patches and that it had the long claws and humped back of a grizzly. Now a DNA test has confirmed that it is indeed a hybrid — possibly the first documented in the wild.

Somehow, you just have to wonder... was she lonely? Was he just out for a moonlight stroll? Did he promise to call her in the morning?

Well, I hope they had fun, however it happened!

J.

Yawn.

I wonder sometimes... if the NSA WASN'T doing anything to monitor stuff like this, would people get bent out of shape over them NOT doing it?

Pajamas Media: "NSA has massive database of Americans' phone calls"

As Outside the Beltway put it...

“So, the government has my phone records? Sure, I trust mega-corporations who sell my private information to telemarketers with this information. But a government agency that collects and analyzes signals intelligence? I dunno.”
He doesn't have any problem with it - and I don't see a problem with it either. Hell, my cell phone company already has a complete record of who I call and when, Vonage keeps a nice account of who and when I call - this doesn't seem like a problem to me, since all they're collecting is what numbers called where. Not tapping, just the numbers called.

YMMV, but I don't see a problem sufficient to warrant the reaction by some.

J.

Is the White House fighting back?

Kind of looks like it.

Snow issues detailed rebuttals to media coverage of the president - Examiner.com

WASHINGTON - New White House Press Secretary Tony Snow is starting off in a combative mode against the press by issuing detailed rebuttals to what he considers unfair coverage of Bush.

“The New York Times continues to ignore America’s economic progress,” blared the headline of an e-mail sent to reporters Wednesday by the White House press office.

Minutes earlier, another e-mail blasted CBS News, which has had an unusually rocky relationship with the White House since 2004, when CBS aired what turned out to be forged documents in a failed effort to question the president’s military service.

“CBS News misleadingly reports that only 8 million seniors have signed up for Medicare prescription drug coverage,” Wednesday’s missive said. “But 37 million seniors have coverage.” On Tuesday, the White House railed against “USA Today’s misleading Medicare story.”

“USA Today claims ‘poor, often minority’ Medicare beneficiaries are not enrolling in Medicare drug coverage,” the press office complained. “But by April, more than 70 percent of eligible African Americans, more than 70 percent of eligible Hispanics, and more than 75 percent of eligible Asian Americans are enrolled or have retiree drug coverage.”

Looks like they've got someone in charge of the media effort now who won't sit back and let the facts get 'altered'. It's good to see.

A good PR man can make all the difference in any effort.

J.

Interesting percentages...

Guess which 50% pays only 3.46% of the taxes...

TaxProf Blog: Joint Economic Committee Releases Tax Cuts Make Tax System More Progressive
Hmmm. The top 25% pays 83.88%? Wow. And here I thought that the bottom 50% was paying 95% of the taxes, to hear the folks against the tax cuts talk...

Anyway, that's an interesting graph. It really shows where the money's coming from.

J.

Comments closed due to spam

May 12, 2006

Dichotomy.

I'm finding it kind of odd...

Independent Online Edition > Calls for public inquiry into July 7

Report blames lack of funding for failure of security services to stop the attacks that killed 52 people. The conflict in Iraq has so far cost Britain more than $4,000m. The report said that this war had fuelled the anger of Muslims.

Here in the US, our security services seem to have adequate funding, and we're worried about them doing too much, so there's calls to limit what they can do.

In Britain, they didn't have enough funding - and couldn't do what we're doing in the US - and got blasted.

It would look like there could be a balance - but I sure don't see quite where that particular balance point would be. I'm thinking, and you might well disagree on this, that we're perhaps a bit too observant... but it's better for the security folk to be overzealous than complacent and miss something.

I might also point out that for all the fears put forth of a 1984-style oppressive surveillance type society with mandatory incarceration for dissent, that doesn't exactly seem to be happening. There's a lot of dissent, some of it pretty vocal, and some of it pretty extreme on the internet. Yet despite the fact that you can be tracked pretty darn easy through your footprints on the web - that dissent still exists.

I wonder, sometimes, if the folks screaming about the silencing of dissent and the potential jailing of the dissenters aren't simply projecting what THEY would do if they were in a position to silence speech they didn't agree with. You kind of see that in some of the speech limits in some universities, where anything other than the approved groupthink is immediately censored and discouraged (and here I thought that college was supposed to be a time of exposure to diverging ideas - guess that divergence is only allowed along very slender paths...) in the name of 'tolerance' and 'diversity'.

And you take a look at other countries like Egypt - where dissent WILL get you jailed. Or Iran, where speaking out against the regime IS potentially lethally dangerous.

And then you take a look at the folks in the US living in quivering fear about NSA programs and data mining... (Shakes head...) When you're examining something through a soda straw, it really narrows your field of view and you lose sight of the big picture. You end up focusing on a pinpoint, and you miss the club coming your way.

You can't be secure without expenditures and procedures to establish and maintain said security. Britain learned that. And after 9/11, I'm surprised that there's folks who would willingly hamstring our security agencies to the point of near-uselessness because of fear they might do too much. But again - where's the balance point? How do you establish that, when the folks who complain the loudest want the least?

J.

Looking for something interesting?

Check out Lateral Science - The Ernest Glitch Chronicles.

Steampunk, kind of. "Anarchic Experimental Science in Victorian Weardale" definitely!

Enjoy!

J.

A vision of the future?

Foreign Affairs - The Global Baby Bust - Phillip Longman

....

Still, both day-to-day experience and the media frequently suggest that the quality of life enjoyed in the United States and Europe is under threat by population growth. Sprawling suburban development is making traffic worse, driving taxes up, and reducing opportunities to enjoy nature. Televised images of developing-world famine, war, and environmental degradation prompt some to wonder, "Why do these people have so many kids?" Immigrants and other people's children wind up competing for jobs, access to health care, parking spaces, favorite fishing holes, hiking paths, and spots at the beach. No wonder that, when asked how long it will take for world population to double, nearly half of all Americans say 20 years or less.

Yet a closer look at demographic trends shows that the rate of world population growth has fallen by more than 40 percent since the late 1960s. And forecasts by the UN and other organizations show that, even in the absence of major wars or pandemics, the number of human beings on the planet could well start to decline within the lifetime of today's children. Demographers at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis predict that human population will peak (at 9 billion) by 2070 and then start to contract. Long before then, many nations will shrink in absolute size, and the average age of the world's citizens will shoot up dramatically. Moreover, the populations that will age fastest are in the Middle East and other underdeveloped regions. During the remainder of this century, even sub-Saharan Africa will likely grow older than Europe is today.

FREE FALLING

The root cause of these trends is falling birthrates. Today, the average woman in the world bears half as many children as did her counterpart in 1972. No industrialized country still produces enough children to sustain its population over time, or to prevent rapid population aging. Germany could easily lose the equivalent of the current population of what was once East Germany over the next half-century. Russia's population is already contracting by three-quarters of a million a year. Japan's population, meanwhile, is expected to peak as early as 2005, and then to fall by as much as one-third over the next 50 years -- a decline equivalent, the demographer Hideo Ibe has noted, to that experienced in medieval Europe during the plague.

...

Today there is a strong correlation between religious conviction and high fertility. In the United States, for example, fully 47 percent of people who attend church weekly say that the ideal family size is three or more children, as compared to only 27 percent of those who seldom attend church. In Utah, where 69 percent of all residents are registered members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, fertility rates are the highest in the nation. Utah annually produces 90 children for every 1,000 women of childbearing age. By comparison, Vermont -- the only state to send a socialist to Congress and the first to embrace gay civil unions -- produces only 49.

Does this mean that the future belongs to those who believe they are (or who are in fact) commanded by a higher power to procreate? Based on current trends, the answer appears to be yes. Once, demographers believed that some law of human nature would prevent fertility rates from remaining below replacement level within any healthy population for more than brief periods. After all, don't we all carry the genes of our Neolithic ancestors, who one way or another managed to produce enough babies to sustain the race? Today, however, it has become clear that no law of nature ensures that human beings, living in free, developed societies, will create enough children to reproduce themselves. Japanese fertility rates have been below replacement levels since the mid-1950s, and the last time Europeans produced enough children to reproduce themselves was the mid-1970s. Yet modern institutions have yet to adapt to this new reality.

That's interesting. I've posted before on Russia's population decline - I didn't extrapolate it out however to what it would mean to the likes of the little guy and his classmates...

It looks like China and India are going to be especially hard-hit. With the One-Child Per Family policy in China, and the relatively wide availability of both abortion and prenatal gender identification in China and India, fewer females are being born since the preference is for sons. This naturally means that when it's time, there's going to be a lot of guys who won't have any opportunities, and who's only outlet for romance might be virtual.

The article goes on to advocate much more government intervention, but one thing I didn't notice at first glance seems to me to be a no-brainer when it comes to government control... banning of contraception in a society when certain levels of population and productivity are reached. I'm not an advocate, BTW, of a straight chastity approach, or of not teaching kids about sex. And it seems to me like getting government involved in promoting a population expansion is pretty risky stuff with a great potential for abuse. (See Margaret Atwood's "A Handmaid's Tale" for an example of that...)

But it looks like there's a problem coming down - it'd be good to have some ideas on how to deal with it.

J.